The Nobel Prize Winner Who Had Fauci's Number - Kary Mullis Invented the PCR Technique (Eleven Short Videos)

BrassCheckTV ^ | Apr 23, 2020

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Fauci and Friends Use The Tool To Make "Virus Hysteria" Possible

Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize Winner in Chemistry in 1993, invented the most important research tool in biology in the last 50 years.

When Mullis was alive (he passed away last year), he railed against Fauci and others like him who were using it to run scam after scam.

In the 1980s and 90s, it was AIDS.

Ten more videos at link.

[MAGAthon]

Wikipedia: Kary Mullis
In his 1998 humorous autobiography proclaiming his maverick viewpoint, Mullis expressed disagreement with the scientific evidence supporting climate change and ozone depletion...the evidence that HIV causes AIDS...
The medical and scientific consensus considers these hypotheses as pseudoscience, HIV having been conclusively proven to be the cause of AIDS and global warming strongly shown to be caused by human activities...

Mullis died of ***pneumonia on August 7, 2019 at age 74 in Newport Beach, California.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kary_Mullis

***An inconvenient OR convenient death!

following video was posted 14 Nov but, at the end of the interview, reference is made to the US election about to take place, so it was probably recorded late Oct or thereabouts.

focuses on German virologist, Christin Drosten, who rejiggered the PCR test to create fear and the CASEdemic:

20mins to 28mins: how much can we trust PCR tests etc? IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CYCLES:

Youtube: 54m31s: 14 Nov: German Lawyer Sues The World Over Coronavirus
posted by Valuetainment
Patrick Bet-David has a virtual sit down with consumer protection trial lawyer Reiner Fuellmich to talk about the Coronavirus and his work on the German Corona investigation committee.
About the guest: Dr Reiner Fuellmich is one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee, which since July 10, 2020, has been listening to large number of international scientists’ and experts’ testimonies, to find answers to questions about the pandemic, being asked by people worldwide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpOzHHJmy7g&t=1s

Wikipedia: Christian Drosten
From 2017 until 2019, Drosten was a member of the German Ministry of Health’s International Advisory Board on Global Health, chaired by Ilona Kickbusch.
COVID-19 pandemic​

***On 23 January 2020, Drosten, along with other virologists in Europe and Hong Kong, published a workflow of a real-time PCR (RT-PCR) diagnostic test, ***which was quickly accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO) who sent test kits to affected regions...

In March 2020, he was appointed to the European Commission’s advisory panel on COVID-19, co-chaired by Ursula von der Leyen and Stella Kyriakides...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Drosten

17 Nov: Utica Phoenix: Portuguese Appeals Court Deems PCR Tests Unreliable
By Pete Bianco
On November 11, 2020, a Portuguese appeal court ruled it was unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that “if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.” The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown...

The court’s summary of the case to rule against the Regional Health Authority’s appeal reads as follows: “Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.”

***In the US, the FDA’s instructions for PCR testing recommends a threshold of ***40 cycles for a specimen to be considered positive. See page 35 of the instructions...

At 25 cycles the original material has been multiplied 33,554,432 times.
At 30 cycles the original material has been multiplied 1,073,741,824 times.
At 40 cycles the original material has been multiplied 1,099,511,627,776 times.
As you can see there is quite a difference in magnification at various cycle thresholds.
It is also important to remember PCR was invented as a way to create copies of genetic material. Its was never intended to be a diagnostic tool.
https://www.uticaphoenix.net/2020/11/17/portuguese-appeals-court-deems-pcr-tests-unreliable/

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Thanks for the added information.

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

I have a tone of respect for Mullis.

But even he can be wrong (just like Fauci)

Mullis wrote the forward for a book that said AIDS was not caused by HIV. The theory was interesting but turned out to be incorrect.

Humans can be wrong...any human....even Fauci or Mullis.

(The book was titled “Inventing the AIDS Virus.”

[Widget Jr]

These claims are being challenged by those who know medicine and science better than us.

Kay Mullis died August 7, 2019, before Covid-19 started. That that using site has 30 second to 2 minute excepts of longer interview from the early 1990s. People who work in medicine and scientific fields know their fields better than posters second guessing them over politics. When our side creates and spread politicized half truths, we bad for it.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Thanks for confirming that you despise free speech from people you consider to be your inferiors.

Some fine day you’ll be devoured by the monster you so willingly helped to create.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Never mind that both the PCR and fast CCP virus tests are completely unreliable and generate false positives out the wazoo.

The important thing is that you can get the “case” numbers up to keep your fellow human beings imprisoned.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/20/portuguese-court-rules-pcr-tests-unreliable-quarantines-unlawful/

[Widget Jr]

It's not about free speech. It's about understanding what you are talking about.

PCR inventor – who died in 2019 – did not say his test won’t work for COVID-19 infections
Fact check: Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn’t say it can’t be used in virus detection

"The post begins with the words “COVID-19 TEST a FRAUD?”, then introduces the alleged quote from Mullis, who invented the PCR method in 1985 and was recognized for this achievement by being awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 (here)."

"However, the quote is actually from an article written by John Lauritsen in December 1996 about HIV and AIDS, not COVID-19 (here)."

Taking a 30 year old video of a person who died before Covid started, and using it support claims he never made, that those who are working on Covid can find out he never said, understand what he did and did not say better than we can, is not helping.

[Myrddin]

Mullis did an evening talk at UCSD when I was an undergrad (1974-1976). He struck me as a burned out surfer. We came to hear his discussion of a new technique that came to be called PCR in the current time frame. At that point in time, we had to be satisfied with doing squashes of salivary glands from Drosophila melanogaster (fruit fly) to get the polytene chromosomes and stain them for pictures under the microscope. PCR allowed DNA amplification that mimics the natural polytene chromosome and opened the door to being able to do sequencing.

Mullis was working at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography down the hill from the UCSD campus at the time he did this evening talk for the molecular biology students at UCSD. His biography makes no mention of what he was doing after 1973 until his acknowledged invention of PCR in 1983.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The Covid test is random-result generator.

You did hear about Elon Musk taking it 4 times in one day last week getting positive-negative-positive-negative?

And baseball players sitting out one day because the tested positive and playing the next day because they tested negative.

How do you explain that?

I know. I know.

I’m just too stupid to understand, right?

[Widget Jr]

Does that justify misreprenting people for our political benefit, when those who know the subject far better than either your or I will spot it as easily as I did?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

If you’re so smart, why can’t you construct a coherent sentence?

I have no idea what you just said.

[Widget Jr]

OK, since following the thread is getting hard.

The claims going around are that Mullis said PCR testing could not be used to find viruses, and specifically Covid.
He died before Covid came out so he could not say anything about Covid.
The two links I posted in #8 go over how his words have been twisted.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

You are playing that magician’s trick of indirection.

I will go through it again.

The Covid test is random-result generator.

You did hear about Elon Musk taking it 4 times in one day last week getting positive-negative-positive-negative?

And baseball players sitting out one day because they tested positive and playing the next day because they tested negative?

How do you explain that?

[Widget Jr]

My replies were directed at the content posted, not the comments under it.

Medical tests have errors, some are built in, some are known. That's why they are often repeated, especially for a new disease. Errors will happen, and the issues with PCR are known.

As it turned out, Musk did have a covid.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

So a test that gives random results is OK?

Check.