Posted on 12/23/2020 10:26:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind
I have been under bizarre “gag” order issued by Atlanta judge prohibiting me from responding to accusations in lawsuit filed by lawyers with whom I formerly shared office space. Lawsuit used to attack me in left wing rags. Mother Jones, AJC & soon NY Times.
Connect the dots. https://t.co/lpOGHUYw7R
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 23, 2020
Right now we’re at war out right war with the left the Democrats and this is communism insurgency which is using them to take over the great United States of America
Except for the totally uninformed stupid or corrupt everybody knows that the Democrats stole this election
The proof is coming out like Sidney Powell has exclaimed “like a firehose”
Show me the fact in Google Facebook all of the tech media all they have right now is to try to silence all of the dissent of the 80+ million people who support this great president and are out raged at the outright blatant theft of this election
Ensure all they have right now is censorship
Sensor or D platform anybody that says that the Democrats cheated and stole the election
In fact they want to completely said sir anybody that they generally disagree with like in this case in Lynnwood who is a great American hero
I love how Lynn goes right after the politicians Brad Raffensperger and the feckless governor and calls them what they are bought and paid for by the Chinese communist party doing their bidding and supporting the will of the Georgians
I support Lynn 500%
In the lawsuit there is a message where he claims to have boinked one of the wives.
this would be before the marriage to his current wife
I suspect the lawsuit is going to get very nasty
It’s crazy to me that while the French Revolution had a single Robespierre, seemingly the plurality of our judiciary is on that level. How the hell did we fall so far?
There is nothing “bizarre” about this. American Bar Association model rules (rule 3.6, specifically) prohibit a lawyer from making extrajudicial statements where it has a “substantial likelihood” of prejudicing the proceedings.
Lawsuits are litigated in courts of law, not courts of public opinion. And where one lawyer is constantly in the news, and his every utterance is covered by the media, the judge is well within his rights to issue a gag order to protect the integrity of the legal proceeding.
I’m being slow today. Who claims that, and against one of which wives?
I don't think that's what the lawsuit said. I think he was threatening one of his fellow lawyers, and he said that he loved the guy's wife and child, so he wasn't going to ruin him. He is also quoted as saying: "“by the time I am through with Taylor Wilson (an associate), he’s going to wish all I had done was **** his wife.”
Quite a bunch of bizarre claims in the lawsuit, most of the references are to voicemails, so I'm sure there are recordings of them:
https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/404/51923/Lin-Wood-complaint.pdf
Wood hasn't denied saying what is in the lawsuit, but he is saying they are taken out of context, made when he was having a difficult time... blah blah.
Read the suit for yourself.
But only one saide may not be gagged while the other is free to prejudice juries as much as they please. It is bizarre, and it has a political purpose. It is intended to silence him in his efforts to explain voter fraud.
That is probably all the lawsuit was intended to do. Produce this one gag order. In 4 weeks it would be dropped before the first motions were ever heard, much less before discovery.
I pay taxes for that piece of 16th Street in Washington DC and I most certainly object to Bow-Wow summarily just seizing the right to name that property after a terrorist communist group. She is just another dumb black commie and racist, one with delusions of grandeur.
So, a lawyer said unsavory things. BFD. I actually kind of WANT that in a lawyer.
But what does that have to do with smartmatic and dominion throwing the election?
I wish Lin Wood would identify the Judge.
Nothing, really, it's an unrelated issue.
that is the sentence I am referencing. I dont know what “#### his wife” means in that sentence other than he boinked her.
Why do you say only one side was gagged? Do you know that for a fact?
Treason is criminal disloyalty, typically to the state. It is a crime that covers some of the more extreme acts against one's nation or sovereign. ... A person who commits treason is known in law as a traitor.
Why are we allowing these traitorous organizations to flourish and elected like these outrageous, trained monkeys defiling the USA and their oaths....disgusting!
I found neither the lawsuit details, nor the gag order. But it looks like the lawsuit is simply a dispute between partners in a law firm. It has nothing to do with legal challenges to the election result.
I don’t know whether the gag order was unilateral. But if it was, there may be justification for it: the other litigants are not in front of TV cameras all day long. Nobody has heard of them.
It's ambiguous. I think it means, "he would rather I boinked his wife than do what I am going to do to him."
You got it almost 100% correct...we are also at war with republicans...
Public is passive. Biased to obedience. Trusting. We are a population ripe for the plucking.
Educate the chosen ones in the ways of liberals and leftism, guard the gates to non-conformists cannot get in. There's your judiciary. They are true believers. Even the so-called conservative ones.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.