Posted on 12/02/2020 2:42:17 PM PST by grundle
The mainstream media has been reporting – truthfully – that Trump spent $3 million for a recount of Wisconsin, which ended up increasing Biden’s lead by 87 votes.
However, in this video, Dr. Steve Turley claims that there is more to the recount.
He says that:
1) Wisconsin law requires recounts to include an audit of the votes as part of any recount.
2) Wisconsin Democrats tried (and failed) to remove this audit from the current recount.
3) The audit exposed hundreds of thousands of illegal mail in ballots, because Wisconsin law requires a written request to send someone a mail in ballot, but these illegal mail in ballots were sent out without such a written request.
4) The mainstream media that reported on Trump’s recount increasing Biden’s margin of victory deliberately left out these three things, because they do not want people to know that the Democrats stole Wisconsin.
I don’t know if Dr. Steve Turley is right or not. But if he is right, then it proves that the mainstream media has failed to do its job.
Skip to 2:57
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JjaQ-3masc
Cmon. The mainstream media’s job is PROPAGANDA on behalf of the deep state and those statists/leftists in charge. It is absolutely doing its job.
What difference does this make if the Libs continue to get away with their crimes and no one is going to even try to stop them??!
Before a recount can mean anything, you first have to remove all of the fraudulent ballots.
If there were hundreds of thousands of illegal votes, and there was an audit, how did Biden’s lead increase?
So did the audit get done?
And once they are mixed together, it becomes impossible to tell which is which.
Because they counted the illegal votes anyway.
More Fake News ?
The MSM’s job is to suck Dims behinds..
All these integrity-free criminals are getting very tiresome. Hopefully righteous justice will soon be theirs.
1) Wisconsin law requires recounts to include an audit of the votes as part of any recount.
Breach of contract. They took his money, to the tune of $3 million, and did not provide the full service that was promised.
3) The audit exposed hundreds of thousands of illegal mail in ballots, because Wisconsin law requires a written request to send someone a mail in ballot, but these illegal mail in ballots were sent out without such a written request.
Someone should be prosecuted for these illegal acts.
bookmark
They improved their stealing techniques?
Because there probably is no way to tell who the illegal votes were for.
Thank sweet Baby Jesus for your blog, exposing all this important stuff.
Yay blogs, especially yours.
So.. where did you find this material before you stuck it on your blog?
Baby Jesus hates theft. Are you doing theft?
Audits don’t throw out fraudulent votes, they merely note whether or not ballots or methods are in question, not following standards or rules, etc.
Nevada ‘fraud’: 1,500 ‘dead’ voters, 42,248 voted ‘multiple times,’ RV camps as ‘homes’
The strategy had 3 points.
Point 1: Prove that illegal votes were cast. Technically, if this story is correct, they have proof now, in that an official audit found these votes from ballots which were not requested. But a court might rule that the pandemic emergency orders which led to sending out ballots was a valid order, and that the law allowing that order to exist supercedes the election law. But let’s suppose the court agrees that there are thousands of invalid votes.
Step 2: Because invalid votes are mixed with valid votes, all the votes are tainted, and must be discarded. Get the court to agree with this, and the heavily-democrat areas are thrown out, leaving Trump a victory.
Problem with step 2 is that the remedy is rather extreme. It IS a remedy that happens regularly in normal elections, if this was an election for a state office for example a judge could just rule that a new election be held. But they can’t hold a new election for these counties for president, the constitution clearly confines voting to the one day.
Step 3: If you can’t get the judge to throw out the votes, get the judge to invalidate the entire election. This throws the picking of electors back to the legislature, who might pick a slate, or might not have the ability to do so, in which case the electors don’t get picked and don’t go to the electoral college.
If you can make step 3 happen in enough states, you can lower the number of electors for Biden enough that Trump ends up ahead in the smaller majority.
Problem being, the judge won’t do that; if he did, the legislature would likely send electors based on the election anyway, and if they didn’t, one or two states aren’t enough to push the election to Trump.
That’s why Trump is doing this in multiple states. In Nevada, they have an excellent factual presentation about fraud, but again, no way to tie it to particular votes, and Nevada is too few electors to help.
Georgia actually did a good job of vote validation, most of what we are told is a lie (they require voter ID, and they did multi-person signature match, that was the change, to allow more representatives to be part of the signature match so it wasn’t just one election worker).
PA could possible have won such an argument, that their entire law was unconstitutional and the vote needs to be thrown out — except that state is nowhere near close, nd I can’t imagine the Supreme Court throwing out the electors in a race where there is such a big spread, and even if you threw it back to the state legislature, I’m not sure the republicans there would get enough votes to seat Trump electors. If Trump had only lost by 20,000 votes or so, I could have seen the legislature doing so, or trickily, deciding to award proportional electors, sending half of each candidate. Not enough to swing the election though.
And Michigan wasn’t close enough to get thrown out either. This was a very close election, 33,000 swapped votes, picked precisely, would give Trump 270 electoral votes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.