"But proof that that is what happened in our election."
When will she present it? Time is running out. Bring on said Kraken, please.
Posted on 11/17/2020 4:41:22 AM PST by EyesOfTX
Sidney Powell drops some bombshells on Lou Dobbs.:
Transcript:
POWELL: I’ve just got some stunning evidence from a witness, a high-ranking military officer who was present when Smart-Matic was designed. And I’m gonna just read you some of these statements, if you don’t mind, so I get them exactly right:
From the Affidavit: Designed in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumbprint or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter’s name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the changed vote.
He made it clear that the system would have to be set up but not leave any evidence of the changed vote for the specific voter, and that there would be no evidence to show, and nothing to contradict that the name and the fingerprint or thumbprint was going with a changed vote. SmartMatic agreed to create such a system and produced the software and the hardware that accomplished the result for President [Hugo] Chavez.
After the SmartMatic electoral system was put into place, he closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated using the SmartMatic software. Once such election was in 2006, when Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over Rosales, a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez, vs. 3.7 million for Rosales.
In 2013, he witnessed another Venezuelan national election where the SmartMatic system was used to manipulate and change the results. In a control room where multiple digital display screens were shown for results and voting, the actual voting results were fed into that room and onto the displays over an Internet feed, which was connected to a sophisticated computer system created by SmartMatic.
People in that room were able to see in real time whether the votes that came through the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from any specific area or as a national total was going to be against either candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulating computer had the ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one candidate to another by using the SmartMatic software.
[End]
Now, that is indeed stunning if true. And if Sidney Powell is on TV reading it, I have no doubt at all that she believes it to be true.
But here’s the problem: It’s an affidavit signed by a witness whose identity we don’t know. If this is all Powell and the Trump team of lawyers have to present on the matter, it will not likely convince a judge or panel of judges to take any action at all.
Later in the interview, Powell goes onto allege that the same SmartMatic/Dominion system has been used to change the outcomes of elections all over the world, and alleges that the CIA would have to know about it if this was indeed happening. Unfortunately, when pressed on that allegation towards the CIA and its potential complicity, Powell only responds that “it’s simple logic.” Which is true, but which also is not going to convince any court in America to take any action absent some documentary evidence.
She and Dobbs both also point out the fact that former vice-admiral Peter Neffinger is the chairman of SmartMatic, and also now sits on the steering committee for the Biden/Harris Harris/Biden transition team. This is also very interesting and frankly shocking, but in and of itself will not be likely to convince a judge to do anything.
Next in the interview, Dobbs reveals that he has received news from an unidentified “source” who he describes as “highly reliable” that the FBI has a team “looking into” the conduct of this election. Yippee! Our dumpster fire FBI is “looking into” it! So, maybe 5-6 years from now we might see some kind of “report” on it all, but more likely it will come to nothing given that a real investigation would benefit the Bad Orange Man everyone in DC is trying to get rid of.
Again, all of this is very interesting, and I have little doubt that most, if not all of the allegations coming from the Trump team are true.
But – and there is always this “but” – they will be asking a series of judges, probably all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States – to take radical, unprecedented action to basically either reverse or disqualify the vote counting in several individual states. In all of their interviews over the past week, I have yet to hear Powell or Rudy Giuliani talk about having anything more than witness testimony in their possession.
These are all bombshells for sure, but if witness testimony is all they have, then their court cases are destined to fail. Obviously, no smart lawyer is ever going to reveal their whole case publicly before a trial, and all we can do is hope that Powell, Giuliani and their team have been holding some even bigger bombshells in their hip pockets.
That is all.
LOL
Let’s just say you have less credibility than Sidney Powell.
Your backgrounds is exactly what?
Talk is cheap, as are posts.
Talk is cheap, as are posts.
Precisely.
Are you a parrot?
The money I spent is a bet that we can get President Trump elected by showing election fraud. Otherwise my money is thrown away.
Icon donation success 20 11/17/2020
WinRed
Succeeded Info
$50
Icon donation success 20 11/17/2020
WinRed
Succeeded Info
$50
Icon donation success 20 11/06/2020
WinRed
Succeeded Info
$50
Icon donation success 20 11/06/2020
WinRed
Succeeded Info
$50
NOW POST YOURS.
Please Note: You can view any donations made on a WinRed page on your account by following these instructions:
Log into your account: https://app.winred.com/profile
Select the Account button on the upper right-hand side bar.
Click History on your donor dashboard.
Your history of all of your donations should be listed below.
Are you a parrot?
So no bet? We're not talking about what we're wanting the outcome to be, we're talking about what the outcome will be.
Your background to challenge common sense is exactly what? If you think the US Supreme Court is going to throw out a national election based on some witness testimony prepare for disappointment.
If you think the US Supreme Court is going to invalidate tens of thousands of mail in votes based on the changing of PA election law through judicial fiat you are on firm ground. Similar deal in GA. That is clear unconstitutional activity.
Again what is your background?
You did not answer the question, therefore, I deem your testimony is as non responsive.
Again what is your background? I deem you irrelevant to the discussion as I don’t see you posting anything of substance. If you disagree with my fairly informed opinion please grace us with yours.
As I've posted before, the problem with this conspiracy is that the keepers of the evidence are the people who are implicated by the evidence.
Normally, people with decision-making authority who are implicated in malfeasance are asked to recuse from making decisions affecting them.
That doesn't seem to be the case with election officials or Secretaries of State where suspected voter fraud has taken place.
The alleged criminals are allowed to stop the audits that might find their criminality, and then the Supreme Court has cover to say there is no evidence to rule on.
-PJ
LOL, you mistake disgust at people like you with failing trust. You just exposed yourself, Judas. In your dead soul you think betting and winning some twisted measure is more important than keeping America. I am confident in telling you, Do Not take the Mark when commanded to you, IF you survive the chaos caused by the Departure of The Redeemed. It will have eternal consequences and at that time there will not be any of the Redeemed around to warn you in person, so here’s your sign.
“How solid is ACB? Would she recuse herself, as Trump recently appointed her?”
Don’t know. My gut feeling is she is less likely than Kavanaugh to want to win the approval of leftists, but we’ll just have to wait and see.
I guess you are having comprehension difficulties. You asked about a bet. I have made one, wagering my money on an outcome.
Have a great evening.
In your dead soul you think betting and winning some twisted measure is more important than keeping America.
Do not allow your fervor to outweigh your logic.
Don’t take the mark if you survive to be commanded to do so.
"But proof that that is what happened in our election."
When will she present it? Time is running out. Bring on said Kraken, please.
Your fairly informed opinion?
You know all the discovery that is being collected?
You know all the witnesses and their testimony?
You know pattern analyses and how to apply it live voting data?
You know algorithms and how to apply them?
You know all parties involved with Scorecard, Hammer and Dominion?
I doubt you know what you don’t know. Until you are privy to the discovery, witness testimony, technical analyses, etc you have no clue how SCOTUS will rule.
Unfortunately you could fill a library with books written on what people said they had and what they were going to do. And in the end nothing was provided and nothing was done. I suspect that's the case here.
???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.