p
I don’t think I’ve ever said this but there needs to be hangings if any of this is true
I so totally hate the Democrats.
Lieutenant General Vindman? Did he get a promotion while I was asleep or something?
Isn’t there a name for this, s
tarts with a “T” ends with “reason”?
Well, thank you so much, El Caudillo.
Use this to clear out most of those O-7 to O-10 promoted by Obama.
ECONCOM
Woodward went off the deep end a long time ago. I’d expect pretty much everyone he quotes in his book will deny Woodward’s claims.
He’s getting us out of too many useless wars....crazy man.
Mattis... the big talking “bachelor”.
I thought Mattis was a great pick for SecDef, and I based it on a couple of books I had read and a few interviews I had seen him in long before he was even being considered.
I was terribly disappointed when he came all out for open homosexuality and support of transsexuals in the military, and realized I had to be utterly wrong about him.
If any of this is true, he is far, far worse than I had ever imagined him being. I am shocked and astonished. I know I shouldn’t be, given what I have seen up to now, but this...
”since Trump is “dangerous. He’s unfit.”
The above has noting to do w danger or fitness, what this means is that PDJT is not part of the Club.
And YES, it is treason.
I DON’T THINK MATTIS HAS EVER HAD RESPECT FOR THE CHAIN OF COMMAND.
The Commander-in-Chief is the President - which Mattis ignored and still does.
Mattis worked for the President. In his resignation letter letter never mentioned that. He mentioned the troops but never acknowledged the man he worked for.
Trump fired him because after giving him 9 months to come up with a withdrawal plan for troops in the Middle East, Trump came to learn that Mattis totally ignored that “order” and that Mattis acted as though the President worked for him.
Mattis, you are a low-life, insubordinate, disloyal douchebag.
Wow, Woodward threw General Mattis under the bus, saying worse things about him than President Trump ever did.
I remember calling Dan Coats office and asking specifically what is/was the nature and extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election. It would be an understatement to say his office was not forthcoming.
Aside from the fact that it’s Woodward, there’s only 3 people who could have divulged this supposed conversation, Mattis (unlikely), Coates (probably), or the ever present unnamed source who heard it from someone else. I’d be inclined to find a good bit of truth in this story formthe fact that we have a conversation between two named people and Woodward is noting it. That said, Mattis is and was a grade 1 POS, he should probably be hung or shot and he’s also a fag. Was never impressed with him.
Let’s see what Mattis says in the next few days.
I missed today’s media kerfuffel, something about Woodward’s book. But, it seems to be over with already. Is this story from the same book? I bet this will be over with by the time I get up tomorrow. These hit pieces just seem to lob overhead like a flying buzz bombs. You start to ignore it after a while.