Oh what a crooked web we weave,
when 70 million voters we try to deceive!
Posted on 11/17/2020 8:56:32 PM PST by Wish2Post
We’ve reported on multiple incidents of ‘glitches’ that people were observing related to the reporting of the 2020 Presidential Election. These incidents seem odd and so we sought out a data set from the 2020 Presidential election and we found it. A group of IT patriots had already analyzed a data set of election vote data and found millions of votes in the election that were either lost or transferred from President Trump to Joe Biden.
[IN SUMMARY, at end of article:]
Again, it is completely INCONCEIVABLE mathematically and statistically that after the switch in the lead to Biden, batches of votes would have exactly the same distribution to both candidates.
What is going on with the data and the votes recorded in the 2020 election? These patterns observed in multiple states make no logical sense other than that data is being manipulated in the greatest election fraud in world history.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
why come on these threads if you diss them....go do something else...go be negative someplace else....
Thank you. Guess I was too tired to do all that work! But wow, what a conclusion and such a very tiny margin!
Those stupid throw away lines...”let me know when someone is in handcuffs” are infuriating.
For Heaven’s sake get a a NEW LINE...
>The FReepers on this thread sure are sarcastic and complacent in the face of losing their country to the CCP.
Resigned to the inevitability of war with enforcement of the next major socialist pronouncement. Won’t last long. Blue holds little territory, no resources it doesn’t import, huge useless self-destructive populations.
The Gatewaypundit claimed that every single vote batch after the Biden dump had the same ratio Biden vs Trump (50.051% vs 49.949%). That is not quite true - and that reveals how the figures were obtained.
Let's look at the first set of votes after a lot of votes disappear from Trump's column. At 22:01:41Z Biden gets 2371 votes and Trump 2366 votes. (I don't know why the program decides to show that in decimal format, ie 100s votes, rather than in integers, but that's how they do it.) Now Biden's ratio of those votes is 2371/(2371+2366) = 2371/4737 = 50.053%
That's close but not quite the ratio in the column. Trump's ratio is 2366/4737 = 49.947. Again close but not quite there.
OK, let's look at the next batch. Biden gets 49 votes and Trump gets 49 votes. No difficult math there; 50,000% each. Again, close but not cigar.
Let's do a third one. Biden gets 889 votes, Trump 887 votes. Biden's ratio is 50,056%, Trump's ratio is 49.944%
Really, that is not correct. Can the program not carry out proper divisions?
Well, let us look at it from another point of view. Assume that the programmer has decided that from the time points later than 22:00:40Z Biden's share of the vote batches shall be 50.051% then we have the first batch coming in:
A total of 4737 votes gives Biden 0.50051 x 4737 = 2370.92 votes. However, votes, even in this program, must be integers, so Biden gets 2371 votes, and Trump does not get 2366,08 but 2366 votes.
Thus, the figures in the columns "Incremental vote democrats" and "Incremental votes republicans" are incorrect if one assumes that they are calculated from the number of votes. However, if the votes are calculated from the predetermined percentages then the figures makes sense given the rounding off errors.
Oh what a crooked web we weave,
when 70 million voters we try to deceive!
Including Joe and Ho if they knew about the fraud!!
Fake News
Fake Election
Fake Senate(No Filibuster)
Fake Judges (Court packing)
Fake States (DC)
Fake Elections(corruption of process by law)
Fake America
Get your criticism in now before the executions and reeducation camps get started
More from Mr Hope-Porn
You could argue the hand counts are fraudulent (no supervision). Then how did they pull off a hand fraud to match the machine fraud? Did they signal exactly how many votes they needed for each candidate to the counters? Very difficult.
Alternatively you could argue they created enough ballots on the night of the election to match the machine fraud. Possible. It would be easier to simply create the fraudulent ballots and run them through a machine with no algorithmic bias.
And there we have the explanation. They create fraudulent ballots by taking failed scans and transcribing them onto blank ballots without supervision by Republicans. We know they did that in Philly.
But nostly they harvested ballots and turned them in. Dead people voted. People got multiple ballots and sent them all in. We know all of that happened in all the swing states. The simplest explanation is the best one especially since we can now show the machines were unbiased in Georgia.
The articles from GP are good at ignoring facts. We now have numerous hand counts that match Dominion machine counts. That should end the Dominion speculation. But no.
btt
“Call me when someone is in handcuffs.”
You say that like you expect a call.
Me neither.
1) Recount in Georgia gets the same numbers as the first count.
Do we know that? Is the recount tabulated on some website?
(And what program(s) is(are) used for that?
2)You say the machines did not bias the results. OK, true if the ballots are real ones, but as you mention yourself there are plenty of possibilities that they are not, especially the mail-in ones.
3) I assume that it is impossible to count the same ballots, in the same order as on election night and the following days, so therefore there is no way to check those exact ratios, just the total number of ballots.
4) Would it be possible to falsify the number of ballots needed? Well, it depends how many. And here I am just speculating, because I do not know exactly how the voting and counting procedure is carried out.
The huge batches of Biden votes (acc. to GP) must in all likelihood have been produced elsewhere than on the counting station, unless everyone present were involved. However, for the votes during the "silent period" they could have been summed after a number of batches, and then a vote card is not uploaded, enough to maintain the correct difference between Biden and Trump. In this way you may also maintain (roughly) the correct amount of ballots in comparison to votes cast.
This may sound too complicated, but maybe that is not so in Georgia where there were so many Dominion machines, and therefore the number of corrections would not have had to be that large per machine. It is a guess, but at least it could explain the lost and found vote cards....
What is absolutely certain is that the number of votes were calculated from the percentages, not the other way around, unless one maintains that the computer program is not able to carry out normal divisions. If that is the case there are a whole lot of other problems.....!!!
Thus, the figures in the columns "Incremental percentage democrats" and "Incremental percentage republicans" are incorrect if one assumes that they are calculated from the number of votes. However, if the votes are calculated from the predetermined percentages then the figures makes sense given the rounding off errors.
This is Gateway Pundit, so you can take it to the bank this time! /s
If you’re on the side that thinks fraudulent votes should count, then you’re on the side of liars, cowards, sissies and pansies who will melt away when the real fight comes.
You sound like you have no idea what you’re talking about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.