McConnell and Pelosi knew the riots were coming and used them as a ruse to eliminate Trump

Flopping Aces ^ | 01-22-21 | Daniel John Sobieski

[Starman417]

It was a set-up. It was a scheme to create a way for McConnell and Pelosi to rid the DC swamp of its worst enemy- Donald Trump. They wanted things back the way they were when the swamp creatures were in charge of everything.

Those riots always bugged me. Something wasn't right. The fences were breached a full 20 minutes before Trump finished speaking. The press still fails to report that Trump asked for a "peaceful" protest.

But there's more. A lot more.

The Capitol police let the protesters in

THEY JUST LET THEM IN ?????? yeah i’m logging off pic.twitter.com/QJ0JCARWOC — joy⁷ (@sugaspov) January 6, 2021

They ushered them through. From Jack Dawkins pic.twitter.com/qqLrcCxi1p — chris (@TechSolChris) January 7, 2021

Capitol police open doors for the protestors. They stand aside and invite them inside. pic.twitter.com/OnSd3KGzz5 — Christina Bobb (@christina_bobb) January 8, 2021

Of that there is zero doubt.

On January 11 it was reported that the head of the Capitol police, was rebuffed in his effort to get reinforcements to protect the Capitol

The outgoing chief of the U.S. Capitol Police said House of Representatives and Senate security officials had thwarted his efforts to call in the National Guard, contradicting assertions from other officials who said the force had not asked for help.

The former chief of the federal force, Steven Sund, told the Washington Post his supervisors were reluctant to take formal steps to put the Guard on call even as police intelligence suggested that the crowd President Donald Trump had invited to Washington to protest against his defeat was probably going to be much larger than earlier demonstrations.

Sund’s remarks were in contrast with those from officials in other branches of government, who said after Trump’s supporters stormed into the Capitol building last Wednesday that they could have provided more people to secure it – but no one from the Capitol Police asked.

Sund told the newspaper in an interview he had asked House and Senate security officials for permission to request that the National Guard be placed on standby in case he needed quick backup but his request was turned down.

"House of Representatives and Senate security officials"

And they report to....you guessed it.

On January 12 the Washington Post reported that the FBI knew in advance of the threat of violence

An internal document has revealed some of what the FBI knew before riots erupted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, including that officials expected and warned of “violence” and had seen reports from online users that a “war” was to take place on that day.

The Washington Post has obtained the FBI documents, which includes a situational report approved for release a day before the rally supporting President Donald Trump. The rally led to a calamitous siege of the U.S. Capitol, which left five people, including a Capitol police officer, dead.

A day before rioters stormed Congress, an FBI office in Virginia issued a clear-cut warning that extremists were preparing to travel to Washington to commit violence and “war,” according to the internal document reviewed by the Post. The new findings contradict those of a senior official’s recent comments explaining that the bureau had no information to indicate the imminence of damage, injuries and death at a pro-Trump protest near the White House. (emphasis mine)

Then on January 13 John Solomon reported that he tried under FOIA to obtain the MPD report on the riots

Investigative journalist John Solomon said the D.C. Metropolitan police has denied his news company's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to see the department's investigation into the Capitol Hill riot. In an interview with "Real America's Voice" host Eric Greitens on Wednesday, Solomon said police are keeping interviews with key capitol security officials secret because there is something "embarrassing."

The reporter said he would like to know what House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and the authorities knew about the attack beforehand. Solomon said he has "significant evidence" that the Capitol Police, FBI, and Congress had prior warning of a planned attack and it was not a spontaneous riot emanating from President Donald Trump's speech that day.

Then he asked

"The question I have is what did Nancy Pelosi, what did Mitch McConnell know about these threats beforehand?" he asked. "If they didn't know, it's an intelligence failure of the police. If they did know, there's something they didn't tell us before we went into this impeachment round today."

There's a reason the MPD wouldn't cooperate.

Today Solomon reported that he asked Pelosi's and McConnell's offices a question

[sijay]

“Query: can Trump’s lawyers introduce the mountains of election fraud evidence into the Senate record in his defense?”

The answer is yes. In Pelosi’s haste bringing forth the article of impeachment, the fraudulent election is mentioned. And that is definitely a point the Dems don’t want anyone to dwell on.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

PING!

[rmlew]

Not having the manpower to stop a mob is not the same as letting them in.
For the record, communists may well have burned the Reichstag, not the Nazis. Either way, the result was the Enabling act. We must prevent one in the US. Calling it a set up won't help. It will make us look like nuts.

[henbane]

“Query: can Trump’s lawyers introduce the mountains of election fraud evidence into the Senate record in his defense?”

The answer is yes. In Pelosi’s haste bringing forth the article of impeachment, the fraudulent election is mentioned. And that is definitely a point the Dems don’t want anyone to dwell on.

With a triumvirate of Trump-haters (Pelosi--McConnell--Roberts) in charge of the trial, will any evidence be allowed into the Record that helps exonerate the President while, at the same time, that same evidence implicates Pelosi and McConnell in knowingly allowing the invasion of The Capitol Building by their silence?

[grey_whiskers]

DUMPSTAG FIRE.

[terart]

I am betting Trump was never warned about what the FBI and Capitol police was hearing was going to happen and I would also bet the words Trump put in his tweet wasn’t the normal wording he would have used to describe the upcoming rally— example “it’s going to be a wild time”...it was an odd choice and not normally how he put things out. I am guessing maybe someone close to him (who now we know could have been an establishment spy) kept using the word around him. It was just too weird.

[terart]

I’m betting he had no clue and was never warned...he is always late starting and I am betting antifa didn’t count on that fact. Think about how much Trump was kept in the dark or sabotaged

[Mr. K]

I think you’re talking about a different type of leadership

They were able to successfully pull off a countrywide ballot fraud With multiple layers and contingency plans

[VRW Conspirator]

The Republicans’ fatal flaw is they assume that the Dems will play by the rules..........................

That is why I keep my tagline flying.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

They all knew ! It was a set up !

False Flag Incident !

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

They dare not to cal it
What it is = SEDITION !