Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING - 8th Circuit Overrules Minnesota Supreme Court — State must reject all absentee ballots received after 8 pm on Election Day
https://www.citizenfreepress.com ^ | 10.30.2020 | Kane

Posted on 10/30/2020 2:32:35 PM PDT by rxsid

8th Circuit Overrules Minnesota Supreme Court — State must reject all absentee ballots received after 8 pm on Election Day

 

BREAKING: The 8th Circuit appeals court is forcing Minnesota to reject all absentee ballots received after 8 pm on Election Day.— Kambree (@KamVTV) October 29, 2020

 

The US Circuit #CourtofAppeals for the #EighthCircuit has ruled that mailed-in ballots in #Minnesota must be received by elections officials no later than #ElectionDay. It's the latest last-minute judicial #ballot ruling impacting a #battleground state pic.twitter.com/AKmK6KJ99F— Tina Kim (@TinaKimCNN) October 30, 2020



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2020election; 8thcircuit; absenteeballots; ballots; election; electionfraud; maga; minnesota
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: MTsumi

Not a chance the SC will overrule and allow late ballots, ESPECIALLY now that ACB is sitting. She said there’s no reason to recuse.....although Ds baseless speculation that she’s made a deal the DjT.


41 posted on 10/30/2020 2:55:20 PM PDT by chiller (Davey Crockett said: "Be sure you're right. Then go ahead'. I'm going ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MTsumi

If the state supreme court is ruling based upon the laws of the state, then the supreme court must side with the state courts.


42 posted on 10/30/2020 2:55:21 PM PDT by joe fonebone (Communists Need To Be Eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
  1. Left loses election.
  2. Left sues to have late votes counted. 2/3 of them are manufactured.
  3. Left appeals up to Supreme Court, who knows what Roberts does, left says Amy should recuse, she won't, and is deciding vote or it's 6-3.
  4. Loot
Alternatively I wouldn't be surprised if Supremes refuse to hear it UNLESS they need to overturn an overturning. If lower courts uphold these decisions, supreme's may say 'sorry, we're done being America's legislative branch.' Same result though -> loot.
43 posted on 10/30/2020 2:55:49 PM PDT by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

She recused herself from the PA ruling citing unfamiliarity (too new?).


44 posted on 10/30/2020 2:56:40 PM PDT by MTsumi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pilgrim's Progress

ACB recused herself from the NC case because she had just joined the court and was getting her footing.


45 posted on 10/30/2020 2:57:21 PM PDT by EliRoom8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

I wonder if they’ll take it to the Supreme Court

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


46 posted on 10/30/2020 2:58:45 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu
If California grants 16 year-olds the vote, they get to vote.

That is only true for state and local elections. States cannot change the age requirement for federal elections.

47 posted on 10/30/2020 2:59:58 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Only appeal left is to SCOTUS.


48 posted on 10/30/2020 3:00:50 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

This is going to end up at Scotus and I don’t see how different states can allow votes to be counted under rules given the equal protection clause .

Each state has different laws. Some states do allow ballots postmarked by election day to be counted. Apparently, Minnesota does not and that is why the 8th circuit slapped them down.


49 posted on 10/30/2020 3:01:04 PM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: billorites

It’s astounding, as if the election date has snuck up on voters.
If your life is so disorganized you can’t mail a ballot on time, you shouldn’t be voting!


50 posted on 10/30/2020 3:01:44 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: frank ballenger

Well, no one else on this thread has said so so far, but that was pretty funny. .:)


51 posted on 10/30/2020 3:01:54 PM PDT by untenured
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Joe Biden: “Gzblonaoplkrazporish!”

Senile Joe shouts pure gibberish today

[6 second video to share with your denialist family and friends.]

Joe Biden: “I’ll lead an effective strategy to mobilize grzblonaoplkrazporish!”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvgOYmKCm2c&ab_channel=DonaldJTrump


52 posted on 10/30/2020 3:02:23 PM PDT by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

That was before ACB. This case will probably include her vote.


53 posted on 10/30/2020 3:03:01 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

“If the state supreme court is ruling based upon the laws of the state, then the supreme court must side with the state courts.”

Yes and no. The Constitution gives sole authority for determining the “Time, Manner and Place” for federal elections to the state legislature. So if state law gave that responsibility to some other government official, it could be constitutional under their state constitution, but unconstitutional under the Federal constitution, and due to the Supremacy clause, the Federal constitution would prevail.


54 posted on 10/30/2020 3:04:15 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Enforces? Who even checks to see whether they are doing as the 8th Circuit ordered? (checking to see what comes in the mail after the 8 pm deadline and/or the postmarks etc.)


55 posted on 10/30/2020 3:05:09 PM PDT by Let's Roll ("You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality" -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

Was NC a 4-4 vote or a 5-3?


56 posted on 10/30/2020 3:05:48 PM PDT by EliRoom8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Send in the National Guard.


57 posted on 10/30/2020 3:06:33 PM PDT by tennmountainman (TThe Liberals Are Baby Killers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MTsumi
Assuming ACB recuses again, this may get reversed.

The reason she recused herself is, the arguments and part of the deliberation were made before her appointment.

The Minnesota issue will be new to SCOTUS and she will be fully qualified to hear the case along with the other justices.

58 posted on 10/30/2020 3:07:30 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MTsumi

“She recused herself from the PA ruling citing unfamiliarity (too new?).”

No, the motion had already been briefed before she was seated, so she did not participate in that decision. But that was not a decision on the merits, merely whether or not to expedite the case. The case is still before SCOTUS, and may be resolved after the election. In the interim, PA has ordered that all ballots arriving after the statutory deadline must be segregated, marked as arriving late, and not counted until the case is resolved. ACB will be able to participate in deciding the case.


59 posted on 10/30/2020 3:07:58 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

If state law says ballots must be received by 8:00 pm on election day to count, then any judicial demand otherwise is illegitimate. If those ballots are counted, then the election loses whatever legitimacy it might have had. In that case, I expect this to get far uglier than even what the far left is threatening.


60 posted on 10/30/2020 3:07:58 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson