[My 39 years of experience as an ELINTer and FISINTer tells me that this is pure BS and there’s no correlation between the types of electronics involved here.]
Her shtick is that of a televangelist asking for money. Except most televangelists sell the promise of an afterlife which, by definition, will remain out of reach to their donors, in the here and now, this side of the Great Beyond, whereas all Powell has on offer is more accusations combined with excuses for why the prior set of accusations failed to gain enough traction for her to win court cases. Just when you think the music has to stop sometime, she rewinds the music box somehow, such that it plays a different tune, and gets the fundraising operation going again.
Powell is a skilled operator. Unfortunately, her skill set doesn’t include winning lawsuits. She was involved in defending Arthur Andersen in the aftermath of the Enron financial scandal. As anyone who followed that imbroglio knows, Arthur Andersen had its license yanked and shut down as a business entity. Maybe this time, Powell has finally got the goods. But no one should hold his breath waiting for something concrete to come out of the Powell PR machine.
So, have you even looked at what she legally submitted yet, or are you just going on your naked eye, gut feel on things?
What, in your estimation, would constitute genuine evince as opposed to unfounded assertions? Every piece of evidence is an assertion to some extent. At what point does it rise to the level of prosecution worthy? Please give an example. Thank you.
A few days ago, it was all about Rudy Giuliani who was embarrassing the president with his big mouth. Trump should take him out of the national scene....
And Lin Wood, a mental case, pity poor Kyle Rittenhouse at the mercy of suck a poor lawyer....
And now it is all about what a lousy lawyer Sydney Powell is...a fake. Another Elmer Gantry.
And much much more.
Accusations by people no one ever heard of until they became “famous” sources of wisdom on the ‘net.
She was involved in defending Arthur Andersen in the aftermath of the Enron financial scandal. As anyone who followed that imbroglio knows, Arthur Andersen had its license yanked and shut down as a business entity.The Anderson decision was overturned by the Supreme Court. Throughout, Powell was instrumental in exposing the prosecutorial abuse of a-hole Weissman in the Enron prosecutions, over which SCOTUS ruled in Anderson's favor.