Posted on 11/26/2020 3:58:28 PM PST by SeekAndFind
What do Joe and Hunter Biden know about Dominion Software being Accessed by Chinese and Iranian Agents to Manipulate the Election? Read on.
https://www.baldingsworld.com/2020/10/22/report-on-biden-activities-with-china/
The documented facts of the Bidens Activities in China
by Christopher Balding. Key Points of the Report:
Joe Biden’s compromising partnership with the Communist Party of China runs via Yang Jiechi (CPC’s Central Foreign Affairs Commission). YANG met frequently with BIDEN during his tenure at the Chinese embassy in Washington.
Hunter Biden’s 2013 Bohai Harvest Rosemont investment partnership was set-up by Ministry of Foreign Affairs institutions who are tasked with garnering influence with foreign leaders during YANG’s tenure as Foreign Minister.
HUNTER has a direct line to the Politburo, according to SOURCE A, a senior finance professional in China.
Michael Lin, a Taiwanese national now detained in China, brokered the BHR partnership and partners with MOFA foreign influence organizations.
LIN is a POI for his work on behalf of China, as confirmed by SOURCE B and SOURCE C (at two separate national intelligence agencies).
BHR is a state managed operation. Leading shareholder in BHR is a Bank of China which lists BHR as a subsidiary and BHR’s partners are SOEs that funnel revenue/assets to BHR.
HUNTER continues to hold 10% in BHR. He visited China in 2010 and met with major Chinese government financial companies that would later back BHR.
HUNTER’s BHR stake (purchased for $400,000) is now likely be worth approx. $50 million (fees and capital appreciation based on BHR’s $6.5 billion AUM as stated by Michael Lin).
HUNTER also did business with Chinese tycoons linked with the Chinese military and against the interests of US national security.
BIDEN’s foreign policy stance towards China (formerly hawkish), turned positive despite China’s country’s rising geopolitical assertiveness.
Summary:
Lost among the salacious revelations about laptop provenance is the more mundane reality of influence and money of major United States political figures. Ill informed accusations of Russian hacking and disinformation face the documented reality of a major Chinese state financial partnership with the children of major political figures. A report by an Asian research firm raises worrying questions about the financial links between China and Hunter Biden.
Beginning just before Joe Bidens ascendancy to the Vice Presidency, Hunter Biden was travelling to Beijing meeting with Chinese financial institutions and political figures would ultimately become his investors. Finalized in 2013, the investment partnership included money from the Chinese government, social security, and major state-owned banks a veritable who’s who of Chinese state finance.
It is not simply the state money that should cause concern but the structures and deals that took place. Most investment in specific projects came from state owned entities and flowed into state backed projects or enterprises. Even the deals speak to the worst of cronyism.
The Hunter Biden investment firm share of a copper mine in the Congo was guaranteed with assets put at risk by the larger copper company to ensure deal flow to Hunter’s firm.
In another instance, Bank of China working on an IPO in Hong Kong gave its share allocation to the BHR investment partnership.
They were able to do this because even though the Hunter Biden firm completed no notable work on the IPO, it is counted as a subsidiary of the Bank of China. The Hunter Biden Chinese investment partnership is literally invested in by the Chinese state and a subsidiary of the Bank of China owned by the Chinese Ministry of Finance.
The entire arrangement speaks to Chinese state interests. Meetings were held at locations that in China speak to the welcoming of foreign dignitaries or state to state relations.
The Chinese organizations surrounding Hunter Biden are known intelligence and influence operatives to the United States government. The innocuous names like Chinese People’s Institute for Foreign Affairs exist to “…carry out government-directed policies and cooperative initiatives with influential foreigners without being perceived as a formal part of the Chinese government.”
Interestingly the CPIFA is under the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. When the investment partnership was struck in 2013, the Minister of Foreign Affairs was Yang Jiechi. Yang would have been very familiar with Hunter Biden from his days in Washington as the Chinese Ambassador to the United States from 2001 to 2005 during which he met regularly with Joe Biden chairing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Today the same individual who oversaw institutions helping shepherd Hunter’s investment partnership as the Minister of Foreign Affairs is Xi Jinping’s right hand man on foreign affairs and member of the powerful Politburo.
Most worrying is the financial leverage this gives the Chinese state over a direct member of the Biden family. Despite the widely reported $1-1.5 billion of investment the reality is likely much higher. A co-founder of the investment firm reports the total assets under management as $6.5 billion.
While this number cannot be completely replicated, given that two deal alone were worth in excess of $1.6 billion this number is not unrealistic at all. A 2% annual fee on assets under management would generate $130 million annually.
Add in the 20% fee on capital gains the firm would recognize and it is not difficult to see Hunter’s stake being worth in excess of $50 million.
According to Hunter’s attorney, he did not invest his $400,000 in the company until 2017. Even assuming the veracity of this statement, this raises a major problem.
Founded in 2013, the firm had large amounts of revenue and assets under management by 2017. In other words, his $400,000 stake would have already been worth far more than what he paid for it. This paltry $400,000 investment worth more than $50 million now would have realized a gain of more than 12,400% in three years.
The difficulty in eluding these concerns is their documentability by anyone who cares to look. There is no potential for hacking because it is all public record in China. Any journalist who wishes to look can go review IPO prospectuses, news reports, or corporate records.
There is no secret method for discovering this data other than actually looking. There is simply no way to avoid the reality that Hunter Biden was granted a 10% stake worth far in excess of what he paid for a firm that is literally operated and owned by the Chinese state.
AUTHOR’S NOTE I did not vote for Donald Trump in 2016 and have significant concerns about his policies in areas like immigration. Having lived in China for nine years throughout the Xi regimes construction of concentration camps and having witnessed first hand their use of influence and intelligence operations, the Biden links worry me profoundly.
Whether Joe Biden personally knew the details, a very untenable position, it is simply political malpractice to not be aware of the details of these financial arrangements.
These documentable financial links simply cannot be wished away.
So you don't see any possibility in the data presented, that there were communications of any type/frequency registered between systems in China etc and here? Then what exactly are they showing, or are you saying they just made the remote addresses up?
Hey DemocRats.... Now THIS is treason.
At least they’re making an effort to cover it.
Personally, I don't think voting machines in the US should be subject to *ANY* connections of *ANY* type that originated in China. You disagree?
[My 39 years of experience as an ELINTer and FISINTer tells me that this is pure BS and there’s no correlation between the types of electronics involved here.]
Her shtick is that of a televangelist asking for money. Except most televangelists sell the promise of an afterlife which, by definition, will remain out of reach to their donors, in the here and now, this side of the Great Beyond, whereas all Powell has on offer is more accusations combined with excuses for why the prior set of accusations failed to gain enough traction for her to win court cases. Just when you think the music has to stop sometime, she rewinds the music box somehow, such that it plays a different tune, and gets the fundraising operation going again.
Powell is a skilled operator. Unfortunately, her skill set doesn’t include winning lawsuits. She was involved in defending Arthur Andersen in the aftermath of the Enron financial scandal. As anyone who followed that imbroglio knows, Arthur Andersen had its license yanked and shut down as a business entity. Maybe this time, Powell has finally got the goods. But no one should hold his breath waiting for something concrete to come out of the Powell PR machine.
Of equal relevance is: Were either China or Iran acting in consort with anyone in US government, either national or local.
If so we would have a very serious case of treason to resolve as neither nation is a friendly nation and would be meddling in our election for no reason other than to harm us.
“Gateway Pundit keeps coming out with stuff.
Are they a reliable source???”
sometimes razor thin on their sources, and sometimes misleading or sensational headlines, but seems they’ve been one the best providing important updates during all this.
Have you read the 17 pages of Exhibit 8 from the military officer? Maybe someone can link it. I dont have one. Would be interested to know what you think of it.
Okay..here is the exhibit that goes into great detail about this program by the military person
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf
So, have you even looked at what she legally submitted yet, or are you just going on your naked eye, gut feel on things?
I’m about as technical as joe bide so what exactly does the information and data in the exhibit mean?
I have been reading them for a number of years now and I have never felt as though they were trying to pull my leg.
I am worse...so relying on some experts here giving an opinion
[So, have you even looked at what she legally submitted yet, or are you just going on your naked eye, gut feel on things? ]
The big disconnect was propping him/her up as an Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) analyst and then pull a 180 u-turn into the cyber realm which is a completely different discipline for which ELINT has zero correlation to cyber. The disposition should have only expounded upon their “white hat” expertise and where it was obtained. From the sounds of it, this person might have some hacking experience but no formal qualifications and/or certs to prop up their bona fides.
okay thanks..that exhibit was my only hope because they rest of it won’t do anything...so....
back to hoping someone makes a good Con Law Argument in PA.
btw, do you think the Chavez program as has been described in possible? Or a similar program that accomplished that goal.
So that's enough for you, huh. No real interest in this case, then. I mean other than tarnishing her past record, here, based on something you read somewhere, in the past. Just wondering. I find it curious how disinterested people are in what's actually been filed, etc. Especially curious when they complain or criticize someone, when they're really not even caught up on things. Hope that makes sense. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.