[cgbg]

The war waged against Trump by the deep state is simply unprecedented in US history.

This statement is blatantly false, and is the foundation for the rest of the nonsense.

Time for a history lesson.

His name was JFK.

After the Bay of Pigs disaster (where the CIA tried to force him to support the invasion with air support or risk a public relations disaster), JFK declared war on the agency. He fired the agency head (Dulles) and threatened to shred the agency into a thousand pieces.

The agency retaliated on a November day in Dallas, and Mr. Dulles was appointed to the Commission that investigated the assassination. Meanwhile Operation Mockingbird controlled the mass media to assure that anyone asking any unpleasant questions would be called a "conspiracy theorist".

That history laid the foundation of a Deep State that would become more and more entrenched as years went by....

The massive voter fraud in 2020 was a Deep State operation, and we have a de facto military dictatorship at this point.

Whether they assassinated President Trump or stole the election from him was a mere tactical question--the result for the nation was the same.

[Norski]

Possibly.

This blogger posting weird items writes such wonderful hopium, does he not?

[Steve Van Doorn]

I agree JFK was killed for similar reasons by the Deep state. They killed him. The Deep state is far larger today and shown us how strong they really are today. This is far large attack against Trump then JFK assassination. They’re going after Trump supporters today just because we supported him. that is freaking massive.

[Thumper1960]

The CIA is not infallible. George H.W. Bush’s patsy, John Hinckley, botched the operation and poor George had to play second fiddle or 8 years.

[jmacusa]

An angry loner named Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK. End of story. When any two people know anything in Washington it’s a conspiracy, so the saying goes.

No one would have been able to keep their mouths shut over something like killing a US president.

[logi_cal869]

Your outline is accurate, insofar as I’m concerned.

So what, then, is the tactical landscape for leaving Trump in play? Is it just the face of an ideological enemy? The latter is nonsensical, as all actions & proclamations do not require more than his name.

All they’ve accomplished is to shift a narrative to a new distraction, forcing the establishment to embrace the new paradigm...AND own it.

It seems to me that the reality lies somewhere in between.

I hearken back to the actions of Adm. Rogers in alerting Trump: It’s clear that there is an ongoing battle within. It seems also clear that Trump has been advised well to steer clear of all the traps set for him.

I don’t believe that the ‘deep state’ confident in its position and the actions of-late reinforce that notion.