Posted on 12/18/2020 10:18:25 AM PST by Trump_vs_Evil_Witch
The rumors about Justice Roberts and Jeffrey Epstein have been out there for a long while, pretty much everywhere, because an unknown ‘John Roberts’ is listed on Epstein flight manifests. There is absolutely zero evidence that Justice Roberts is the John Roberts spelled out on the logs. THERE IS ALSO NO EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY.... The rumor persists and in times like this, it explodes.
Lin Wood tweet: "I have long had questions about “the John Roberts” on Jeffrey Epstein private jet flight logs. I suspected it was our Chief Justice. MSM has shown no interest in investigating issue to find TRUTH. America is now entitled to know the answer. Every lie will be revealed. Pray."
(Excerpt) Read more at citizenfreepress.com ...
Such obvious political bias explains why Sidney Powell, the State of Texas and 35%+ of the American People can expect no justice from the ‘Justice’ Roberts
Lin Wood also tweeted that he has physical evidence of such call between Roberts and Breyer...and it is in safe keeping with two other people (deposited with them by Wood).
Maybe Lin could pay Eptein’s former girl friend a visit and get a affidavit from her. or he might have already.
For those with short memories, this is the same guy who urged Republicans not to vote in the Georgia Senate runoff.
Enough to make us even more angry at GWB!
I'm just gonna raise the bulls*t flag on this.
I'm so tired of people saying they have evidence and not showing it. If you have evidence, let's see it.
I posted info that anyone can go check. When a poster became outraged that I dare post it for other people to check..which I thought was completely ridiculous ..assinine..and a few other choice words.....I went to the SCOTUS website.
You can, too. It’s easy
L Lin Wood should have done it instead of passing on this theory
Judge Roberts was present for two oral arguments on one of the days associated with the name Roberts on the log. He was also present for oral argument the following day.
You can actually read the transcript and listen to his voice.
“For those with short memories, this is the same guy who urged Republicans not to vote in the Georgia Senate runoff.”.....Lin Wood was referring to the ABJECT CORRUPTION demonstrated by both the Georgia Govenor & Sec of State.....both Republicrat recipients of bribe money in the purchase of the Dominion voting machines,...........
...... potential election fraud problems which remain unresolved at this time
That said, the President trusts Lin enough to retweet his Roberts/Breyer phone call claim and then Lin tweeted about the evidence being placed by him with two contacts.
After all is said and done, we can only hope all this comes out...and soon.
I think he is relying on conspiracy websites like Hal turner
there is no excuse for him not to have done basic research to see Roberts was in court on one of the days listed on the John Roberts flight log. And he was in court on the following day.
What is the point of tweeting about something and saying you can prove it but then not proving it? What is the value in sitting on it, if it does indeed exist? There's an obvious downside in that it makes him look like Adam Schiff 'i've seen damning proof!' when we now know for sure that he never saw any such thing.
You think Lin Wood is kracken up?
Would that be John Roberts in the background? Looks like a kind of DEEP STATE whose who picture.....
We know Saddam Hussein was installed by the CIA, (and he claimed that he was removed by the same people at their convenience) who else is in the pic?
HE (LIN) said that IF they used the SAME voting processes as Nov 3rd, ie, fraudulent.
It could be a tactical maneuver. Perhaps to put pressure on unknown people.
I have often wondered about John Roberts in that flight log but have been too lazy to do any extra work to figure it out
However, a lawyer who is out spouting conspiracy claims staking his reputation on it should have at least looked at the Oral Arguments transcripts and records.
Why would Lin Wood was his ammo at this time? Maybe there should be call for the impeachment of Roberts instead?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.