Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live tracker: How many coronavirus cases [and testings] have been reported in each U.S. state?
Politico ^ | Updated 03/20/2020 12:40 PM EDT | Beatrice Jin

Posted on 03/20/2020 10:09:34 AM PDT by daniel1212

111,638 tests given; 12,397 positive; 194 deaths... With the help of The COVID Tracking Project — a volunteer-run accounting of every coronavirus test conducted in America — we’re monitoring how many Americans have been tested in all 50 states. We will update our numbers as new results come in.

The data isn’t perfect. Since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hasn’t yet begun publicly releasing the number of people who have been tested, The COVID Tracking Project is pulling data from state health departments, which can vary in the way they report tests and infections...

New York

22,284 tests | +19,084 since last week 4,152positive 12deaths

Washington

17,105 tests | +12,298 since last week 1,187 positive 66 deaths

California

9,711 tests | +8,593 since last week 924 positive 18 deaths

New Jersey

1,026 tests | +799 since last week 742 positive 9 death

Illinois

3,151 tests | +2,733 since last week 426 positive 4 deaths

Florida

2,942 tests | +2,193 since last week 390 positive 8 deaths

Louisiana

805 tests | +732 since last week 347 positive 8 deaths

Michigan

2,449 tests | +2,274 since last week 336 positive 3 death

Massachusetts

3,132 tests | +2,917 since last week 328 positive 0 deaths


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Government; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: chinavirus; chinavirusstats; coronavirus; covid19; hysteria; stateslist; stats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: daniel1212

I like the plotting by county of the NYT.

The state by state graphs in the OP are very good though. A good addition to my “dashboard”.


21 posted on 03/20/2020 10:27:52 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt

How many deaths from ordinary flu? This is insane. We are burning down our economy over something that will ultimately have less impact than the annual flu. Criminal.


22 posted on 03/20/2020 10:27:53 AM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoCalCynic

The flu is still out and about.


23 posted on 03/20/2020 10:28:32 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
Fingers crossed it isn’t just because states are late reporting it this afternoon.

Unless the rate of infections is much above the rate of testing then increased case numbers do not mean more are getting it. The more police use radar then the more speeding cars are known, but that does not mean there are more speeding cars.

24 posted on 03/20/2020 10:29:47 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Of the three deaths in Michigan two had underlying health issus.

As was the case in almost all those in Italy, yet that is how the flu and HIV work as well.

25 posted on 03/20/2020 10:31:09 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/coronavirus-map-tracking-spread-us-world/story?id=69415591&cid=clicksource_69335433_5_three_posts_card_hed

Leads to a set of links to each State’s web report.

Some States provide a great set of data and others not so much.

Some have a county map of the state. See Colorado as a good example.


26 posted on 03/20/2020 10:32:37 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Take a look at this tracker. Go to the far right hand column and look at the number of total cases per million population. Raw numbers mean nothing by themselves. What matters are the ratios.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries


27 posted on 03/20/2020 10:34:05 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

https://covid19.colorado.gov/data


28 posted on 03/20/2020 10:37:48 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Live tracker?

Their numbers are from yesterday, so they are WAY behind.


29 posted on 03/20/2020 10:37:52 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez
>>> Hopefully someday we’ll get to the bottom of this ‘scare’, and find that someone was tweaking the MSN buttons, trying to throw an election, like the Russians intervening were actually the news anchors on major news networks who despised the Trump economy. Hasten the day.

Ahhh - so someone punked Trump into agreeing with Cuomo and Newsome on the measures they have taken (commending them today even in the conference) - and punked him enough to go along with everything the CDC has said and all the experts have said.

Wow. And here I was thinking he was so smart - but whoever got to him to all of this and make him look stupid and destroy his own presidency is GENIUS level smart. What a master plan. If only he had some advisors as smart as all the FReepers on this site to have steered him clear of destroying the US economy - and his own presidency. I kinda regret voting for him now - considering he has been so easily duped and manipulated by evil geniuses within his inner circle like Pence.

30 posted on 03/20/2020 10:39:13 AM PDT by NELSON111 (Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog s<how. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DennisR; CodeToad
: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/03/16/816707182/map-tracking-the-spread-of-the-coronavirus-in-the-u-s From CDC (shows cases on a daily basis among other things): https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fcases-in-us.html

But as with others I have seen, they is deficient in that it they do not show how many tests were run in each state or the increase.

Unless the rate of infections is much above the rate of testing then increased case numbers do not mean more are getting it. The more police use radar then the more speeding cars are known, but that does not mean there are more speeding cars.

What is needed is a table that shows the number of cases in correspondence with the number of testing, and deaths as a percentage of cases in categories, with one excluding cruise ships and one nursing home outliers.

31 posted on 03/20/2020 10:40:21 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SoCalCynic
I am still struck by the number of negative tests. 11% of tests positive in the country (89% negative) 7% positive in Washington (93% negative)

Yet we are told an est. 80% of the infected do not know they are.

32 posted on 03/20/2020 10:42:16 AM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Has anyone seen a national map that breaks the infection stats down by county?


33 posted on 03/20/2020 10:51:54 AM PDT by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

The WA DOH has some of that information:

https://www.doh.wa.gov/Emergencies/NovelCoronavirusOutbreak2020

Only 7% of those tested have Covid-19.

Other states probably do also.

At this point, the Case Fatality Ratio (CFR) is not valid, because the ultimate outcome (recovery or death) is not known. Even the CFR does not tell the whole story, because it is believed that 80% of cases are mild (assumed to mean no doctor or hospital visit). So if the CFR is 4%, then you have to divide that by 5 in order to get the whole (estimated) picture.


34 posted on 03/20/2020 10:53:56 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around. God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace

Not true. The WA DOH shows the following:

https://www.doh.wa.gov/Emergencies/NovelCoronavirusOutbreak2020

Over 20,000 tested - probably not all celebrities.


35 posted on 03/20/2020 10:57:07 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around. God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SoCalCynic

Percentages can be deceptive, because they do not tell the whole picture. Seven percent of 100 is 7; of 1000 is 70. Those are actual people, not just numbers. So in WA, 7% of about 20,700 tested is 1,376. So 93% - 19,336 people - tested negative. I assume these people had some symptoms???


36 posted on 03/20/2020 11:01:26 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around. God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

Testing is usually done in those with symptoms consistent with COVID-19. As testing has become more available, known contacts may also be tested. Still, the WA percentage numbers have remained stable or declined.

Here in CA, it is very hard to get testing even on symptomatic outpatients - basketball players excluded.

I don’t know that this means the prevalence is lower than feared but it does suggest the vast majority of individuals with respiratory symptoms have something else (such as influenza, etc)

I find this interesting given the current climate which at times seems to be bordering on hysteria.


37 posted on 03/20/2020 11:14:13 AM PDT by SoCalCynic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

i’m kind of hoping that at some point, we find out a lot of people had it and never knew.

THe current test results don’t tell us one way or another.

States seem to be testing people with possible symptoms, and people who interact with people who tested positive.

In Virginia, our ‘positive’ hit rate is 4.9%. That means that for every 100 people who have symptoms, or interacted with someone who was known positive, 5 of them have it. If that was a real number, it would be encouraging, because it would suggest that the chance of picking up the virus by randomly running into someone with it is low.

I’d love to see separate numbers for “people who have symptoms”, and “everybody we test who ran into someone who tested positive”. The second number would hint at casual spread. If that number stays at 5% for a couple of weeks, I would think we could lift most of the isolation, since it would tell us that running into other people with the virus only has a 5% chance of infecting us, not the 20% they seem to be expecting.

Although another number useful would be, for each person, how many of the tests of those they ran into are positive. If THAT number was more than 2, that would signal a robust spread.


38 posted on 03/20/2020 11:42:44 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

The bottom line is people in hospitals.


39 posted on 03/20/2020 11:43:36 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

3 states that let ANYONE into their states!!!


40 posted on 03/20/2020 12:38:01 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson