VIDEO: Absolutely Neutral Referee Chuck Todd Compares Trump and Biden Campaigns

YouTube ^ | October 22, 2020 | DUmmie FUnnies

[PJ-Comix]

VIDEO

Neutral referee Chuck Todd plays it so straight down the middle that you can't tell which candidate he favors in this report comparing the two campaigns. Nope. Absolutely no bias can be detected on his part.

[PJ-Comix]

The bias has become so great that MSNBC now runs Biden campaign ads during their "news" segments. Basically a DONATION to the Biden campaign.

[PJ-Comix]

PING!

[adorno]

Okay, here’s the deal...

When talking about any reporter/pundit/’journalist’/analyst who work for the left-stream media...

There should be a letter identifying/labeling their political leaning, sort of how politicians are identified...

So, Chuck Todd should be labeled as Chuck Todd (L), or Chuck Todd (D); L being for liberal or D for democrat.

They work for the democratic party, even if they don’t want to admit it openly.

[GOPJ]

FOX needs to do the same.

When I'm watching Sunday with Chris Wallace I want to know if the panel is Chris (democrat) along with 2 other democrats and a 'neverTrumper' like Goldberg.

Talent and guests need to be labeled so liberals can't lie as easily to the people as they do now.

It should be democrat (D), Republican (R), Progressive (P) NeverTrumper (NT).

If a person has gotten to the point in life where they're invited to a news show and they claim they don't know what party they affiliate with they should be dis-invited -- because that means they're a liberal liar who wants to fake out conservatives.

The name with 'titles' should appear when the person is introduced... with liberals names in white with a 'blue' backgroud and conservatives in white with a 'red' background...

AND you're totally right adorno - the labeling system MUST apply to ALL on-air 'talent'... Especially those creepy liberal women who love to express 'great concern' for Trump and his base when they're liberals and we know they hate us.

[pepsi_junkie]

I get that you are talking about who they support rather than their party registration but it's worth looking back to the past and how they registered. In the old days, like 10 years and prior, it was known and publicized that the press were well over 90% registered democrats. Eventually they caught on to the optics of that and if you look now you will see that they almost all register as independents.

So you can't point to a record on paper and say 'he's a democrat' anymore. But could it be that they are all secretly still democrats?

[Mark]

On a totally different topic, I just wonder how Ukraine is doing on the Globull Warming front? Well it gets to a topic that can come about in the debate.

[adorno]

So you can't point to a record on paper and say 'he's a democrat' anymore. But could it be that they are all secretly still democrats?

The "record" should be how they talk and analyze, meaning that, if they defend and support a liberal or democrat or progressive or communist, and they do it regularly or all the time, then, the RECORD speaks for itself, and the label of L or D or P or C or R or C or even I (independent), should be applied to the names, in print and on TV and even of the radio. Most people are smart enough to know what's what, and can't be fooled, so, why not make it official?