Posted on 11/20/2020 10:19:58 AM PST by SeekAndFind
There have been a lot of questions raised about fraud and irregularities in this election.
But one of the reasons that people question is also the other numbers and results in the election.
One of the things that isn’t getting a lot of coverage in mainstream media is just how well the Republicans did, contrary to predictions. While even Fox, incorrectly, projected a Democratic gain the House on Election Night, in fact, as we reported, the Republicans picked up at least 12 seats and will likely have more before the final count is in. Of the four remaining House races to be determined (how are they not determined yet!), Republicans are leading in all four and likely to get 15, which would give the Democrats a bare majority by just a handful of votes.
As Cook Political Report explained, there were 27 races in the House considered “toss-ups.” Not only did Republicans win every single one of those toss-ups but they also picked up seven of the 36 seats that Cook had predicted as “likely Democrat” or “lean Democrat.”
In the Senate, of the seven toss-ups, Republicans won five, the other two are the Georgia races still to be determined in January. They also won all four races that were “lean Republican.” Which means they only need one of the races in January to hold their majority.
Even in the statehouse races, Republicans won “almost every election where redistricting was at stake” and didn’t turn any statehouse while Republicans did flip the Senate and the House in New Hampshire, as the Washington Examiner observed.
“Republicans are set to control the redistricting of 188 congressional seats — or 43 percent of the entire House of Representatives. By contrast, Democrats will control the redistricting of, at most, 73 seats, or 17 percent,” Silver wrote.
The Republicans scarcely could have done any better than they did. By any measure, it was a “red wave.” Far different from what Democrats or media were predicting.
So that should, one would think militate for a Trump win, along with all the other bellwether numbers such as consumer confidence, enthusiasm and incumbent advantage. Should we believe that the battleground states somehow have such a vastly different result from these other races where Republicans prevailed? Should we think that Trump had a 94 percent approval rate among Republicans but that all these folks who voted for House and Senate Republicans didn’t vote for him in the critical states? That all those other numbers that based on historical precedent predicted Trump all just failed in the final analysis?
Here’s Steve Cortes raising the point about the House, as well as pointing out some other bellwether numbers that pointed to Trump.
Bellwether counties add to the long list of election anomalies that ALL somehow line up in Biden’s favor. My latest breakdown on the numbers…pic.twitter.com/zvfI3Nq8RI
— Steve Cortes (@CortesSteve) November 20, 2020
The problem, of course, is that while a Biden win may not appear to make sense and the stats militate against it, you still have to be able to show the evidence in order to be able to flip it.
To add a few others.....
JusttheNews just had a piece yesterday that said Rasmussen polling just found that 1 in 3 democrats believe a special counsel should be appointed to investigate the Biden corruption allegations. Apparently 1 in 3 democrats believe Biden may be corrupt.
Trump IMPROVED his numbers from 2016 across the board. Trump had the most support from registered democrats since Reagan.
Many on the far left fringe DO NOT support Biden and see him as a corporate plant. Many Bernie Bros did not vote for HRC so why do they vote for Biden?
Biden generated almost no enthusiasm. The enthusiasm gap might have been the highest I’ve ever seen.
Despite all of this, we are supposed to believe that Biden got more votes than Obama?
Yeah, something is not right.
Sarah Hucklebee? Seriously?
Well Sarah Whoever: her point on the 90,000 to 100 only votes for President (and all of those going to Biden) defies any rational explanation. These Battleground races were poisoned.
From this article: Election Fraud Expert Russ Ramsland Files Affidavit Showing ‘PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY’ of Election Results in Michigan:
5/ “The final red flag is perhaps the greatest. In the data are 4 spikes totaling 384, 733 ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hours and 38 minutes. This is physically impossible given the available equipment at the 4 reference locations.”
The affidavit is claiming that it was physically impossible to push that many ballots through the few machines they had in the time period that was reported.
-PJ
One of the rationales I’m seeing for the massive Biden vote dumps is that they’re the mail in ballots which favored him.
Are there similarly large dumps in states other than the disputed swing states?
Yes. Questions?
then, please, someone explain why they showed up in giant, pro-Biden chunks in the middle of the night....and ONLY in swing states where Biden was trailing...and IN EVERY state they appeared, Biden staged huge comebacks and ended up ahead in the vote. If this can't be adequately explained, then I'm convinced cheating explains all of this.
Apparently 1 in 3 democrats believe Biden may be corrupt.
I’m guessing 1 in 3 Democrats voted for Trump.
We know a lot of them did, yet despite all of this we are to believe that he no energy campaign of an almost 80 year old life-long politician got the most votes in election history?
I’d be really interested to see the president-only ballots in contested states vs nationally. The numbers should be similar, but I have a feeling that they’re just as lopsided.
bump for later
My thoughts exactly. I’ve seen a post that compares only a handful of states but I don’t have the time to research all the states.
If this rationale is true, then that same pattern would be repeated all over the country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.