Do those idiot justices not realize that the “riots” were almost all astroturf. . .probably paid for by communists, socialists and foreign interests?
False headline; no Justices “caught on video.”
Roberts behaves and has the affect of a bought, blackmailed man.
So the more violent you are, the more influence you have? I understand now.
They have just congratulated the communist rioters and given them carte blanche to continue, the enveloping tyranny be damned...
There are no Supreme Court justices on this video. This is a Congressman talking on the House floor about what he heard.
This headline and article are misleading.
This is BS.
Wowzer - so glad this got the light of day ...
This story is being repeated over and over again from the same dubious reporting. Repeating it isn’t going to make it true, the USSC doesn’t act this way.
Justice hates Trump and that’s why....Roberts and anybody else can say what they want as an excuse but Roberts has a personal beef about Trump.
The name is “Injustice Roberts” and though there is nothing but hearsay I can fully believe he might say such things.
I’m not lawyer, but even I know is that set up is called a
“Heckler’s Veto”. They want to scare you into submission.
What does Justice Thomas say? He’s the only one I trust.
Diabolical efforts expended upon, and ostesibly from, those who seek the truth.
I might find this more believable if the person who heard this said the justices were in a conference call near one of the justice’s office. I really don’t believe people like Breyer, Sotomayer, and Kagan would sit in a room with the 6 other justices and discuss this during a pandemic.
l8r
Clickbait. There is no video of Justice Roberts or any other Justice in the video.
This post isn’t even 4chan worthy.
BTW, it probably did happen... but no one can prove it, so what's the point? And claiming there is a video when there is not is just... fake news.
He needs to recuse himself.
So the argument against this being true seems to be that the justices have been working remotely for several months meeting virtually only. Someone on twatter posted a link to the press releases as proof of that, but the court does remain open for official business, but is closed to the public. Another poster stated that this was actually a live meeting held at the court because the justices did not trust that the feed for a virtual meeting was secure.
Is there any proof one way or another regarding the meeting format where this loud argument/debate took place where these things were supposedly said? Were all of the justices actually on site at the USSC in a conference room?