[CheshireTheCat]

I think Moorehead is trying to say that, in theory, if you have no other forms of election fraud, playing games that result in a third-party that was on the ballot in several states during several past presidential election cycles suddenly not being able to get ballot access is sort of a form of fraud in and of itself. It certainly suggests some sort of collusion or conspiracy.

[Robert DeLong]

Would have made no difference whatsoever, as the election fraud was well beyond a 3rd party candidate being or not being in the race. It's a delusional premise. Besides that, if voters were regulated to only 2 candidates, those voters who would have cast their vote for a 3rd party candidate, most likely cast no vote at all.

But indeed it did deny those who wanted neither from casting a vote at all. Thus depriving them of their right to vote. Kind of like what the FBI has charged the guy running memes that "crossed the line", in their words for charging him with the stupid charge.

Perhaps his lawyer can use this article in his defense