Second Amendment ‘sanctuaries’ will never hold up in court

WAPO ^ | Jan. 8, 2020 | Mary B. McCord

[Bob434]

[[It’s in the constitution - there’s no limits!]]

Oh you denier! It’s right there in black and white i n the constitution- right after ... well, it’s somewhere- WAPO Assures you- clear constitutional limits on gun rights... right after the ...

[gundog]

Well.... “ legal” is all in the enforcement, isn’t it?

[BookmanTheJanitor]

Well...doesn’t she look like a ball of fun...

[Bob434]

they will argue that only second amendment sanctuary cities are illegal because of guns- and claim you can’t connect the two because supposedly the constitution ‘protects illegals’ in their minds-

The left are scum- they read into the constitution whatever they want

[semaj]

“You can tell when someone is lying about the Bill of Rights when they start talking about how it “affords” Americans “rights”.”

.... And this author has the temerity to lecture us and tell us we don’t understand the law.

[Lurkinanloomin]

The Constitution restricts the government from infringing on our NATURAL right.

[windsorknot]

Has the WaPOSt addressed the legality of sanctuary cities that refuse to enforce federal laws?

[Slingwing]

“they’ve spurred extremists who want to stand up local militias to engage in armed rebellion against the state — action that isn’t just dangerous but that also runs counter to the Constitution.”

And the jest of the reason for the 2A as outlined in the Declaration of Independence.

[mrmeyer]

They’ll hold up in the streets then. There’s no green zone big enough to protect these bastards from the law of unintended consequences.

[Pox]

Oh, but Sanctuary Cities and such for Illegal Aliens is perfectly fine.

Whatever.

Enough fiddling around. Let’s just have it out, once and for all. Constitutionalists vs gun grabbing tyrants and their true believers.

To the death.

[hanamizu]

“Overblown alarm over reasonable gun-control laws”

---

Two out of the first four words in her article/column are propaganda.

[Big Red Badger]

I Don’t think
3 Percenters,
Militia or
CITIZENS
Give a Crap
About
“Unconstitutional Laws.”

[dp0622]

How they write these things with a straight face is why they are so dangerous if given any power.

So they can never be given power again.

Whatever the cost.

[laconic]

Sorry but she is as fugly in person as the meaning of her words

[wastedyears]

Is the person a commie?

[Carriage Hill]

The one in the pic’s left side, does...

[Pajamajan]

"A free people ought not only be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.” – George Washington

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms…What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them.” – George Mason, Virginia Convention to Ratify the U.S. Constitution, 1788

[Da Coyote]

Guess the libs have not figured out that when most of us decide to tell them to shove their silly laws up their well-used Obamaholes, well - we’ll enjoy seeing their very distorted Obamaholes.

Bring it, buttwipes.

[TADSLOS]

Keeping a citizens armory in Concord didn’t hold up in a British Court of Law either, and the Brits sent in their shock troops to confiscate them.

The rest is history, something the WaPo Commie fools ignore on purpose.

[TheConservativeTejano]

Burn the WaPo to the ground.

Partner, the WaPost has Journalists that can not write one thing that is worth the paper it is written on. I have also given up on the NY Slimes. BTW, we all agree with the above line.

Every Freeper should know that these Journalists in the NY Slimes and the WaPost just spew out cesspool garbage all the time. Main reason why their readership is going down the tube.