Posted on 11/29/2020 7:40:15 PM PST by Perseverando
The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on the chaos and fraud in the Virginia presidential election this year.
On November 9th we reported on that moment at 5:12 AM Eastern when the vote counters took 373,000 votes off of the state totals. President Trump had a substantial lead throughout the night before this point.
Another lucky Democrat was able to surge ahead in her race after THOUSANDS of ballots were “found” on a flash drive!
What are the odds?
Virginia Democrat Surges Ahead In House Race After Thousands Of Ballots Are ‘Found’ On A Flash Drive
And on November 15th Joe Hoft reported on the MULTIPLE REVERSALS and PROPORTIONAL VOTE ENTRIES in Virginia on Election night after 11 PM.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Agree about NY and CA - if for no other reasons than to show the national scope of The Steal, to put a bunch of criminals in jail, and to bring the national PV totals more in line with the actual, fair, results.
“ Bill Cunningham (radio host) said there is not time for the Supreme Court to hear this case, so it can’t happen.”
—————
Cheating in a nationwide election fir POTUS (with who knows how much leakage into House and Senate elections) is such a dangerous and fundamental threat to our form of government, such an utter disregard of Equal Protection, that the Court MUST address it - and I think that a simple standard that they could lean on would be if there was so much as a single vote total containing decimalized votes, then the election is corrupted and CANNOT be certified. Throw it, by default, to that state’s legislature which, in any case, has the power to conduct elections within its borders and to name Electors for the Presidential election.
Once this is over, no matter who takes the oath, EVERY federal election in every single state must be investigated thoroughly and, if cheating of any kind is found, people must go to jail; further, voting rules have to be changed to prevent this in the future - because if not, then our system will have been destroyed and the end result will be anarchy and/or civil war. Yes, it is THAT important - people who have been lied to, especially on this scale when it comes to entrusting people with power, will never believe again shirt off immediate and harsh measures to prevent a recurrence.
Another simple standard that the SC could use to prevent certification due to cheating is if the machine was connected at any point to the internet IF it is even theoretically possible to hack the machine remotely.
So that’s all kinds of weird. There are huge injections of Biden votes, but then removals of similar or the same amounts, and at the same time there are an order of magnitude smaller injections of Trump votes, with another smaller injection of Trump votes.
And what is up with the decimal places?
.
Cumulatively, the poll showed about a 17% loss of votes by Biden if the public had been informed.
January 6 and 20 are truer deadlines.
Her work is also what could get us the House majority and Senate majority certainty that voters also undoubtedly voted for.
And do more to bring down the Deep State and effect long-term change.
Plus her effort has already yielded some evidence protection in GA.
It is not an either/or question, but part of an all-of-the-above strategy.
Here’s a better attempt by Pamella Geller to explain it:
Someone tampered with your second picture
"It's a feature of the Dominion system, designed with a backdoor, so that people could watch, in real time,
and calculate with an algorithm how many votes they needed to change to make the result they wanted to create" .
EDITED 2020 Virginia results gave Joe Biden a 2.4 million vote lead over President Trump’s 2.0 million votes. What’s odd and needs investigating is how the election ended up this way. No one seems to be questioning the votes in Virginia but they should be. There are multiple reasons why the Virginia results in the 2020 Presidential election should be investigated.
Virginia’s election results started coming in shortly after the polls closed on Election Day.
<><> There were 378 separate entries or feeds WRT VA found in the file and shared around the web since a few days after the election.
The NYT data feed shows all entries at a state-by-state level....does not include county or precinct level data.
<><> One oddity in the file noted immediately is that the results for votes are not in whole integers (e.g. 1, 2, 3…).
<><> All of the entries have fractional amounts. This makes no sense since ballots do not come in fractions in the US. Each vote equals one vote.
<><> The first 125 entries reported in the NYT data feed were basically reasonable. The results varied in percentage of votes between candidates and appeared to be random with most votes going to Pres Trump.
<><> Up through this time (11:03 Eastern), Pres Trump was leading 52% to Biden’s 46%.
<><> 3.3 million of the eventual 4.4 million votes had already been cast or about 75% of the vote was in.
This is when things went off the rails.
<><>Eight entries totaling nearly (800,000) votes were removed from the database during this time. This makes no sense. Each vote should be ADDED to the vote totals not taken away.
<><> Overall three entries of over 300,000 votes were posted in the data base to Biden’s vote total.
<><> Two entries of over 300,000 votes were taken away.
The same happened to President Trump’s totals but in much smaller amounts. Overall 851,000 votes were added to Biden’s totals and only 318,000 were awarded to President Trump between 11:14pm (Eastern) on November 3rd and 5:00am November 4th.
This resulted in over half a million more votes net going to Biden and 73% of the votes during this timeframe.
================================
Investigation into McAuliffe's foreign donation campaigns Engineered by The Clinton Foundation
SOURCE https://elemifuentes.com/2018/07/29/terry-mcauliffes-doj-investigation-and-other-unscrupulous-donations/
In 2016, former Gov. of Virginia Terry McAuliffe was under a joint investigation by the FBI and prosecutors from the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section. The investigation centered around Terry McAuliffe’s 2013 campaign and whether he accepted political contributions that were forbidden by federal law.
As part of the probe, investigators have scrutinized McAuliffe’s time as a board member of the charitable foundation set up by former President Bill Clinton: The Clinton Global Initiative.
McAuliffe is a Clinton insider.....former chairman of the Democratic National Committee from 2000 to 2005, and co-chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, speaking to reporters said he was “shocked” by the investigation and that it “has nothing to do with the Clinton Foundation.”
“This was an allegation of a gentleman who gave a check to my campaign,” McAuliffe said. “I didn’t bring the donor in. I didn’t bring him into the Clinton foundation. I’m not sure if I’ve even met the person, to be honest with you.” Among the McAuliffe donations that drew the interest of the investigators was $120,000 from Chinese businessman Wang Wenliang through his U.S. businesses. Wang was previously delegate to China’s National People’s Congress, the country’s ceremonial legislature.
Mr. Wenliang chairs the privately held China Rilin Construction Group, which holds a majority stake in Dadong Port Group, a strategic Chinese port near North Korea. He is also Chairman of the Board Zhongyu Gas Holdings Limited.
U.S. election law prohibits foreign nationals from donating to federal, state or local elections. Penalties for violations include fines and/or imprisonment. It appears that Mr Wang holds a permanent resident status, according to a spokeswoman, which would make him a U.S. person under election law and eligible to donate to McAuliffe’s campaign. The donation in question revolves around $70,000 for his campaign and $50,000 for his inaugural — from West Legend Corp., a New Jersey construction materials company controlled by Chinese billionaire Wang Wenliang. As The Intercept explains:
The sheer size seems improper. Yet Virginia permits unlimited, direct contributions by both individuals and corporations to candidates for state offices — e.g., governor, the state senate and general assembly. Virginia is one of six states that allow direct, unlimited contributions by anyone. (The others are Alabama, Missouri, Nebraska, Oregon, and Utah.) In other words, for Virginia state elections, the fact that Citizens United made it possible for corporations to spend an unlimited amount in ways uncoordinated with candidates was largely irrelevant. Corporations could already just cut checks directly to candidates for as much as they wanted.
Then there’s the issue of West Legend’s foreign ownership. According to U.S. law, it’s illegal for a “foreign national” — meaning a foreign individual, corporation, or government — to make any donation in connection with a federal, state, or local election. However, the legal definition of a foreign national specifically excludes any “corporation … organized under or created by the laws of the United States.”
So, since West Legend Corp. is incorporated in the U.S., it’s not a foreign national and can take part in U.S. elections like any other American company.
Where Wang’s permanent residency would be legally significant is under FEC regulations that forbid any foreign national from engaging in the “decision-making process of any person, such as a corporation,” regarding political expenditures. As long as everyone participating was a U.S. citizen or permanent resident, then Wang and McAuliffe are legally in the clear. FEC advisory opinions also suggest that to be legal, the $120,000 donation must have been generated by business activity in the U.S.
Mr Wang Wenliang also has been a donor to the Clinton foundation, pledging $2 million. He also has been a prolific donor to other causes, including to New York University, Harvard University and environmental issues in Florida.
While the way politicians harvest money from donors is appalling, as of yet, there is no evidence that McAuliffe broke any rules in this particular case.
In 2015, McAuliffe’s political action committee, Common Good Va., returned a $25,000 donation from a company with ties to Angola’s state-owned oil company after The Associated Press raised questions about its legality. Federal law prohibits campaigns at any level from receiving money from outside the U.S.
Clinton Foundation donors gave $13 million to Terry McAuliffe
Records show that there are 120 donors who have contributed to both Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe and the Clinton Foundation, giving a total of $13.4 million to the governor’s campaigns, inauguration, state party and political action committee. That increases to nearly $18 million if donors to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign are included.
In fact, West Legend Corp. was on the was only the 57th biggest donor to McAuliffe during his two campaigns for governor. Coming in first at $6.7 million was the Democratic Governors Association PAC. Next was Independence USA, a Super PAC funded by Michael Bloomberg to promote gun control, with $1.7 million. Among the other corporations that gave to McAuliffe are tobacco giant Altria ($243,667), Hospital Corporation of America($177,500), and Genentech ($150,000). Notable individual donors include long-time Clinton supporter Haim Saban ($572,636), Facebook’s first president Sean Parker ($500,000), BET founder Robert Johnson ($495,000), and Bill Clinton ($110,000)
The investigation from the Washington post shows a long symbiotic relationship between McAuliffe’s governorship and Hillary Clinton’s prospects for taking Virginia. This was briefly discuss in a previous article, and would be further expanded upon in subsequent ones. 57 small Clinton donors gave a total of $5,513,171 to McAuliffe
This bracket has the largest number of donors, who mostly gave moderate amounts to both campaigns. All but two gave less than $250,000 to McAuliffe. One of the exceptions is billionaire environmentalist Thomas S. Steyer, who gave McAuliffe a total of $1.6 million through his PAC.
The other is Rhode Island marketing executive Mark Weiner. He and his firm gave nearly $380,000 to McAuliffe, who helped Weiner win the right to sell official Bill Clinton inauguration merchandise. McAuliffe even pitched the items on QVC. Weiner later connected McAuliffe to an investment that allowed him to profit from a stranger’s death. McAuliffe later donated the profits to charity.
Dubai's A. Huda Farouki, a longtime Clinton supporter who spent New Year’s Eve in 1999 with the Clintons, gave McAuliffe $100,000 in campaign cash and at least that much to the Clinton Foundation. He is chairman of Dubai-based defense contractor Anham, which a government audit found to have over-billed the Pentagon by $4.4 million, Bloomberg Business reported.
Common Good VA is a Virginia state PAC run by Clinton’s long-time associate and advisor Terry McAuliffe. The former governor appeared to have donated nearly $500,000 to Jill McCabe, whose husband Andrew McCabe was at the time Associate Deputy Director of the FBI, and shortly after, promoted to Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. As a second in command to the director of the FBI, McCabe oversaw the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails.
McAuliffe told the Wall Street Journal that he encouraged Jill McCabe to enter the state-run in March 2015 during a meeting with her and her husband.
Although Common Good VA is only permitted to fund state-level candidates, several of its largest donations came from outside of Virginia – as well as $50,000 from Clinton Foundation official Doug Band in New York, $100,000 from Clinton loyalist Robert Johnson in Maryland, and $10,000 from Clinton mega-donor Stephen Cloobeck in Nevada.
In the following months, Common Good VA received many major donations from other close Clinton associates, including $100,000 from Bill Clinton’s business partner Ron Burkle in California and $50,000 from Leonard Lauder in New York Clinton was the feature speaker at a June 26, 2015 ticketed joint fundraiser for the Common Good VA and the Democratic Party of Virginia. Although the speech was billed as Clinton’s first official event after her campaign launch, none of the money raised went to her own campaign. The Virginia Democratic Party claimed at the time that the fundraiser pulled in over $1 million. \
The fact that Hillary Clinton’s inner circle was raising substantial funds for Gov. McAuliffe’s PAC and this same PAC gave close to a half-million dollars to the campaign of the wife of the senior FBI official involved in the Clinton investigation sure raises questions about the impartiality of the FBI’s investigation.
Common Good VA was the largest single donor to Andrew McCabe’s wife, giving her $467,000 in 2015. Her campaign also received $207,788 from the Democratic Party of Virginia, a group over which McAuliffe exerts significant control.
The then Deputy director McCabe told the Wall Street Journal that he complied with federal ethics rules and was not promoted to lead the Clinton probe until months after his wife’s unsuccessful senate bid ended.
The FBI said in a statement that during his wife’s campaign, Mr. McCabe “played no role, attended no events, and did not participate in fundraising or support of any kind. Months after the completion of her campaign, then-Associate Deputy Director McCabe was promoted to Deputy, where, in that position, he assumed for the first time, an oversight role in the investigation into Secretary Clinton’s emails.” If none of the above raise any eyebrows in terms of conflicts of interests, there are a few more things worth noting:
Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook used to work for the McAuliffe’s super PAC payroll before he joined her presidential campaign. Brian Zuzenak, the executive director of Common Good VA at the time who oversaw the donations to Jill McCabe, left Common Good VA last May to join the Clinton campaign as its Virginia field director. Common Good VA’s executive director Michael Halle also joined the Clinton campaign as battleground analytics director in the spring of 2015. Common Good VA’s former fund-raiser Amanda McTyreis now a finance director for Clinton. Former Common Good staffer Marissa Astor left to become an assistant Clinton campaign manager.
It seems that Terry McAuliffe and associates do use their campaign donations to pay each other off in order to hide from the law. They bribe, coerce and pay off any official that investigates them because, of course, the lady justice only applies to the common folk.
Agree 100%! MN was over the top for the President this cycle, and everyone here knows it.
That was what is known as a “glitch”.
I am not sure why he is saying that, the court acted pretty quickly during Gore v Bush.
I would like to see James from MI declared the winner and make GA irrelevant.
thanx for posting the geller link.
looks to me like they’re hiding their criminalality in the election fraud in plain sight,
imo, fractional vote totals are prima facie evidence of fraud.
only way to split a vote into fractions is a computer program that is used to count the votes
I think their evidence at thos point is overwhelming. The only question is whether the rot of corruption through our courts and state and federal legislatures is too great to overcome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.