William Barr Tosses Out Some Real, Live Bombs in MSNBC Interview

DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

[Pelham]

Particularly if the evidence that Durham is uncovering points to Obama. And there’s good reason to suspect that it does.

[Major Matt Mason]

Waiting 3 years is not someone demanding instant gratification. They "have it all", right (according to Q, at least)? If that is true, then what are they waiting for? They can still begin taking down the perps while working towards defeating the DS, but this operation was obviously dreamed up by some dimwitted government hack that has to have everything perfectly in place to make any move at all. And the country will continue to come apart at the seams while we sit on our hands doing nothing.

[DoodleDawg]

So is going to do anything about it other than appear on MSNBC?

[CodeToad]

When those words are written in indictments I might be excited. Until then, it’s all words and no action from the Trump administration on issues of democrat crimes.

[kiryandil]

This has ALWAYS been about the political timing for 2020.

I'm pretty good at this stuff, but even I don't have a clue for the timing of the massive counter-battery artillery fire against the Deep State/Democrats/Uniparty.

We simply don't have enough inside information, unlike the Inside The Beltway people.

[John W]

As Pelham says in 41 above, Obama is the kingpin. You really have to have all your ducks in a serious row to indict a former president.

[bigbob]

You might save some of that cynicism for the people who are NOT working on our side.

[USS Alaska]

It’s been 3 years.

C'mon man. Barr has only been AG since Feb/Mar of this year. Three years is BULLSHIT, and you usually are not this stupid, unless you are trying to make a false point.

Go back to your mountain and stop with the total cynicism, {or not}.

You are normally not an asshole, but today, with the three year claim, you do the math, and declare whether or not you qualify.

[BushCountry]

Rush sounded like a conspiracy nut job to be honest. That Obama and the Top of the FBI / DOJ officials worked for some secret network of string pullers. Where the President of the United States is a mere puppet of an evil cabal.

While there might be some truth to this (Soros), it is fringe conspiracy thinking. This makes him easy to classify as a nut-job. He needs to be more careful with his words.

[usconservative]

Barr pushing the Durham “report” into next summer makes this a political issue for 2020 and not a criminal one. As expected he is covering for the GOP establishment who do not want to have to defend prosecutions of criminal Democrat coupists by the Trump admin.

That's my take on it also. Wake me up when James Comey is cuffed, arrested and indicted. Until then, nothing to see here.

[Souled_Out]

---

"I think anyone who doesn’t think Barr is going after these bastards is not thinking right."

---

I will gladly eat a double order of that crow, when proven wrong.

[Yo-Yo]

He said Durham report late spring early summer ugh.

This used to be for the Horowitz Report. Now I'll use it for the Durham report:

[PGalt]

You might save some of that cynicism for the people who are NOT working on our side.

OK. Noted. Thanks.

[laplata]

Good for you for being honest. Many will simply be quiet and won’t admit they were wrong.

[SPRINK]

I’ve noticed the elected never-Trumpers seem to have quieted down. I think Barr and Durham are the reason.
____________________________________

yesterday was a bombshell....people that didn’t believe that Comey and his people targeted Trump finally believe that he did....it may have not felt like it but yesterday was huge. People can’t say the FBI was innocent. Next, Barr will prove the CIA was instigating all of this.

[outpostinmass2]

There’s a lot of truth to that...

https://www.rt.com/usa/362836-emails-citigroup-obama-cabinet/

WikiLeaks emails shows Citigroup’s major role in shaping Obama administration’s cabinet

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

MSNBC Hack: W, w, well as a policy matter, why not open an investigation on a thin pretext? [Seriously???] I guess on the one hand you could say that it’s a presidential campaign, it’s very sensitive, you need better evidence. On the other hand, you could say, it’s a presidential campaign, we have to be very careful, it’s a threat to our political process.

When it's applied to Trump, they think even the slightest pretext is good. But when it came to Joe Biden, he made a public statement about strong arming the Ukraine government with a billion dollars, and they want to impeach Trump for bringing it up!

[Bratch]

Full interview: Barr criticizes inspector general report on the Russia investigation

[Uncle Miltie]

Oh noes!

Words!

[PGalt]

You might save some of that cynicism for the people who are NOT working on our side.

OK. Noted. Thanks. Dictkator

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2NXv9RL1i8

(Sorry, I couldn’t resist bigboob...er bob)

No REALLY...apologies.