Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MIT PhD Analysis Reveals 138,000 Votes Switched from Trump to Biden in Michigan — MUST SEE VIDEO
Gateway Pundit ^ | 11/10/2020 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 11/10/2020 8:27:18 PM PST by SeekAndFind

The Gateway Pundit has reported on numerous events in the 2020 election which are being referred to as system ‘glitches’ in the media.

Last night we provided another ‘glitch’, this time in Wisconsin, which if reversed would eliminate Biden’s reported vote lead in the state.

Tonight we have obtained an unaudited analysis of data available for all the states looking for system glitches and other oddities in vote counts related to the Presidential race only.

Last night we reported on another so called system ‘glitch’, this time in a county in Wisconsin. Evidence was provided to us that showed that the vote totals for Rock County appeared to be switched between President Trump and Joe Biden. 9,516 votes were eliminated from President Trump and moved to Joe Biden. This 19,032 vote difference when corrected would eliminate Biden’s lead in Wisconsin.

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: System ‘Glitch’ Also Uncovered In Wisconsin – Reversal of Swapped Votes Removes Lead from Joe Biden

In the post last night we also identified issues we’ve reported on in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia where similar ‘glitches’ occurred.

We next attempted to obtain more data on this issue so we could determine how widespread this issue may be and/or if there are reasonable explanations for what is occurring.

Then tonight we were led to a site on the Internet (https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/) where someone who had seen our posts decided to do an analysis himself.

In the piece the author claims his work is a full list of votes switched from Trump to Biden or votes erased by Dominion (the vote machines used in many states across the US).

(The author claims that his work has been verified but we have not verified the results so we currently are labeling his results “unaudited.”)

The author decided to obtain the data himself and perform an analysis of national votes switched from Trump to Biden and votes erased (the total amount of votes counted decreased by that amount throughout the counting).

Based on this initial analysis over 500,000 votes were identified that were switched from President Trump to Joe Biden.

In addition to this another 2,865,757 votes were deleted.

Note that these numbers have not yet been audited by us.

On Tuesday Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PhD, the Inventor of Email, Scientist, Engineer, shares the results of his team’s mathematical analysis of four major counties votes in Michigan in the Trump-Biden election that reveals an unfortunate truth of U.S. voting systems.

Dr. Shiva and his staff found evidence of Trump-to-Biden vote-switching of 138,000 VOTES in Michigan.

FULL PRESENTATION (highly recommended):https://t.co/f2K4bYtxO0

— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) November 11, 2020

Dr. Shiva also found that the more solid Republican precincts saw more Trump votes switched to Joe Biden.

Here is the full video:

CLICK ABOVE ARTICLE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: analysis; electionfraud; michigan; mit; voterfraud; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: AndyJackson

I read very fast, for effect.


21 posted on 11/10/2020 9:06:00 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

thedonald.win found Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408

this number is far less than Dr. Shiva’s numbers for wisconsin.

So none of this stuff makes sense.


22 posted on 11/10/2020 9:06:51 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The video gives an astonishing graphic picture of the Scorecard algorithm in action.

The almost exact duplicate picture of the slope of the distribution line of precinct accumulating totals is clear evidence that this algorithm was used in many states. There are NO examples of votes switched from biden to Trump ALL the switching was from Trum to biden.

23 posted on 11/10/2020 9:07:08 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

The media is not blind, they are complicit in the coup attempt. It is SYSTEMIC TREASON.


24 posted on 11/10/2020 9:08:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bookmark


25 posted on 11/10/2020 9:09:40 PM PST by Chgogal (#DisruptBidenÂ’sBananaRepublic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

That is so predictable from you. You are too stupid to comprehend the video presentation so you smear the man and by inference the other two men in the video.


26 posted on 11/10/2020 9:10:08 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I hate to say this, but part of what is driving the media, I think, is not just being full of hatred for Trump or being the stooge of a foreign government, but just the desire for novelty, a new face, something else to write about. Trump to them is a known quantity (though unpredictable). How about a new face? Never mind the price.

This reminds me in some ways of how the press behaved in 1976 (reaching way back in history) with Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter was NOT Ford, not the past, not tied to Nixon and memories of Watergate. He was a blank slate. Let’s bring on Jimmy. The press cheered on Carter.


27 posted on 11/10/2020 9:12:52 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

The reason the cheaters ran more switching in Trump heavy districts was to keep the percentages in line. Think about it, if you’re trying to keep the differential at around 3%, any large Trump turnout would make it hard to switch votes elsewhere to make up for the differentials statewide, so you just keep applying the algorithm even in in unlikely biden vote areas.


28 posted on 11/10/2020 9:15:11 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We need a county breakdown to know where to go for evidence.


29 posted on 11/10/2020 9:15:51 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

It sounds like the old fractional voting fraud that had been exposed years ago.


30 posted on 11/10/2020 9:16:02 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

IF you watch the video presentation, pay attention to the slope of the graph in counties where the algorithm was used. In Wayne county the alforithm was not used. Instead manufactured fraudulent ballots were shipped. So the graph for Wayne county does not have a slope of distribution.


31 posted on 11/10/2020 9:18:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

I don’t think a “new face” is driving the MSM fraud at all. It is a China-allied, globalist, Deep State cabal that wants to stop Trump from wxposing their decades of fraud AND overthrow our constitutional government for Big TechnoPharma globalist, communism’for-the-little-people control.


32 posted on 11/10/2020 9:20:14 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
You are too stupid to comprehend the video presentation so you smear the man and by inference the other two men in the video.

I am smart enough to know that no one who knows what he is talking about talks about computer glitches when he is describe a systematic feature of software. Absent erratic hardware performance software does what it was programmed to do. It's not a glitch. It's intended. And the numbers and facts are more or less available elsewhere so I don't need to listen to this 4 PhD crank to know what is going on.

The man is a crank and posting anything by him diminishes what was otherwise a sound and credible argument that deliberated vote tabulations are shifting large numbers of vote - which is election fraud, pure and simple.

End of story.

33 posted on 11/10/2020 9:21:46 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

You know what this reminds me of?

Have you ever read Jim Thompson’s The Grifters? Or seen the (1990) movie?

One of the main characters, Lilly, works for an off-track betting operation. Her job is to go to the racetrack and lay huge sums of her employer’s money on the long-shot horses, to reduce their odds, so the payoff will be close to the original track odds the off-track bookie has set up.

That’s what this reminds me of. Trump is a long-shot horse with huge odds for payoff, and she’s there to reduce the odds.


34 posted on 11/10/2020 9:21:56 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

We already know that without needing to give this 4 PHD crank
[to be redundant] credit for it.


35 posted on 11/10/2020 9:22:54 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

And that was introduced with the Diebold machinery!


36 posted on 11/10/2020 9:23:53 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
138,000 was suggested as a minimum.
37 posted on 11/10/2020 9:24:02 PM PST by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

presumably the same 138,000+.
this is the “fact-checking” spin, which claims it’s false...because they got caught and fixed it!

4 Nov: Politifact: Tweets stated on November 4, 2020 in a tweet:
Says Joe Biden received a sudden influx of 138,339 votes in Michigan while Donald Trump received none
By Bill McCarthy
The screenshots showed a change in the vote tallies as they appeared on the elections map powered by Decision Desk HQ, an election data and analysis service. The photos appeared to show that in one update overnight, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden received a sudden influx of 138,339 votes in Michigan while other candidates received none...

In reality, the influx of 138,339 votes for Biden referenced in the social media posts were the result of a data error, said Drew McCoy, a spokesperson for Decision Desk HQ. They were not indicative of voter fraud, mysteriously surfaced votes or other nefarious actions by Democrats.
“It was a simple error from a file created by the state that we ingested,” McCoy said of the viral screenshots, noting that Decision Desk HQ does not make changes to state-provided files.
“The state noticed the error and produced an updated count,” McCoy said. “Once they did, we updated the count accordingly. This happens on election night, and we expect other vote tabulators in (Michigan) experienced this error and corrected in real-time like we did.”

The correction appears to be reflected in tweets Decision Desk HQ sent as the results trickled in from Michigan on Nov. 4. In one tweet posted at 5:04 a.m. EST, the service reported 2,130,695 votes for Biden and 2,200,902 votes for Trump. In another tweet at 5:43 a.m. EST, the service reduced the vote count for Biden, putting him at 2,019,899 votes to Trump’s 2,217,540...

“This kind of funkiness is typical,” said Alex Halderman, a professor of computer science and engineering and elections security expert at the University of Michigan. “Preliminary results are sometimes updated manually by copying and pasting from a spreadsheet. The error could simply be that one candidate’s totals were updated but not the other’s.”...

We rate such claims False.
PolitiFact Michigan reporter Clara Hendrickson contributed reporting to this fact-check.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/04/tweets/no-biden-did-not-receive-thousands-mysteriously-su/


38 posted on 11/10/2020 9:24:11 PM PST by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The entire video is excellent! Thanks for posting.


39 posted on 11/10/2020 9:24:14 PM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MAGAthon

should have said “allegedly fixed it”. I wouldn’t know.


40 posted on 11/10/2020 9:25:44 PM PST by MAGAthon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson