Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: srmanuel

I’m mostly tech illiterate. Does 50-150 give one the ability to do what the average Internet Joe spends most of their time doing... streaming Hulu?

Also, if a clear sky is required, this could turn out to be about as reliable as wind turbines.


4 posted on 10/27/2020 10:07:51 AM PDT by mn-bush-man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mn-bush-man

Yes it more than adequet for most people. If you have multiple people in a household all doing there own thing then it could be a problem.


9 posted on 10/27/2020 10:11:13 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mn-bush-man

Yes. Those mbps are more than adequate for the average household.


10 posted on 10/27/2020 10:12:26 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Click my screen name for an analysis on how HIllary wins next November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mn-bush-man

50 would allow something like 10 HD simultaneous HULU streams. The latency would mean gamers would be able to use the service and have decent ping times. As far as weather, it may impact speed during storms but I dont know how much. I suspect you wont be able to get 10 streams but surely 3 or 4 during anything short of a hurricane.


13 posted on 10/27/2020 10:14:01 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: mn-bush-man

No,. 75+ terabytes a month is common for cord cutters.


19 posted on 10/27/2020 10:21:16 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson