Posted on 05/01/2020 7:12:00 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
On March 20th Dr. Fauci “corrected” President Trump during a press briefing on hydroxychloroquine saying, “You got to be careful when you say ‘fairly effective.’ It was never done in a clinical trial… It was given to individuals and felt that maybe it worked.”
Dr. Fauci quickly corrects Trump’s misstatements about hydroxychloroquine pic.twitter.com/Piim1PQSdh
Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) March 20, 2020
Dr. Fauci was skeptical of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness in treating the novel coronavirus.
But he wasn’t so skeptical back in 2013.
In fact, Dr. Anthony Fauci CHEERED the use of hydroxychloroquine when it appeared effective “only in cells in lab dishes” in treatment of against MERS.
Fauci, now so sour on hydroxychloroquine (+/- azithro) for covid19, despite its clinical promise, gushed in 4/2013 when a coronavirus [MERS] antiviral combo [ribavirin /interferon-alpha)] tested only in cells in lab dishes prevented viral replication! https://t.co/c9aN1b0nvZ pic.twitter.com/KBTLDUeIUW
— Andrew Bostom (@andrewbostom) April 4, 2020
Dr. Fauci thought a 2013 test in a “lab dish” was particularly encouraging.
But in 2020 after several successful studies of hydroxychloroquine’s effectiveness in treating coronavirus patients he was suspect.
Hydroxychloroquine is cheap, effective and easy to administer.
On Tuesday the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) released a report endorsing hydroxychloroquine saying the drug has about a 90% chance of helping COVID-19 patients.
But as we reported earlier this month Dr. Fauci has his own favorite, the more expensive Remdesivir by Gilead!
Via American Greatness:
Recent history provides too many examples of institutional failure. We have already examined how lacking Dr. Anthony Fauci is now and has been before and during the HIV/AIDS crisis. He is a fraud. Whether he is a crook or a fool is perhaps open to interpretation.
Despite President Donald Trumps enthusiasm for the drug hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus, the federal funding powerhouse led by Dr. Anthony Fauci isnt spending any money on it, and clinical trials for it are lagging behind other drug studies, CNN reports.
Instead Fauci has been touting Remdesivir from Gilead through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Gileads Remdesivir costs thousands of dollars and works less well than hydroxychloroquinea generic that has worked all over the world. Remdesivir requires intravenous administration and has stronger side effects.
Why is the good doctor pushing a bad cure?…
…Fauci works closely with Gilead and other drug manufacturers. Once again Gilead has helped advance Faucis public persona while he has advanced their drugs, sometimes even against the interests of the U.S. government or HIV/AIDS patients.
Fauci even praised a Gilead television ad for Truvada, or PreP, a $1,000-a-month drug. Its illegal in most countries for pharmaceutical companies to advertise, but Fauci found much to like in the ad. He had reason to. After all, his organization funded the study with your money.
Fauci has also spoken at events funded by Gilead and other pharmaceutical companies.
Later, President Trumps HHS sued Gilead alleging that the drug manufacturer had profited from millions of taxpayer funded research dollars against the interests of patients. Gilead lost the suit right around the time it needed a new drug to help it take off. With few drugs available for the coronavirus, Daniel ODay, Gileads new CEO only been on the job monthsturned to Remdesivir, a drug marketed toward solving the Ebola virus. Remdesivir failed at that, too. Indeed Congolese officials found too expensive and too ineffective compared to cheaper alternatives.
The results were most striking for patients who received treatments soon after becoming sick, when their viral loads were still lowdeath rates dropped to 11 percent with mAb114 and just 6 percent with Regenerons drug, compared with 24 percent with ZMapp and 33 percent with Remdesivir, wrote Wireds Megan Molteni.
We reported on Fauci and Gilead on April 7th.
Today Dr. Fauci excitedly endorsed Remdesivir for treating coronavirus!!
The Hill reported:
Gilead Sciences said Wednesday it is aware of positive data emerging from a clinical trial studying one of its drugs as a potential treatment for COVID-19.
The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseasess study of remdesivir, an experimental antiviral, has reached its primary endpoint, Gilead said, meaning the drug was found to be effective in the trial.
The institute, which is headed by Anthony Fauci, a key member of the White Houses coronavirus task force, is expected to release more information Wednesday, Gilead said.
The study, which began in February, is evaluating the safety and efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalized adults with COVID-19.
There is no proven COVID-19 treatment yet, though hundreds of clinical trials are ongoing all around the world to find one. Scientists have high hopes for remdesivir, which was originally developed as a potential treatment for Ebola, but was found to be ineffective.
Follow the money.
Hydroxycholorquine costs about $20 for one months supply. It is a generic drug manufactured by several companies. It has been approved and in use since 1955 for malaria and other diseases. It is unlikely that drug companies will pay for clinical trials to test the efficacy of hydroxycholorquine in view of limited profit potential.
Remdesivir is a proprietary experimental drug developed by one major medical company, Gilead Science. It has not been approved for use at all, but is being clinically tested, apparently sponsored by Gilead Science. Estimated cost for one months supply is $1,000. There is a high profit potential if this drug is ultimately approved.
Is it any wonder that the drug industry is trying to slow the use of Hydroxycholoroquine to maintain a market for
remdesivir after it finishes clinical trials?
The FDA has long had a symbiotic relationship with the drug industry, which some might view as incestuous, or worse. It is possible that the FDA is complicit in delaying use of hydroxychloroquine to allow a window of opportunity for the profit from Remdesivir.
There are several companies that make hydroxychloroquine. It is off patent and readily available.
Thanks.
I read somewhere that the first tests were a complete failure for Remdesivir
RE: Remdesivir Estimated cost for one months supply is $1,000.
I keep reading this price being quoted but for the life of me I cannot find a reliable source for this $1,000 figure.
Maybe you can show us where you got this figure. Thanks.
“More like another idiotic post from you.”
Red and yellow?
“Today Dr. Fauci excitedly endorsed Remdesivir for treating coronavirus!!”
Where?
The term for this is “regulatory capture” where a company has “captured” the regulator and the regulator does everything to benefit that company.
Follow the money with $ob’s like Fauxi!
The stock did soar in recent days, but it went down today. Unless he sold his stock in the company, Fauci is out of luck, because the company plans to give the drug away for free at least until Midsummer.
It seems to have some good effect on very advanced cases. HCQ seems to have its effects early on in the virus, like Tamiflu. That helps account for its poor results in hospital usage. Perhaps both in tandem will be useful in treating this virus.
The Fauxchi should have to reveal all pharmaceutical companies that he, or the NIAID Foundation (and the CDCs foundation, for that matter) own stock in.
It’s an expensive drug that the elite can afford but the riff raff can’t, so they die.
Published data indicates an initial does of 200 mg via IV then 100 mg via IV for 5-10 days. Here is a link to one supplier’s price sheet: /phttps://www.medkoo.comroducts/12094
Here is the corrected link: https://www.medkoo.com/products/12094
You might also want to read this article: https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/coronavirus-remdesivir-gilead-antiviral-drug-covid-19/573261/
Cost information is toward the end of the article.
Thanks for the links. Most helpful information!
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.