Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missouri Is Latest State to Join Texas in SCOTUS Lawsuit Against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin
GP ^ | December 9, 2020 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 12/09/2020 7:27:22 AM PST by White Lives Matter

Eric Schmitt, the attorney general from Missouri, announced on Twitter late Tuesday that his state is “in the fight” after Texas announced its election challenge that would invalidate the 62 Electoral College votes from four battleground states and award President Trump with a second term.

“Election integrity is central to our republic,” Schmitt, a Republican, tweeted. “And I will defend it at every turn. As I have in other cases—I will help lead the effort in support of Texas’ #SCOTUS filing today. Missouri is in the fight.”

Schmitt’s tweet came shortly after Ken Paxton, the attorney general from Texas, explained his motivation behind the suit to Fox News’ ‘Hannity.’

He said that election management in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin—the states named in the suit—directly impacted voters in the his state. In particular, he pointed to changes that were made to expand mail-in voting amid the coronavirus pandemic.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; joebiden; missouri; scotustexas; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Dan in Wichita
Dem trolls are gonna troll. That's what they do 24/7.
However the facts of the matter is that the Supreme Court has already taken up this case.
They have given the four states in up to Thursday to respond.
21 posted on 12/09/2020 7:57:50 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cats1

Thank you.

Far too many headlines are written stating that people, entities, etc. support something, yet no specific names are listed. What a waste of print, and how typical of the poor journalism we see these days.


22 posted on 12/09/2020 7:59:52 AM PST by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Thanks for the clarification. If SCOTUS rules for Texas, then the remedy is it goes to the House. Got it.

Many thanks


23 posted on 12/09/2020 8:01:18 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: White Lives Matter

Go SEC!!!


24 posted on 12/09/2020 8:01:34 AM PST by Sir Bangaz Cracka (Slamming dat white cracka'a head into dat sidewalk causin he be scared)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

“Keep telling yourself that.”

Prove me wrong.


25 posted on 12/09/2020 8:01:44 AM PST by brownsfan (Schools. If we don't fix the schools, nothing else matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cats1

It keeps growing.


26 posted on 12/09/2020 8:03:07 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cats1

It keeps growing.


27 posted on 12/09/2020 8:03:07 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wita

It’s being reported South Dakota is involved, if that’s a mistake I hope at least one more state will join. Would be great to have a number in the double digits.


28 posted on 12/09/2020 8:06:33 AM PST by Cats1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Thanks for the clarification. If SCOTUS rules for Texas, then the remedy is it goes to the House. Got it.

And how can we depend on a Pelosi-led House to come up with a remedy even remotely legal or Constitutional?

29 posted on 12/09/2020 8:10:40 AM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

By joining the lawsuit do they mean file an “amicus brief” or is there another way to enjoin the actual lawsuit?

Sorry, but this is limit of my knowledge of the law.


30 posted on 12/09/2020 8:12:47 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

Fortunately, it’s not up to her in the least.

Each STATE in the House gets a single vote. They count the number of R delegations, and the number of D delegations. The winner is the one with the most delegations.

It’s that straightforward.


31 posted on 12/09/2020 8:13:41 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dangus
They key here is that invalidation is sufficient. As long as Biden falls below 270, it goes to the state delegations in the House.

UNLESS the winner is simply whoever has a majority of electoral votes cast.

If the SC throws out these four states, Biden still leads in certified electoral votes 244-232. IF it is the case that the winner needs a simple majority of votes cast, then Trump still needs one state to flip. All 4 states require the governor to call a special legislative session in order for the legislatures to vote on electors. NONE of the four have any interest in doing so! We could see the SC give us what we want - decertify all 4 states - and still see Fraudulent Biden! All that is required is the 4 states do nothing.

32 posted on 12/09/2020 8:35:07 AM PST by Galatians513 (I voted! and it didn't matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cats1

I’m glad Florida joined. I wish Ohio would. A question for everyone, though: If the lawsuit brought by these ten states is based upon the four states not acting within their state Constitutions, could not those four states try to cite evidence of the ten doing the same thing? I don’t know if the ten did or not, but the drive-through voting in Houston comes to mind. Was that Constitutional in Texas?


33 posted on 12/09/2020 8:49:16 AM PST by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine I don’t think we need one,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Galatians513

Surely, one of them would do something.


34 posted on 12/09/2020 8:51:20 AM PST by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine I don’t think we need one,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

Well, yes,but those delegations do have to vote, I think. Each gets one vote.


35 posted on 12/09/2020 8:54:00 AM PST by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine I don’t think we need one,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Galatians513

I am not so sure you are right about that. I have never heard an argument stating that a simple majority of electoral votes wins. I am more inclined to think that it goes to the House.


36 posted on 12/09/2020 8:56:49 AM PST by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine I don’t think we need one,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

Sort of. They aren’t allowed to ‘vote conscience’.


37 posted on 12/09/2020 8:59:33 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MrChips
I am not so sure you are right about that. I have never heard an argument stating that a simple majority of electoral votes wins. I am more inclined to think that it goes to the House.

That would be the next legal battle, is it a fixed majority of 538, or a majority of valid electors? I don't know which it is, either.

38 posted on 12/09/2020 9:05:14 AM PST by Galatians513 (I voted! and it didn't matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cats1

Idaho? Utah? Wyoming? North Dakota? Kansas? Oklahoma? Alaska? Our friends in the West are dragging ass.


39 posted on 12/09/2020 9:12:56 AM PST by MSF BU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita

I think that the PA case was not expedited (it wasn’t thrown out from what I understand) is because by itself it wouldn’t change the outcome from a Biden victory — so there’s no corrective action possible. Instead they take the case that theoretically would make a difference by changing the election outcome.


40 posted on 12/09/2020 9:54:17 AM PST by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson