But only one saide may not be gagged while the other is free to prejudice juries as much as they please. It is bizarre, and it has a political purpose. It is intended to silence him in his efforts to explain voter fraud.
That is probably all the lawsuit was intended to do. Produce this one gag order. In 4 weeks it would be dropped before the first motions were ever heard, much less before discovery.
Why do you say only one side was gagged? Do you know that for a fact?
I found neither the lawsuit details, nor the gag order. But it looks like the lawsuit is simply a dispute between partners in a law firm. It has nothing to do with legal challenges to the election result.
I don’t know whether the gag order was unilateral. But if it was, there may be justification for it: the other litigants are not in front of TV cameras all day long. Nobody has heard of them.
Lawfare.