Skip to comments.Why is Obama Panicking Now? – The Importance of Understanding Political Surveillance In The Era of President Obama…
Posted on 05/09/2020 7:02:19 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot
Why is former President Obama calling forth all his defensive resources now? Why did former national security advisor Susan Rice write her cya letter? Why have republicans in congress not been willing to investigate the true origins of political surveillance? What is the reason for so much anger, desperation and opposition from a variety of interests?
With the release of recent transcripts and the declassification of material from within the IG report, the Carter Page FISA and Flynn documents showing FBI activity, there is a common misconception about why the intelligence apparatus began investigating the Trump campaign in the first place. Why was Donald Trump considered a threat?
In this outline we hope to provide some fully cited deep source material that will explain the origin; and specifically why the those inside the Intelligence Community began targeting Trump and using Confidential Human Sources against campaign officials.
[Read the whole longish article, your head will be spinning.]
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
It is an even deeper dive than Mollie Hemmingway's article "Obama, Biden Oval Office Meeting On January 5 Was Key To Entire Anti-Trump Operation" at The Federalist (link from Free Republic).
Biggest “smidgen” in US history
Molly’s timeline is so great I bookmarked her article.
The Demo/garchs DO NOT yet have sufficient control of the govt........ and that control is slipping daily.
All of this was supposed to happen under Hillary.....they never counted on Trump and are obsessed with removing him from office.
<><> The Demoslobs were planning going to turn the world into a police state one way or the other before the election.
<><> The world, via the Internet, is getting wise to their trickery, they are out of time, period.
<><> The Demogarchs absolutely cannot let Trump get in for a second term.
<><> The slobs are cashing in on the virus-—suspending civil liberties,
<><> getting Democrat goons to LEGISLATE our rights into the dustbin of history.
If it hasn’t been scrubbed yet...
here’s an audio file of the Stutterer-in-chief (Barry Insane O’Bungler)
I’m still trying to count all the “I’s” in this clip
Some habits die hard, I Suppose!!!
Every one of those bastards in the lower picture belongs in jail.
Seriously hope they all end up in prison ‘til their last breaths.
The above letter (h/t brown deer) is why 0 is panicking.
This whoooole thing is the reason for the extreme Trump Derangement Syndrome we’ve seen, and the reason Trump has faced more baseless, unhinged resistance, just because of who he is personally, than any other president in history.
He’s not part of the Washington club. He’s financially independent and not beholden to the DC cocktail party circuit and doesn’t care about what the left thinks of him.
They’re worried he’s going to blow up their little commie-wannabe world and bring about the end the democrat party, possibly with many of them in jail by the time it’s over.
To view President Obama’s involvement in spying on Candidate Trump, click the link below:
There should have been another picture of all the Republicans (Paul Ryan in the front-and-center lead) who let this farce going on for so long.
THEY don’t/didn’t want to know, they don’t/didn’t want to see Trump succeed. ===> It will (and it has) blow up all the GOPe lies of WHY they can’t do this or fulfill that campaign promise(s).
He didn’t want the next President to undo anything he did in his 8 years, so he went after the next President.. Now look at him today.. he can see his “reputation” and all he faked into being... gone/reversed... and it’s about time!!
They got rid of Nixon for much less than what barry has done.. and it doesn’t matter that he is past President.. he still lives off the people and off the position.. strip him!!
Does anyone in Washington have what it takes to give obama what he’s earned!
They panicking out there, I can feel it. Look at em.
Both of you are way too generous.
Me? I am more of a blood-thirsty kind.
I want all of them pay, and pay dearly. Not just sitting and rotting in jails.
I think they’d like it a lot less than just getting it all over with.
Not against your idea though.
The perpetrators, including Obama,. now find themselves in extreme jeopardy, so Obama is spreading disinformation. here is what Obama wrongly organized for Flynn :
1) A crime with no predicate.
2) falsification of FBI forms 302
3) FBI investigator notes which indicate political motivation
4) Meetings at the highest level in which Rice revealed in her memos what strategy was to be followed, Obama,Biden, Comey, Rice, Clapper and Brennan were present at a series of such meetings.
5) Obama now taking to the media posturing himself to limit his exposure to liability, ( He will pay big time)
Add this up and it is but one result: Malicious Prosecution#
Because it involved organizational crime and racketeering, the extraordinary remedies available from a RICO offense are obvious.
And the various perpetrators of this crime , include a law firm which acted in conflict of interest ( Flynns original legal team that advised him to plead guilty), FBI Agent Strzok, Comey, McCabe,Yates, Rice, Brennan, Clapper and Obama himself. All of the perpetrators exceeded their governmental authorities of office so that the legal jeopardy is personal, the government nor the taxpayers are liable for these millions of dollars in damages. All of the perpetrators are personally liable in the millions of dollars. (Not to mention the federal crimes of sedition, treason and espionage, and the likely disbarment of several attorneys involved in Flynns original defense team.)
I expect that letters pleading settlement have already been received by Flynns legal counsel. For the benefit of America, I hope General Flynn proceeds to a public civil trial in a malicious prosecution suit for damages.Let them all lose their homes and livelihoods in return, for that is indeed what Justice demands.
Malicious prosecution is an intentional tort designed to provide redress for losses flowing from an unjustified prosecution....
Under the first element of the test for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution at issue was initiated by the defendant. This element identifies the proper target of the suit, as it is only those who were actively instrumental in setting the law in motion that may be held accountable for any damage that results....
The second element of the tort demands evidence that the prosecution terminated in the plaintiffs favour. This requirement precludes a collateral attack on a conviction properly rendered by a criminal court, and thus avoids conflict between civil and criminal justice. The favourable termination requirement may be satisfied no matter the route by which the proceedings conclude in the plaintiffs favour, whether it be an acquittal, a discharge at a preliminary hearing, a withdrawal, or a stay. However, where the termination does not result from an adjudication on the merits, for example, in the case of a settlement or plea bargain, a live issue may arise whether the termination of the proceedings was in favour of the plaintiff....
The third element which must be proven by a plaintiff absence of reasonable and probable cause to commence or continue the prosecution further delineates the scope of potential plaintiffs. As a matter of policy, if reasonable and probable cause existed at the time the prosecutor commenced or continued the criminal proceeding in question, the proceeding must be taken to have been properly instituted, regardless of the fact that it ultimately terminated in favour of the accused....
Finally, the initiation of criminal proceedings in the absence of reasonable and probable grounds does not itself suffice to ground a plaintiffs case for malicious prosecution, regardless of whether the defendant is a private or public actor. Malicious prosecution, as the label implies, is an intentional tort that requires proof that the defendants conduct in setting the criminal process in motion was fueled by malice. The malice requirement is the key to striking the balance that the tort was designed to maintain: between societys interest in the effective administration of criminal justice and the need to compensate individuals who have been wrongly prosecuted for a primary purpose other than that of carrying the law into effect.
WE should dig up Nixon and give him back the 3 years of his Presidency that were taken from him,
but only AFTER Trump is given back the 3 years that were stolen from him
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.