Posted on 12/18/2020 10:18:25 AM PST by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
The rumors about Justice Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein have been out there for a long while, pretty much everywhere, because an unknown ‘John Roberts’ is listed on Epstein flight manifests. There is absolutely zero evidence that Justice Roberts is the John Roberts spelled out on the logs. THERE IS ALSO NO EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY.... The rumor persists and in times like this, it explodes.
Lin Wood tweet: "I have long had questions about “the John Roberts” on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs. I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH. America is now entitled to know the answer. Every lie will be revealed. Pray."
(Excerpt) Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...
Oh, great. Now we're going to have conspiracy theories about why the Chief Justice is a VP for an international finance firm founded in CHINA!
(...in 1919.)
What would that be, do you have a link? Because the only references I have seen linking a Roberts to Epstein was on that pilot's flight log..........
So AIG was founded in 1919? Who knew.....LOL!
You do notice (ignoring the distraction in the Rumsfeld et al posts) that there are two subjects being discussed on the thread, here... one being inflated, and one being engulfed.
One engulfed, being Roberts conversations...
The other, inflated, being a distraction you’ve debunked...
Leaving only the issue of the content of the conversations ?
Roberts being compromised is still a legitimate enough concern without it being pinned down to an inflated and ruptured particular, given the abstract on the performance.
But, whatever the truth of the compromise... the fact of conversations held and captured is not in any way dependent on any element of that externality.
So, why pair up two subjects... ensuring one works in a bait and switch to enable easily disposing of it ?
you will have to do a search for it.
i found it after it was referenced in a post to John Cardillo.
and then back tracked to the oral arguments that was also mentioned on that tweet.
Love your use of the English language in an attempt to shame me.............So fuck off asshole!
With that being said.....
Didn't realize I was but thank you for your careful observation.........
I thought I was addressing the Epstein/Roberts flight log controversy...........Shame on me.
At least I debunked that long held theory, didn't I?.....LOL!
if you dont like this source many have it ..you just have to search
btw, i never paid attention but that flight doesnt go to epstein island
it goes from Palm Beach to michigan
2. The March 22, 2010 entry, he was flying the Gulf Stream 1159 with the registration number N530GA
3. The flight originated in Palm Beach International (PBI) and arrived in Oakland County International airport (PTK) in Michigan which is consistent with where V.P. John Roberts lived in Bloomfield Hills........
4. At the time of that flight, the jet was owned by AIG, as I have already posted.
5. The passenger on that plane, John Roberts, was the Vice President of AIG and resided in West Bloomfield, Mi.
As I have already posted........
That poster’s post has too many big words and flowery language for me to understand..but uh..in simple terms
the word Epstein shows up on the thread title
so uh...
fair game to debunk
The different plane identification numbers shows that he was flying different aircraft owned by different companies and was obviously a contract pilot working for those companies.......
I can't for the life of me figure out how anyone could come up with the theory that this flight log of this single pilot, David Rodgers, (Sp?) was associated with Epstein............
You do good work too Rummy.......thanks
The ‘other’ John Roberts is in the media.
Track WHERE either/both of them were in that time period.
The flight logs have specific time/dates.
Would the pilots know???
Dunno. Perhaps to get word to the other justices about the type man their Chief is.
.
Maybe it's because of your comment to me last night....
No, DumbA, the flight log shows that a John Roberts did fly on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane
You might want to look at my Post # 79 above before you call anyone an asshole.........
So you are claiming that the flight log did not show that a John Roberts flew on Jeffery Epstein’s airplane?
I did not call anyone “an asshole”.
Supreme court has responded,they said they did hearings by phone,but they did not say deliberations were done by phone,so they are denying they met in person
So you are claiming that the flight log did not show that a John Roberts flew on Jeffery Epstein’s airplane?
That's exactly what I am saying.........unless you can prove me wrong.
The only lame piece of evidence that idiots on the internet are using to try and link Justice Roberts to Epstein is that page from the flight log of the pilot David Rogers.....And for what it's worth, there is not one plane on his log that is registered to Epstein.......
Oooo kay,
the flight log did not show that a John Roberts flew on Epstein’s airplane.
Epstein was a procurer for a complicated international espionage and blackmail operation.
HIs "persona" required him to associate with, and to do favors for, the powerful as well as the rich and famous. He was very good at attracting them, but not all of them (maybe even not most of them) were into the young girls. A lot of them, presumably, were just grifting on the free stuff, including the free flights.
These posts ALL count EVERY entry in a logbook of Epstein's plane as "going to pedo island".
In the case of "Bill Clinton's 26 trips to pedo island" most of them were legs on international trips associated with his phony foundation and money laundering trips (each takeoff and landing gets logged as a flight, and Epstein's plane wasn't exactly an A-380).
With the "John Roberts" story, this has escalated beyond the ridiculous to the absurd.
The explanation for Roberts is simple. He's a Trump-hating elitist Ivy Leaguer who grabs every chance he gets to wipe his shoes on the head of the deplorables.
That's all. He's not "compromised". It's not blackmail.
He's just defending his social class.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
