Smoking Gun: Dominion Transferring Vote Ratios between Precincts in PA. - By: Edward Solomon

rumble ^ | November 20, 2020 | 2one3studio

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Rumble — In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November fourth.

In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below):
https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds

A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall dataset spanning an entire week.

Original data sets:
https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6

"The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from the expected vote count and the expected percentage.

It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.

Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.

To hide it's trail, Dominion reassigns the same "ratio set" to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).

During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).

This explains why Jo Jorg got so many votes in every precinct (I'm a Libertarian and I know very few libertarians who voted for Jo this year, due to the importance of this monumental election)."

[TigersEye]

That didn’t happen to me. I’ve always been able to view videos on Facebook.

Do you have some kind of script blockers or other security software on that might trigger their login popup?

[volunbeer]

I understand what you are saying and he addresses this for the 1 to 4 or 1 to 3 or lower (and more likely ratios).

Where the math becomes disturbing and this is what the chatter has been about online is when you get to highly unlikely ratios such as 1 to 65 or 1 to 23 etc etc. The further you get away and the smaller the ratios become the less likely, statistically, that those numbers would occur in a pattern.

There is some VERY odd math at play here. Much of it, as would be expected with any criminal fraud involving “shaving”, appears normal, but any time you have an algorithm you will have a pattern. I thought the author was quite honest about this AND he is not claiming it was continuous within a precinct either and he pointed out that some of these data sets might be odd, but they were likely legit.

I can buy that a 1 in 4 pattern in 20 precincts is usual - after all, we saw many precincts throughout the country best that percentage.

When you get into a 1 in 65 or 1 in 48 you are WAY past the numbers that even Obama saw. To find such numbers occurring in 4 precincts at once is astounding. To then see those same numbers transfer to 4 other precincts that had NOT had numbers even remotely approaching that percentage is odd. Do the statistical probability in your head. 1 in 65 is less than 1%. To see that repeated EXACTLY in 4 precincts at the same time when it had been an 80-20 split prior to the “shut-down” is highly suspicious.

[Nuc 1.1]

We need poll police, who can lock down the crime scene and preserve evidence.

[NautiNurse]

I am not unsupportive of President Trump’s contesting the election, but I’m not willing to overlook arguments that don’t make sense.

Your statement goes well beyond double negative, soaring into an impressive quintuple negative sentence.

"I am not unsupportive of President Trump’s contesting the election, but I’m not willing to overlook arguments that don’t make sense."

If we reverse all of the negatives above, here is what appears:

I am supportive of President Trump’s contesting the election, and I’m willing to overlook arguments that do make sense.

Still a bit hinky, even with all of the negatives removed, noob. Clarity is important.

[PATed]

If you look at the timestamp we’ve been discussing for the range of Trump votes across all 1,702 precincts from low to high, there are a few precincts at the beginning where President Trump got zero votes, and then some more where he got very few votes (like 1 out of 76). The biggest precinct where he got zero votes is 34-08, with 110 Biden votes and 0 Trump votes.

Then the Trump ratio rises steadily through the 1,702 precincts until it reaches precinct 26-02, where Trump received more than 85% of the vote.

So the real question is whether it’s possible that Trump received zero (or close to zero) votes in a small number of Philadelphia precincts. I think that it’s possible in a place like Philadelphia (just like I would imagine there are other areas of the country with some precincts that voted 100% Trump).

[MHGinTN]

Light’em Up!

[PATed]

You must be fun at parties.

[Truthoverpower]

Court. Soon. REAL TESTIMONY. UNDER OATH. NO MEDIA

[Candor7]

There’s no secret Philly precinct that is 90% for President Trump to which secret “ratios” are being applied to change the vote. >>>>>>>>

Not reallym the ratio in any precinct of 99% Biden and 1% Trump is not a naturally occurrung distribution. Neither is 100% Biden and 9% Trump.

Generally 20% of Democrats voted for president Trump, more or less by a few percentage points.This was born out by questionnaire survey data compiled at Trump rallies.

You joined FR for 2nd amendment purposes?
Then I say you are a Johnny one note troll.

Are you wealthy enough?You won’t be able to afford the proposed Biden gun tax of $200.00 per gun, nor the ammo tax of 1000% over price.Nor will you be able to drive far to hunt of shoot either, with 7 dollar gas at the pump.

Enjoy wishing ill to the Trump cause. Your enjoyment likely will not last very long.