SCYTL RAID In Germany

Various ^

[TigerClaws]

@replouiegohmert reveals US Army (CIA?) team raid on Scytl server facility in Frankfurt, Germany to recover "extremely compelling" data detailing vote switching.

THREAD for updates

[DiogenesLamp]

Louie Gohmert says it himself.

https://youtu.be/LyyQqeRJC58

[DiogenesLamp]

I should add, that is why the Sec. of State says that the election is secure, because a printed ballot from the machine which is inspected by the voter exists which can later be hand recounted.

What do they do about mail in and absentee voters? Because that's where I think most of the fraud is.

[PIF]

I was under the impression that all electronic voting was NOT to use the internet for anything. When did this start?

—
It started when it was set up - the whole air gap business was a myth or based on bad reporting. The were also supposed to be security features but they were either never implemented or only partially installed since there were never any standards established. System patches were often never done. This left the systems open to malware like Qsnatch which is untraceable.

All the election electronic voting system are not only connected to the internet. but connected at every point of data transfer; despite company brochures to the contrary these are among the most insecure systems in the world - you PC might have better security.

[Steve Van Doorn]

Michael Flynn attorney Sidney Powell says she has “staggering” statistical evidence and testimony to show Dominion voting machines altered ballots and this deception stems back to Venezuela, Cuba, and China. She’s says “I’m going to release the Kraken.”

https://twitter.com/danielchaitin7/status/1327384533428285441

[MHGinTN]

You keep trying to plant a misdirection. The machines taking the votes is not at all the point to focus upon. And I believe you know that and are playing a magicians trick, trying with your technique of repetition to turn focus away from the way the vote switching was done.

The machine taking the ballots is not where the vast fraud occurred. It is not what HAMR and Scorcard were designed to accomplish. I believe you are an agitprop given the task of diverting attention from the real massive fraud, onto the machines which are not the central issue of the cheating/fraud/criminality.

And by the way, Georgia is not doing an audit, they are counting votes and their little scam will not and is not designed to expose the massive vote switching.

[LilFarmer]

The SOS is rushing it through for the very purpose of hiding the flaws of Dominion. Counties were told to have counting done by 3 tomorrow, certified by 5. Slight of hand.

[TigerClaws]

Yes. GA is rushing to hide the real fraud.

The “smoking gun”. (the Kraken) is the Dominion vote stealing.

Instead of proving up 100,000 individual cases of fraud (tough to do) the hacking is the KILL SHOT for this litigation.

[TigerClaws]

Yes.

If true, the servers could show the hacking that took place and could prove up the exact number of votes that were stolen.

Expect flak as this is the true target. It shows possibly a state actor and gets us to 100s of thousands of votes in an easy way — not through individual affidavits and testimony for weeks.

Note. how no MSM has covered it!

[LilFarmer]

This is why the GA SOS is ramming the recount through and not checking signatures. They have until 3 tomorrow to finish the count and 5 pm to certify. Slight of hand.

L. Lin Wood just filed a lawsuit against him in Federal court for his deal with the dems to not verify signatures. Wood argues it should nullify the election

[dfwgator]

Somebody will eventually talk.

[Sense]

Your entire argument fails when you add “and the Absentee ballots I suppose”...

The entire effort in Georgia is a fraud... because it was conducted without oversight. Conducting a faux “audit” now while sustaining the fraud of conducting it without oversight... means it is still a fraud.

Don’t even need the technical details of why you are wrong about a shell game “proving” there is no pea...

[Sense]

“If you know a way to identify a fraudulent ballot from a valid one, let me know.”

That’s easy...

You COMPLY WITH THE LAW... by allowing observers to observe, including that it is THEY who are supposed to be checking signatures. Checking signatures is the way ballot fraud is stopped... and the way ballot fraud is enabled in Georgia, is by disallowing the proper oversight THAT THE LAW REQUIRES.

[Sense]

That lawsuit “should” work in Georgia, if the Judge is on the up and up. But it won’t if the judge is in the tank ? Same logic as the suits in Pennsylvania addressing the original Constitutional grants of powers being the issue... as state officials (and judges) don’t have the power to rewrite the laws directing how elections work... says the U.S. Constitution.

Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court got it wrong. A lower court then stepped up to correct them... with Alito’s backing ? No one much commenting on the lower court judge seriously dissing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s clear error ?

If the suit doesn’t work at the local level... all that does is generate another harm to be adjudicated... giving you another reason, if not the reason, that you want and need to have in hand to take Georgia to the SCOTUS for a butt whipping.

Signing up volunteers for that role ?

Much of what you see now... is probably the Kabuki Dance of aligning the issues to have them be resoundingly resolved at that level...

Can’t take too much other value from that as content having linear value... rather than non-linear value in defining the structure of the disputes that will be heard by SCOTUS.

The left are loudly dismissing Trumps wins as “minor”... in Pennsylvania, they say it doesn’t matter because its only impact is on a couple of votes. That’s clearly deliberately ignoring the reality... as the issue in principle applies FAR more broadly than in only adhering to a few specific votes...

Here’s the “small” NY Times, shrinking even more:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/07/us/politics/the-supreme-court-hands-trump-a-small-victory-in-pennsylvanias-vote-count.html

Here’s the Wall Street Journal, pointing out the issue is “Who Writes Election Law” not who got a vote here or there:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-supreme-courts-pennsylvania-cleanup-11605050501

But, if Alito stepped in to put THAT finger on the scales in Pennsylvania... and Georgia just ignores that ? Hmmm.

[LilFarmer]

Yep, where PA goes legislatively, GA will follow, I believe.

[Jane Long]

Praying so!

[Sense]

I’d only caution that the structure of the fraud appears intended to exploit boundary expectations, as if Dominion and Scytl are real competitors, so cannot be seen as cooperating... when in fact the “competition” among the election services providers looks a lot more like a division of spoils than real competition... particularly in terms of (the lack of real) security, where the “quality of effort” is easily demonstrated as being a bad joke.

It will require a bit of forensic network analysis to decipher the nature of the relationships that are coded into the software of various providers... and to compare that with the actual flow made apparent in stored data and log files...

But, the obvious that is available because “some” of the Scytl software provided us a real time feed of the fraud as it was being practiced ? CNN showed it to us ? They’ve tried erasing it ? But, that’s actually a crime, too ? They used to call that obstruction of justice... back when a perp trying to erase the data showing how they committed the crimes... still mattered to a Grand Jury ?

But, they got out their Hillary cloths and wiped it ?

Is that gonna work... again... ?

[Sense]

I hope that’s true...

But, again... I’d caution that there’s little utility in addressing the issues while posturing them as a party line vote based on partisan affiliation... instead of addressing the need to INVESTIGATE and respond appropriately to the PROBLEM OF FRAUD...

Without fully exposing the fraud... as necessary in justifying the votes of the legislators... ?

Proper consideration of the NEED FOR and VALUE OF the legislators votes... has to be carved into the vote itself... so that it cannot be disposed of as a partisan issue, rather than a substantive issue... in each instance.

[TigerClaws]

Didn’t Scytl go bankrupt? And then who took them over? And why are foreign countries having anything to do with our elecdtions?

Hope FISA warrants came in handy... finally!

[Sense]

Down in the weeds in the details, now... but...

I remember Hillary saying, months ago, that the election would look like a Trump win... and then turn out not to be ?

How could she possibly know that... months ago ?

Just because “our strategy” would make that happen ?

OK. HOW ???

Somewhere between mens rea... and conspiracy theory... that must connect to reality, somehow ?

[Sense]

Scytl says, or said, they’re bankrupt, looking for money:

https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/11437-66#timeline

Not clear to me what that means in terms of Spanish law, or European law, or if any changes might have occurred in their status since whenever it was that was posted ?

I haven’t poked at it at all, yet... but there is an open question or two to address...

One, of course, in the absolute TRAVESTY of the fraud that any of these companies are “secure” in any meaningful way.

They are not secure. And that’s VERY WELL KNOWN... has been well covered by media efforts over the years... with the evidence only showing things have gotten worse, not better, over time.

Why the bankruptcy, itself, or other changes in ownership, or changes in structure or function tied to acquisitions, dispositions, or “deals” done that changed functional relations... didn’t trigger immediate government action in relation to considering OBVIOUS risks tied to fundamental infrastructure security... clearly seen in the instance given the OBVIOUS sensitivity in much of what Scytl does ?

DHS and CISA efforts ensuring “infrastructure security” are A MASSIVE FRAUD... Just a joke.

But, your direct question ? That’s about CFIUS... the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. Same outfit as greeen-lighted Hillary’s sale of uranium miners to Russia in return for kickbacks to the Clinton Foundation... while she was Sec of State... and while she was directly responsible for the committee, which is run by State.

How it is possible that foreign investment was EVER allowed to put foreign owners in a dominant position enabling control of the outcome of U.S. elections is a good question.

I don’t know the answer...