Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I've been away from the news the past few days so pardon me if I'm coming into this conversation late.

I figured I'd ask you as a fellow long standing FR member who's opinion I trust.

I know she's a very strong pro-lifer which checks a big box for me. I've read in the past here on FR that there are some concerns about her Second Amendment views. Am curious to know your thoughts. Others on this thread she's strong 2A and for stripping non-violent felons of their right to bear arms.

Is this true?

106 posted on 09/20/2020 7:23:21 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: usconservative

https://www.google.com/search?q=amy+coney+barrett+second+amendment&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS918US918&oq=amy+coney+barret+se&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0.7744j1j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett#:~:text=Barrett%20stated%20that%20while%20the,violation%20of%20the%20Second%20Amendment.

Barrett stated that while the government has a legitimate interest in denying gun possession to felons convicted of violent crimes, there is no evidence that denying guns to nonviolent felons promotes this interest, and that denying such rights is a violation of the Second Amendment.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/amy-coney-barrett-ginsburg-scotus-future.html

Similarly, there is no doubt that Barrett would dramatically expand the Second Amendment, invalidating gun control measures around the country.

https://originalismblog.typepad.com/the-originalism-blog/2019/03/second-amendment-originalism-from-judge-amy-coney-barrettmichael-ramsey.html

History is consistent with common sense: it demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns. But that power extends only to people who are dangerous. Founding-era legislatures did not strip felons of the right to bear arms simply because of their status as felons. Nor have the parties introduced any evidence that founding-era legislatures imposed virtue-based restrictions on the right; such restrictions applied to civic rights like voting and jury service, not to individual rights like the right to possess a gun. In 1791—and for well more than a century afterward— legislatures disqualified categories of people from the right to bear arms only when they judged that doing so was necessary to protect the public safety. ...


119 posted on 09/20/2020 9:14:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals. -E Snowden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: usconservative

No, she wrote the decent when the appeals court striped non-violent felons of their 2A rights. She say she did a deep dive into the second A rights the determined that there was no constitutional reason to stripe non-violent felons of their second A rights. This tells me she is strong believer of both the Constitution and it’s Second Amendment. She says she is a strict originalest(sp) and I believe her.


139 posted on 09/20/2020 10:06:29 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson