Posted on 11/09/2020 11:38:14 PM PST by mazz44
Correct. Im wondering what Piecenik is doing. He is the real deal, but this stuff just doesnt make sense. Maybe its psyops.
___________________
The Dem-Rats had to of known that PDJT was going to investigate.... Maybe what’s going on now is just a head fake to let them think that the investigation is off in the wrong direction.
I suspect that this is going to have more layers than the sedimentary rock in Grand Canyon....
THe only thing in this story that should be obvious are the many National Guard that are surrounding the polling places and keeping the ballots safe. I don’t live in any of the questioned states...has anyone noticed the National Guard? I haven’t seen them on the news that I can detect.
He is referring to the mail-in ballots for certain states
Maybe a parachute assault coordinated with rhe 82d Airborne Division... I might lose a lot of associates but they too need be taken out. I can do the COMSEC Audit for agency and State.
Speculation;
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2004003853A2/en
Abstract “Machine-readable light-colored or invisible, but luminescent, postage-evidencing symbology and dark, readable other postage information are printed, preferably in a single print operation, to provide large amounts of information without diminishing read rates....In a preferred form, the images are printed using conventional ink jet printers using water-based inks. In one embodiment of this type, the images are printed with a conventional two-cartridge color ink jet printer by printing postage-evidencing symbology with a single-color ink and printing the visible dark image as a composite dark color from a standard multi-color cartridge.”...Snip
Note** that USPS generally uses a Black ink for mail routing bar codes, although I have seen luminescent yellow ink on envelopes that is sort of visible.
and:
http://www.digitex.is.it/en/servizi/inchiostro-invisibile-e-sistema-di-rilevamento/
...snip
“- High reliability: our InvInk system works perfectly both on the side of creation of the invisible references, that is made by a spray systems controlled by a microprocessor, and for what concern the spots automatic detection, always reliable and possible at any speed....
...Snip...
- Flexible and configurable: The system for invisible tagging and automatic detect, in its standard configuration, allows many simple regulations to modify the spot size and shape and the amount of ink used for each spot .
....snip. (More at at link.
(**Note as discussed their system is designed for high speed labeling and process and control operations.)
So, It is Possible, however:
***Objections to 1):
a) Requires intervention by printers of ballots, OR, after receipt by the State or County officials in charge of sending out the mail in ballots. (Invisible ink coding after state or county receipt of blank ballots.)
b) could a ballot reading machine distinguish between the visible ink voter choice and invisible Biden choice and choose the invisible over visible if both barcodes were next to or even on top of each other on a ballot?? This would be a software review issue IF they find invisible ink markings.
2) Mail in Ballots envelopes sent to Republicans have something to mark them segregate them to assist in special handling (Spoliation.) Could be invisible or visible ink? (Could be just a pencil mark on outside of envelope I suppose if info is relayed to counting centers.)
Aid from someone at the Postal service operating the high speed sorting machines? Pubbie ballots get their own Tray.
(Note this story: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/08/20/postal-service-mail-sorters-removals)
At the counting center, once the ballot is separated from the envelopes the envelopes and evidence are then destroyed.
****Objections to 2) Again possible, but more steps and more people involved. (Entity issuing the Mail ins, collusion with Postal Worker in Sorting Facilities, relay and special handling of the trays.
CONCLUSION: If Trump’s lawyers have access to ballot (or envelopes) then the ballots should be checked for some form of invisible ink coding to rule out the possibility of manipulation. (If they get a lot of resistance to checking for invisible inks this they should definitely check!)
Most of these folks have no understanding of what blockchain means, or how it works.
Yet, if you discuss “bitcoin”, these same people will tell you its a fraud and ponzi scheme.
What is it folks?
Many commercial printers have updated to a digital printer. As such, they are required to watermark. It is a required currency / anti-forgery protection. However, not all print shops have update to the digital printer format, so there are likely shops that do not.
To take advantage of the water mark technology, there would need to be a requirement for ballots to be printed in a controlled manner. Only approved printers, using water marks, with crypto hashes of the serial number printed on the ballot.
Any ballot that does not comply with the above standard is tossed.
As for one part of the authors claims:
“The ballots used in the election were printed by the Department of Homeland Security.” “Every legitimate ballot across America was watermarked with QFS blockchain encryption codes.”
Not true. The states handled their own printing, with no assurance they followed any DHS advice whatsoever.
And a good part of the massive fraud did not occur with anything that was printed. It occurred in the computer systems from the local all the way up to the servers handled by foreign owned and operated outside contractors with severs housed in Barcelona Spain and Frankfurt Germany.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.