Posted on 11/13/2020 11:04:23 AM PST by TigerClaws
@replouiegohmert reveals US Army (CIA?) team raid on Scytl server facility in Frankfurt, Germany to recover "extremely compelling" data detailing vote switching.
THREAD for updates
I went there. Here is what is listed:
1. Audit/Recount does not include signature review
2. They're only allowing 1 state inspector to oversea 10 audit/recount team
3. Concerns about access, not just building but actually visibility of the audit process
4. They're planning to certified all ballots at 5PM while the audit is ongoing.
5. Public Notice request to delay to NOV 16, 2020.
6. Paper ballot chain of custody.
Please notice that there is NOTHING in the above that says the hand recount is not going to catch machine fraud. That is the point of my post(s). The audit, canvassing, and full 100% ballots hand recount will not add up to what the machines reported if there was machine fraud. Yes, there are other problems, but you don't always get 100% of what you want.
The fact remains that if the Trump team thinks there is machine fraud then the great news is that the GA hand recount is going to expose it. But you have to be open to the thought that it might just show that there isn't any machine fraud. If you count it on the machine and you count them by hand and the two results are within reason of each other, then there you go. No machine fraud and that can be taken off the Trump list, and that coupled with the loss of GA pretty much ends this election.
But maybe it does show that there was machine fraud, we should be glad to know one way or the other.
lol I'm with you. But I also want to know whether to put any kind of faith into things like "SCYTL RAID In Germany". I'm going to know by next Wednesday if that is just bull crap or not. And I want to know too.
Interviews and video from GA on Bannon’s War Room.
No addresses on envelopes.
The audit was a Risk-Limiting Audit, which is described here: http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3905493/posts?page=25#25
A real audit would have turned up some of the fraud, what they are doing won’t
The SOS agreed to 1 worker for 4 tables Wednesday and changed the rules yesterday to 1 to 10.
There is a lot more about our sos:
He is the one who selected Dominion.
And he made a deal with Democrats in March 2020 saying that signatures only have to match the envelope. He in essence changed voting laws without the legislature https://demdoc2.perkinscoieblogs.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/07/GA-Settlement-1.pdf
He did nothing about the GOP observers being kicked out election night either.Those votes should at the very least been secured and set aside review.
He’s been saying from day one the numbers are accurate (how does he know?) and there were no credible claims of fraud which is not true because i know people who had people vote under their name.
*********
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1327362579472277505
Lin Wood
@LLinWood
I filed a lawsuit today in federal court in Atlanta to establish that the March 6, 2020 Consent Agreement by the GA Secretary of State rendered UNLAWFUL the 11/3 GA general election.
I am right under established law.
2020-11-13 Complaint - L. Wood v. Raffensperger et al.pdf
Shared with Dropbox
dropbox.com
3:27 PM · Nov 13, 2020
Knowledge is your friend LilFarmer. Yes, there are ways to not count 100% and check accuracy. But BE IT KNOWN, that GA is doing a 100% HAND RECOUNT OF ALL EXISTING BALLOTS, and not a smaller sample as indicated in the link. That is an extraordinary step by the SoS regardless of his past. It will turn up machine fraud if that is present. I feel good about that either way it turns out. Since I am a GA resident, I want my vote counted. Regardless of politics, I think the 100% hand recount audit and canvass will turn up any significant errors and fraud that might have occurred with the initial count.
DIdn’t say there were.
“DIdn’t say there were.”
LOL
“no checking or matching of envelopes with signaturrs, addresses,”
Without a real audit, a hand count just counts fraudulent ballots.
I want my vote to count too, which is why I wanted an audit and recanvass BEFORE the recount that is happening now.
By the way, counties were told to have their counts certified by tomorrow which has the RNC pretty ticked.
Note this article from The Gateway Pundit. Read it through please. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/paul-sperry-pro-biden-bug-also-suspected-georgias-vote-counting-software/ “It’s a good first step,” Favorito said. “A recount will be able to determine if there was electronic vote fraud.”
The comment is from the person who thought only a 100% hand recount could be depended on in GA. Well, that is what we got!
If you know a way to identify a fraudulent ballot from a valid one, let me know. The BEST we can do is identify the total quantity of potential fraud and compare that to the vote difference. If it is substantially more than the difference, then the courts might listen.
I saw a story this morning saying that Trump has filed an action in PA, I think it was, claiming the election is unconstitutional for the reason that numerous constitutional requirements were intentionally violated....or maybe it was in MI.
Regardless of where, if the election can be ruled unconstitutional the decision will be made by the state house of representatives and the majority of them are republican.
If it is ruled that the methods violated the requirements of the Constitution the validity of the ballots will be a moot point.
Regardless of where, if the election can be ruled unconstitutional the decision will be made by the state house of representatives and the majority of them are republican.
If it is ruled that the methods violated the requirements of the Constitution the validity of the ballots will be a moot point.
I saw something about that. You and I both know it is a long shot. I would much rather something easier to grasp happen, something like the GA recount showing a big difference proving machine fraud. Then you have the whole country saying "Oh ****". But I am thinking that is a long shot too. But we are spending the money and the effort here in GA, so I am proud of at least that and waiting for the results.
“They had said they would do an audit. Instead they are doing just a ballot reshuffle, with only 1 GOP observer allowed per 10 tables, no checking or matching of envelopes with signaturrs, addresses, and so forth.”
What is your friggin’ problem?
Leave me alone and go direct your idiocy elsewhere.
Don’t forget that the latest appointees to the supreme court will, if they serve as they represented themselves, be much more interested in upholding the Constitution than they are in counting ballots and determining which are valid and which are not.
The Constitution may yet save us.
“What is your friggin’ problem?
Leave me alone and go direct your idiocy elsewhere.”
1. I like to verify anonymous claims.
2. You posted to me first.
Scytl: “We do not have servers or offices in Frankfurt”
Scytl is lying:
Open CMD on windows. Type in “Tracert www.scytl.com”. It’ll show you: Tracing route to scytl-ewb-1171565827.eu-central-1.elb.amazonaws.com [52.57.209.147] over a maximum of 30 hops.
Ctrl+c to stop.
Now Type the 52.57.209.147 into the box in https://www.maxmind.com/en/geoip-demo. It shows its located in:
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany, Europe
There you now verified and checked out the IP location yourself.
Ms. Powell says she’s about to “release the Kraken.”
https://mobile.twitter.com/raiklin/status/1327387035716476929?s=10
Scytl: We are not owned by George Soros and have never been connected to him
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3484751/posts
Since that was written, there have been organizational changes... but it appears that Scytl’s sales of election related software might be a simple “rebranding” of software “sold to them” by Soros. The definition of the business relationships between Scytl and the Soros owned companies is left deliberately murky in their descriptions of them... but Scytl wasn’t avoiding proofs of “being connected” to him back in 2016... which is a lot closer to 2020, temporally, than “never”.
In the event... it appears Scytl is a Soros client company... rebranding Soros owned election software functions as “part of” their own product... when perhaps they’re only rebranding Soros “software as a service” ?
Hard to know what the actual nature and full extent of the relationship is...
Not hard to notice that Scytl is lying about it...
I ran across this topic too and wrote it up:
Observers who can’t observe... aren’t observers.
Seems pretty obvious, and well enough validated in precedent... that the failure to properly empower observers in the original election, and the failure to empower observers in the “faux audit”... are essentially of the same cloth... invalidating the legitimacy of the process... including the certification... only having the certification being a knowing crime if they do cross that threshold ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.