Breaking! Another System ”Glitch” Captured Live on CNN on Election Night – 20,000 Votes Swapped from Trump to Biden (Video)

GP ^ | November 9, 2020 | Joe Hoft

[White Lives Matter]

HUGE BREAKING NEWS – System ‘glitches’ caught real time

We already know there were at least two system ‘glitches’ in Michigan during the 2020 election. First in Antrim County and then in Oakland County votes were switched between the Republican and Democrat candidates always in favor of the Democrats.

Over the weekend a video was being passed around the Internet and on social media from the 2018 gubernatorial election in Kentucky where votes are swapped between the candidates and captured live on CNN. By slowing down this video, Internet sleuths uncovered votes for the Republican candidate were switched to votes for the Democrat candidate. The number of votes seemed small but in this incident this vote swap was a quarter of the difference between the candidates’ final vote counts.

Now this morning a video has been uncovered from this year’s Presidential election in Pennsylvania where the same thing appears to have occured. Nearly 20,000 votes were subtracted from President Trump and added to Joe Biden, a 40,000 vote swing, live on CNN.

[rfp1234]

Yes. GOP leads in House delegations, 26-24.

[The Fop]

So then I would assume you’ve never written any books about the power of positive thinking LOL

[Hieronymus]

Could you please block my account. Thanks

---

That is one I hadn’t imagined. It recalls a Bloom County cartoon where conservative college students under Reagan are rioting while carrying placards reading “Bash Our Heads In.”

[Shethink13]

Just in fairness, it’s entirely possible that the person entering data for the TV network made an error, and that it was not an actual error in the official count.

Not if they never corrected the error. Is there video evidence of the votes switching back?

[Fair Paul]

How is this calculated? If there are say 3 Republican house members and 2 Dem house members from a given State, this State would then be part of the 26?

[I still care]

I was wondering if there could be a reason for it, other than cheating. I doubt it. But someone should then come forward - by NAME - not a faceless entity - and state their error. Isn’t this done by computer?

And how come this always seems to favor Democrats?

[Crucial]

This IS good news. We’ll see where it leads.

[mlo]

TV graphics are not official vote counts.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Don’t know. I’m just saying that numbers flipping on the tv screen isn’t proof of fraud in the official count.

[ptsal]

Bkmk vote

[Migraine]

Offer a million dollar reward for information leading to conviction on charges of engaging in vote fraud.

[reformedliberal]

How is this calculated? If there are say 3 Republican house members and 2 Dem house members from a given State, this State would then be part of the 26?
________________________________________
I believe it is legislative and executive control.

[reformedliberal]

I’m just saying that numbers flipping on the tv screen isn’t proof of fraud in the official count.
___________________

The vote count is the OFFICIAL tabulation available to the media, the states and the Feds. They are all connected to the same tabulation.

This is even more damning of the press, because enough of them saw exactly the same thing, even when the broadcast cameras flipped away.

IOW: this wasn’t concocted by some graphics department at a network.

[Fair Paul]

Thank you

[SomeCallMeTim]

The democrat that was in office was Andy Beshear himself. :)

No... Andy was the Attorney General at the time. Our Sec of State was Alison Lundergan Grimes. She's a great friend of the Clintons. Go figure.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Honestly, that's not what I saw in that link. What I saw was CNN's own graphic. I don't believe all those graphics are tied in directly to each state's computers because I've seen before where some networks have more recent numbers than others. That wouldn't be the case if it was all automated updating.

I think each network has people who read data from whatever source they're using, and then types that data into their own graphic. So if they screw up, it'll come up wrong and need to be changed. Those kind of errors where they are just switching huge vote totals would be much too easily discovered during reconciliation of the precinct numbers.

In any case, I don't think that was the type of errors/fraud that occurred. I think what happened on a massive scale was essentially ballot-box stuffing using mail-in ballots.

[rfp1234]

Exactly.

For example, the rats have an overall majority, but waste most of it in California and NYS where their advantages are huge. In AK, MT, WY, SD, etc. the GOP delegation wins 1 to 0.

[Windcatcher]

Like a lot of people, I write software for a living. Let me say something.

This isn’t the 1950’s. There are no software “glitches” today. Modern electronics are exceptionally reliable.

Software today does what it’s told. What we’re seeing here is outright fraud via either a backdoor or hidden algorithm. Plain and simple.

[Fresh Wind]

Just in fairness, it’s entirely possible that the person entering data for the TV network made an error

What are the chances that one candidate loses the exact number of votes that the other candidate gains?

That doesn't sound like a random entry error.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Depends on how it was reported to them. New totals, or new additional votes? If it was the latter, then it would just be adding votes to the wrong side.

Again, that just seems like a really odd/obvious way to cheat, and very easy to catch. Those totals come from precincts, and the precinct numbers all have to add up to the final total in the end. So if there is cheating, it is almost certainly happening in the precinct level. Or at least the county level for mail-in votes.

That kind of deliberate fraud is just to easy to track and correct.