House Scheme Unfolds – Adam Schiff Transmits “New Evidence” to Nadler…

CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE ^ | 1/14/2020 | SUNDANCE

[frank ballenger]

If true, this is why the Senate should dismiss this case with prejudice. No witness circus, no long, dragged out trial.

Let's try not to worry. All we have to do now is trust McConnell, Romney,Collins, Rand Paul, Justice Roberts and the GOP Senate majority.

Uh oh.

[richardtavor]

With all due respect, no one is listening anymore...just the media and Democrats..

[Ronniesque]

Correct.

[lastchance]

They will have Trump out. I truly fear they plan to have him killed if this does not work.

[LongWayHome]

Lol, with friends like these...Trump is in good hands/s

[Tallguy]

I ‘get’ the plan to spoil the chain-of-evidence by claiming a Russian hack of the Burisma servers. But what about the money trail that Rudy G. was on about late last year. If the money trail connects to the evidence provide by Burisma than the doubt kind of vanishes doesn’t it?

[DarthVader]

They even try they will all get rubbed out and fast.

[abbastanza]

McConnell should cause a vote to dismiss the Articles and then let the voters rain hell on the GOP Senators who vote against it. Thanks for Mitt Utah.

[frank ballenger]

I saw this movie before Schit will run into the senate waving “new evidence” 10 minutes before the end of the trail.

Schiff role formerly played by Jimmy Stewart. (Why is he not convincing) Maybe Victor Buono roles for Jerry Nadler to play. Overweight villain with no concern for victims.

And Sen. Diane Feinstein actually did that against Kavanaugh after testimony and rebuttal times had expired and she illegally withheld pertinent knowledge of the existence of a witness. Sudden witness without time to prepare rebuttal or send investigators to gather facts. Feinstein should have at least been censured.

[olesigh]

K Hepburn as Pelousy

[TigersEye]

Schiffty left the best evidence out of the previous articles of impeachment!? LOLOLOLOL Okey dokey

[frank ballenger]

K Hepburn as Pelousy

Did you see my humorous reference to the photoshopped image of Schumer and Pelosi yesterday?

FR thread:

McConnell crows on Senate floor that Pelosi's impeachment 'gambit' produced 'absolutely nothing' FoxNews ^ | January 13, 2020 | Andrew O'Reilly Posted on 1/13/2020, 5:37:24 PM by kiryandil

To: kiryandil altered images of Schumer and Pelosi loving Iran /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// I think Schumer looks like the mechanical carnival booth fortune tellers (in Tom Hanks movie Big, maybe (can’t remember what it looked like) or insurance ad. Pelosi looks a little like Katherine Hepburn for some reason. Thank her team of cosmetic surgeons and Botox technicians. Maybe it’s just me. Impeachment has been driving me crazy so my judgment may be off. 38 posted on 1/13/2020, 7:54:54 PM by frank ballenger Abuse]

[olesigh]

No didn’t;t see it

I’m watching the faux debate as Kobachar and warren show why they have already made up their minds on Trump removal. Not a surprise, just unethical.

[livius]

This is not rational or reality based in any way.

[tsomer]

Something else here that hasn’t been addressed:

How did Joe Biden become the presumed dem Nominee? There were a dozen or so people — now a few less— running for that spot.

Here are some questions that ought to be asked:

1. Is Biden already the dem nominee? If not, why the claim that Trump’s intentions were to undermine B’s candidacy? Shouldn’t he be vetted as the rest are. This whole thing implies that fix is in, long before the floor vote.

Have these inquisitors conspired to force Biden on the rest of the party, months before the primaries?
A backroom deal? Sounds like corruption to me. Let’s talk about that.

2. If not, why aren’t they presenting evidence of similar actions against any of the other candidates? Trump’s not the sort to put his eggs in one basket.

So,if his alleged net of intrigue stopped with Biden, then isn’t it more likely the request was a legitimate inquiry into the corruption of a former Vice-president.

3. Does declaring oneself a Dem nominee automatically shield one from liability for past crimes?

[Roccus]

Does declaring oneself a Dem nominee automatically shield one from liability for past crimes?

Worked for the Beast (pick a crime, any crime)...Zer0 (identity theft)...Kerry (stolen valor)

[capydick]

Feinstein should have at least been censured.

Remember, an outraged Lindsey Graham promised there would be investigations on her (and others) actions, he's right on top of that!!

[Bshaw]

Adam Schiff need not worry about anything but his testimony as a material witness.

[laplata]

“Yeah but our party, will allow it …”

BS

The Republican Senators know they’d have to build deep bunkers if they go against the president on this.

[laplata]

That’s for sure. Any Republican going against the president knows he/she had better build a deep bunker and stay down there. That’s who they’re afraid of.