Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoking Gun: Dominion Transferring Vote Ratios between Precincts in PA. - By: Edward Solomon
rumble ^ | November 20, 2020 | 2one3studio

Posted on 11/21/2020 4:29:39 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: MHGinTN

That didn’t happen to me. I’ve always been able to view videos on Facebook.

Do you have some kind of script blockers or other security software on that might trigger their login popup?


41 posted on 11/21/2020 7:12:28 PM PST by TigersEye (2020 - The year of massive frauds. Impeachment - masks - lockdowns - Biden - elections...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PATed

I understand what you are saying and he addresses this for the 1 to 4 or 1 to 3 or lower (and more likely ratios).

Where the math becomes disturbing and this is what the chatter has been about online is when you get to highly unlikely ratios such as 1 to 65 or 1 to 23 etc etc. The further you get away and the smaller the ratios become the less likely, statistically, that those numbers would occur in a pattern.

There is some VERY odd math at play here. Much of it, as would be expected with any criminal fraud involving “shaving”, appears normal, but any time you have an algorithm you will have a pattern. I thought the author was quite honest about this AND he is not claiming it was continuous within a precinct either and he pointed out that some of these data sets might be odd, but they were likely legit.

I can buy that a 1 in 4 pattern in 20 precincts is usual - after all, we saw many precincts throughout the country best that percentage.

When you get into a 1 in 65 or 1 in 48 you are WAY past the numbers that even Obama saw. To find such numbers occurring in 4 precincts at once is astounding. To then see those same numbers transfer to 4 other precincts that had NOT had numbers even remotely approaching that percentage is odd. Do the statistical probability in your head. 1 in 65 is less than 1%. To see that repeated EXACTLY in 4 precincts at the same time when it had been an 80-20 split prior to the “shut-down” is highly suspicious.


42 posted on 11/21/2020 7:16:40 PM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: lightman

We need poll police, who can lock down the crime scene and preserve evidence.


43 posted on 11/21/2020 7:27:22 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PATed
I am not unsupportive of President Trump’s contesting the election, but I’m not willing to overlook arguments that don’t make sense.

Your statement goes well beyond double negative, soaring into an impressive quintuple negative sentence.

"I am not unsupportive of President Trump’s contesting the election, but I’m not willing to overlook arguments that don’t make sense."

If we reverse all of the negatives above, here is what appears:

I am supportive of President Trump’s contesting the election, and I’m willing to overlook arguments that do make sense.

Still a bit hinky, even with all of the negatives removed, noob. Clarity is important.

44 posted on 11/21/2020 7:30:56 PM PST by NautiNurse (Are the Dems stealing votes in Philadelphia? Rod Blagojevich says, "Is the Pope Catholic?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

If you look at the timestamp we’ve been discussing for the range of Trump votes across all 1,702 precincts from low to high, there are a few precincts at the beginning where President Trump got zero votes, and then some more where he got very few votes (like 1 out of 76). The biggest precinct where he got zero votes is 34-08, with 110 Biden votes and 0 Trump votes.

Then the Trump ratio rises steadily through the 1,702 precincts until it reaches precinct 26-02, where Trump received more than 85% of the vote.

So the real question is whether it’s possible that Trump received zero (or close to zero) votes in a small number of Philadelphia precincts. I think that it’s possible in a place like Philadelphia (just like I would imagine there are other areas of the country with some precincts that voted 100% Trump).


45 posted on 11/21/2020 7:33:57 PM PST by PATed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Light’em Up!


46 posted on 11/21/2020 7:44:29 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

You must be fun at parties.


47 posted on 11/21/2020 7:48:27 PM PST by PATed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Court. Soon. REAL TESTIMONY. UNDER OATH. NO MEDIA


48 posted on 11/21/2020 9:41:32 PM PST by Truthoverpower (The guv-mint you get is the Trump winning express ! Yea haw ! Trump Pence II! Save America again )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PATed; Fred Nerks

There’s no secret Philly precinct that is 90% for President Trump to which secret “ratios” are being applied to change the vote. >>>>>>>>

Not reallym the ratio in any precinct of 99% Biden and 1% Trump is not a naturally occurrung distribution. Neither is 100% Biden and 9% Trump.

Generally 20% of Democrats voted for president Trump, more or less by a few percentage points.This was born out by questionnaire survey data compiled at Trump rallies.

You joined FR for 2nd amendment purposes?
Then I say you are a Johnny one note troll.

Are you wealthy enough?You won’t be able to afford the proposed Biden gun tax of $200.00 per gun, nor the ammo tax of 1000% over price.Nor will you be able to drive far to hunt of shoot either, with 7 dollar gas at the pump.

Enjoy wishing ill to the Trump cause. Your enjoyment likely will not last very long.


49 posted on 11/22/2020 4:57:27 AM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism:http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson