Thank me.
Posted on 11/13/2019 9:01:13 AM PST by conservative98
Neither of these witnesses ever had a direct conversation with the president about Ukraine, but they're more than happy to testify to what others supposedly thought, what others supposedly said, their policy preferences, the president's "irregular" channel, etc. This might be ok for a Brookings Institute seminar, but is an abuse of process by the House Democrats and Schiff to use this pathetic and monotonous process to try to take out the president. I have never seen anything so preposterous. And this staged idiocy is the best the Democrats can do, even though it occurs AFTER the Democrats have been plotting for two months and have controlled the entire process.
So offended were Kent and Taylor by the president (his policies, decisions, surrogates, etc., etc.) that at NO TIME did either request a direct meeting with him (at least they've never said so). But so concerned about the Bidens' quid pro quo was another State Department bureaucrat that he tried to meet with then-Vice President Biden but was prevented. The latter individual is not and will not be a witness during this sham hearing.
Frankly, Kent and Taylor are blowhards who believe they should set foreign policy, not the elected president. Their LONG opening statements certainly make that clear. They have desperately tried to serve Schiff's narrative, but they failed. Now, Schiff and his slip-and-fall staff lawyer will proceed with leading questions.
Mark Levin
(Excerpt) Read more at facebook.com ...
Thank me.
They put the DIP in Diplomat!
I can’t express what I’m thinking anymore.
John Bolton will be key to all this...and he will favor the President all the way.
Because they didn’t like the boss’ policy they plotted to oust him.
Why put Mark Levin in bloggers? He aint no blogger.
Executive Branch underlings “feeling uncomfortable” or considering certain policy differences from PDJT “folly,” as Amb. Taylor testified this morning, have no place to be given a public stage to degrade the president’s ability to make foreign policy, let alone be made a centerpiece for an impeachment hearing!
Harry Hopkins: President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Deputy President
(used for all sorts of private diplomacy by the Democrat Fascist Party god FDR)
Just what I said Taylor is saying what he thinks someone else was thinking when that person said something...
“somebody thought something”
How can that hold up in a legal proceedings ???
It’s hearsay on steroids...
“Objection”
“Overruled, the witness is merely stating what he thinks the person was thinking. Ill allow it.”
Man alive....I have never heard so many leading questions in my entire life - with all my experience watching TV. LOL This attorney would have been thrown out of any courtroom or at most certainly taken to task for that kind of questioning. Every question has an added qualifier making sure that the bias got into the question. What a mess! This Taylor is something else.
With both opening statements, who the heck cared that they had already covered some of their points in the CLOSED hearing. Why bring it up? Were they reminding the committee what they’d already said? What a waste of time!
Well, the whole thing is a waste of time and I’m not getting anything done..just started to eat breakfast..
The morons’ strategy is to keep this subject in the news (CNN?) as long as possible. When this blows up in their faces they will introduce the next chapter in the hope they can keep the President preoccupied for another year going into the election.
Mark Levin is dead on the mark.
This is nothing more than a clown show and a bad one at that.
There is certainly a sufficient supply of saboteurs and fake issues to last through a dozen presidential terms. I think the supply of saboteurs is replenished as quickly as it is consumed.
Plenty of red meat, just the same, for the MSM to brutalize out president endlessly.
“Executive Branch underlings “feeling uncomfortable” or considering certain policy differences from PDJT “folly,” as Amb. Taylor testified this morning, have no place to be given a public stage to degrade the president’s ability to make foreign policy, let alone be made a centerpiece for an impeachment hearing!”
THANK YOU!!
Headline: Pot calling kettle black funny! We love you, Mark!
Yep. All true. I’m watching and trying not to hurl.
My experience with the State Dept is this: They are all hard-core anti-Americans, they view their role as the “honest broker,” placing themselves between the evil United States and protecting a poor abused country, supporting the foreign country over the United States.
The Dims started using these tactics against Palin in Alaska.
They have had time to refine this kind of harrassment to a higher level of government
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.