Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time for Some Good COVID-19 News
Powerline Blog ^ | 04/17/2020 | John Hinderaker

Posted on 04/17/2020 7:37:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Good COVID-19 News

First, it seems that the Wuhan virus has peaked in the U.S. This chart is from the CDC web site. It shows cases of COVID-19 by date of onset. I have posted it a couple of times before, with the caveat that this chart only included around one-quarter of the total number of confirmed cases. Now, however, it includes more than half of cases recorded by the CDC. I assume that no date of onset is available for the others. At this point, it seems clear that the epidemic has assumed the bell-shaped curve predicted by Farr’s Law in the 19th Century:

It should be noted that deaths haven’t necessarily peaked, as deaths follow onset by several weeks, on average–which is one of the reasons why relatively low fatality totals so far cannot be attributed to governments’ shutdown orders.

Second, there is growing evidence that many more Americans have had COVID-19 than has generally been thought. Reuters reports that of the sailors on board the COVID-stricken aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, 60% of those who tested positive for the virus were asymptomatic. This is a higher percentage than was previously estimated by Dr. Fauci, 25%-50%. The Reuters reporter doesn’t seem to understand that this is good news, for two reasons.

First, it means that the fatality rate for COVID-19 is lower than most have believed. I think the balance of evidence so far is that the Wuhan virus is somewhat more lethal than the usual seasonal flu, but of the same order of magnitude. It is possible, however, that it may prove to be no worse, statistically, than the average flu.

Second, it means that the U.S. is closer to achieving herd immunity than previously believed. This ABC News story is to the same effect:

The first large-scale community test of 3,300 people in Santa Clara County found that 2.5 to 4.2% of those tested were positive for antibodies — a number suggesting a far higher past infection rate than the official count.

That’s the good news. The bad news is that we are still a long way from the levels that confer herd immunity.

Next, IHME updated its model today. The new projection is more optimistic, with 60,308 U.S. COVID deaths. That is a positive, although I don’t think the IHME model is any more reliable than any of the others. More good news for those who (like me) live in Minnesota: IHME has lowered its fatality projection for our state from 656 to 195. How’s that for progress? Given that the prior projection was all of four days old, this kind of radical revision obviously does not create confidence in the model. But the new prediction is undoubtedly more accurate than the old one.

Other states I have been following fare well, too. A week ago, IHME projected South Dakota to have 356 coronavirus deaths. Four days ago, IHME reduced that prediction to 181. Today, it dropped to 94. So IHME is slowly coming closer to reality. I believe that South Dakota currently has seven Wuhan flu deaths.

Weirdly, IHME thinks things have gotten worse in North Dakota. A week ago, their model showed N.D. with 369 deaths, a ridiculous number. Three days later, the projection dropped by 91%, to 32. Now–just four days after that model revision–IHME has moved North Dakota back up to 149 deaths. None of this bouncing around has much to do with reality; as of yesterday, IHME showed North Dakota with just 9 deaths. The more closely one looks at the IHME model over time, the less likely one is to give it much credence.

As part of today’s update, IHME has, for the first time, released a state-by-state analysis of when shutdown restrictions might be eased. I have not had time to study it in detail, and have no confidence in it. I may comment on it at a future date.

Finally, this is a good time to update the simple bar chart I have published several times before. It shows, from left to right: the average annual number of fatalities caused, worldwide, by seasonal flu viruses, per the World Health Organization; the global number of COVID-19 deaths, to date; the number of deaths caused by the seasonal flu virus in the U.S. just two years ago, 2017-18, according to the Centers for Disease Control, and the number of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. so far, per the same organization:

Currently, global COVID deaths are just under 30% of the average for a seasonal flu bug, per the WHO. Those numbers are likely wrong, because China and Iran have almost certainly underreported their fatalities. If we assume that China’s true fatality number is ten times what it tells the WHO, and Iran’s is three times, then total global fatalities from COVID-19 would be 41% of an average flu season, so far.

For the U.S., according to CDC, the COVID-19 deaths to date equal 53% of the deaths from seasonal flu two yeas ago.

COVID-19 is a disease, and there nothing good to be said about diseases. But today’s news is generally positive.



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: covid19; infectionrate; mortality

1 posted on 04/17/2020 7:37:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Let’s do some pandemic math. Suppose everyone in the US gets the coronavirus, 330 million. The number of people in Santa Clara County who had antibodies for the virus has now been estimated to be 50 times to 85 times the number who tested positive(reported today). So let’s divide by 66 to keep thing even. That means that 5 million will eventually test positive. About 10% of these will need hospitalization, so divide by 10. That becomes 500,000 hospitalizations. Preliminary results from the University of Chicago shows that 92% of patients treated with the new drug Remdesivir were cured (reported yesterday). Most of those enrolled in the trial were in an advanced stage in the hospital. So take 500,000 hospitalizations and divide by 2 to take the worst half = 250,000 needing Remdesivir. If only 1 in 12.5 treated with Remdesivir die, that becomes 20,000 deaths once this drug is approved for treatment. Compare that to the flu that kills 60,000 to 80,000 people per year. Bye-bye fear!


2 posted on 04/17/2020 7:52:37 PM PDT by Qout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

3 posted on 04/17/2020 7:53:24 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qout

RE: The number of people in Santa Clara County who had antibodies for the virus has now been estimated to be 50 times to 85 times the number who tested positive(reported today)

So, ignoring the antibodies estimate for the moment, how many in Santa Clara County have actually tested positive?


4 posted on 04/17/2020 7:56:08 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qout

Too Logical.../s


5 posted on 04/17/2020 7:56:19 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Anyone tired of the Chinese Fire Drill (tm) yet???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They’re padding all the death numbers anyway. Every old folk that dies is basically being classified as a Covid victim. They’re lying to us once again folks as their denying us our constitutional rights.

This is the kind of thing that we should be up in arms about. How can we have any trust in this govt now that we know we have such a criminally active deep-state? After what they’ve done to president Trump how can we possibly think this whole thing isn’t another card dealt off the bottom of the deck to destroy us and our president?

Sure, there’s a virus that acts like a horrible flu and does cause death. But so does the flu in weakened individuals, right? Are they trying to change our voting to mail in only? Is this a power play by China and the democrats to bring about a one world govt system?

I’m not sure, really I’m not. I’m not really into conspiracy theories, but how in the world can I trust anything they’re telling us after all we’ve seen?


6 posted on 04/17/2020 8:33:08 PM PDT by Bullish (Covfefe Happens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Though Minnesota has either the lowest per capita number of COVID-19 positive tests or deaths (can’t remember which one), we’re still seeing daily increases in positive tests, hospitalizations and deaths.

We’re (IMHO) still on the uphill climb of the curve, I think.


7 posted on 04/17/2020 8:38:32 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Qout
About 10% of these will need hospitalization, so divide by 10.

Two weeks ago 11 firefighters on the department that I retired from tested positive. 1 had symptoms that he thought were from seasonal allergies. 10 never developed any symptoms, all now test negative. None needed any type of medical treatment. At least in this case your assumption your assumption is off by a large amount.

I have a friend who is a supervisor for the TSA at SeaTac; the number of employees they had infected and those with and without symptoms were almost identical.

8 posted on 04/17/2020 9:58:50 PM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

I suspect the only reason the firefighters were tested was because of their profession. Like those in Santa Clara, they normally would not have been tested, but developed antibodies regardless. One in 10 of those who get the virus will get some symptoms, mostly mild. In a New York study of pregnant women, 4 of 33 got some symptoms. One in 66 will get sick enough to need to go to the doctor and get tested for CV-19. What I mean is of those who become sick enough to go to the doctor and get tested, only 1 in 10 will need hospitalization.


9 posted on 04/18/2020 5:32:54 AM PDT by Qout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

1870 tested positive in Santa Clara county by normal methods. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/us-map


10 posted on 04/18/2020 5:38:13 AM PDT by Qout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson