Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese reaction to Donald Trump tariff wars…
Metallicman ^ | 8-28-2019 | editorial staff

Posted on 08/28/2019 1:34:18 AM PDT by vannrox

Not, that I want to get too political, but this video that is playing all across China pretty much says it all. It’s all about the Trump Trade War. And it shows how the Chinese feel about it.

This post is about a movie that is playing all over China this Summer. It is allegorical. While it is a story about a British Boxing champion, and his involvement within China, there are very CLEAR parallels about what is going on in the Trump Tariff situation. China has this alligorical movie about the Trump USA trade war with China that has been playing all over CHina during the Summer of 2019. China has this allegorical movie about the Trump USA trade war with China that has been playing all over China during the Summer of 2019. It’s well worth the watch, and it says quite a bit if you only just listen.

Viewing it garners mixed feelings from the precious few Americans who have watched it. There are two types of reactions;

[1] On one hand, Yeah! They don’t like the tariffs and trade situation. Great! Well, tough cookies! Suffer! See what we care. We can wait this out. You must play by our rules. If you don’t like it, well then too bad! We can always find other trading partners. [2] On the other hand, well… um… maybe China would be a far better friend than an enemy. Who knows what they are really capable of or have planned.

Rush Limbaugh comments

To understand the situation let’s look at Rush Limbaugh. He’s a major voice in Conservative circles in America, and perhaps one of the few Republicans that haven’t sold out the American people for some song and dance. You know, like Jeff Sessions, Jeb Bush, and John McCain has. He’s still a trooper, slogging through the Washington swamp, and enduring the slings and missiles from the American mainstream media.

Here’s what Rush (El’ Rush-bo) has to say on the “Trump Chinese Tariff issue”…

RUSH: So the president started here with China. He is dead set on winning this trade war with the ChiComs.

Now, the thing about this that I think will go over a lot of people’s heads unless there’s somebody like me explaining this, is he takes what to most people is a complex issue: The China trade deals.

I mean, it is a miasma to a lot of people.

It’s so convoluted and confusing that nobody knows really what the stakes are.

Why is it happening?

What’s it all about?

Trump takes this complex issue that nobody has even paid attention to for decades and does his best to make it understandable and important, and here is how that sounded.

THE PRESIDENT: We’re talking to China. We’re not ready to make a deal. But we’ll see what happens.

But, you know, we’ve been hurt by China for 25, 30 years. Nobody’s done anything about it, and we have no choice but to do what we’re doing.

We called them on manipulation, and they brought their numbers back, and they brought ’em back rapidly.

We have an open dialogue.

We’ll see whether or not we keep our meeting in September. If we do, that’s fine; if we don’t, that’s fine. But it’s time that somebody does what we are doing.

RUSH: When he talks about “the numbers,” he’s talking about their currency manipulation. They tried to deflate their currency on Wednesday, and it worked to the point of rocking our stock market down 900-some-odd points, and then Trump had some harsh words for ’em and they revalued the next night, and the stock market rebounded.

Of course, the panic that ensued on that one day when the market dropped 900 points was typical of the kind of reporting we get in the media today.

Rush is correct. This is exactly what has happened. (More or less.)

Though, the truth is closer to the fact that China has been keeping the USD-to-Yuan rate artificial for the last twenty years or so. Not, as you might have the impression, naturally at 6.3:1 and then suddenly changed. So yes. They stopped propping up the rate, and it fell like a brick and messed up the USA stocks.

However, how it is being reported is a bit of a lie and a manipulation.

As reported; The USD to Yuan rate has been normal for the last twenty years. Suddenly China manipulated it’s currency to hurt the USD.

But that is a partial truth, equating to an outright lie. The last twenty years has been anything but normal. Here’s a better picture…

The True Situation: China has been artificially propping up the USD – Yuan exchange rate to slow down it’s hyper-active business section for the last twenty years. It has done this for selfish reasons, and the USA has benefited with this exchange rate. When the Trump Tariff wars hit a “road bump” the Chinese stopped propping up the exchange rate. They did so purposefully, (I personally believe) in order to aid in their tariff negotiations with President Trump. They did this to achieve negotiation advantage. The trade wars initiated by Donald Trump has had an effect on China, though it is not as severe as the mainstream America makes it out to be. The trade wars initiated by Donald Trump has had an effect on China, though it is not as severe as the mainstream America makes it out to be.

So yeah. The exchange rate was artificial.

And yeah, China affected it, causing a drop in the USA stock exchange.

However, the details on this event and this exchange are not being reported accurately at all. Instead it is being reported in such a way as to make it appear that China is manipulating the currency exchange rate for their benefit. When the exact opposite occurred. They STOPPED manipulating their currency rate.

Want to know more?

No Instant Cure for Overheated Economy Will China Float the Yuan? Why is China devaluing the Yuan in 2019? China Starts Effort to Slow Overheated Economy An Analysis on the Overheated China Economy

Confusion in America.

So even El’ Rush-bo is confused. He’s sitting pretty in the USA. He’s never been to China. Knows nothing about China except what he’s read from “experts”. Most of whom haven’t been to China in years.

Hey! If I am going to talk about golfing (for example). I sure as heck better know the difference between a driver and a putter. What a slice is, and how it differs from a hook. As well as to know what a "slow green" is.

I just can't watch a baseball game, eat a hotdog and chat about golf, when I have never been on a golf course. Played a round. Or owned any clubs.

Rush calls them “Chi-Coms”, Chinese Communists. Which they actually call themselves, but which means something totally different when heard by a Chinese compared to an American.

American Person; "Chinese Communism" means hard-core tyrannical Marxist government. Similar to what is present in North Korea, and Cuba.

Chinese Person; "Chinese Communism" is socialism with Chinese characteristics.

There are no political parties as all of the Chinese people want the same thing; a traditional life that is safe from interference. Free Market Reaganomics implemented by Mr. Deng in the 1980's led to the "great recovery" resulting in what China is today.

I would say that the problem with American media is that no one ever really … I mean… really reports. They just put their own individual “spin” on the day’s events. Their popularity within America is determined whether their audience agrees or disagrees with what they have to say.

Even if it is completely and totally wrong. How the American mainstream media reports the effect of the Trump Tariffs on China as a while. Absolutely not accurate at all. Bloodied, but in no way knocked out of the going. How the American mainstream media reports the effect of the Trump Tariffs on China as a whole. Absolutely not accurate at all. Bloodied, but in no way knocked out of the going.

The goal of the American mainstream media is to manipulate the people. This manipulation serves a purpose. It keeps Americans living in a constant state of fear and anxiety, from which they can be easily manipulated. Much like sheep, cattle, or chickens. They have been doing so for decades. American mainstream media manipulation of reported content to invoke fear and mob-behaviors in the public by controlling the dialog. American mainstream media manipulation of reported content to invoke fear and mob-behaviors in the public by controlling the dialog. The Movie

Now, this here is the Chinese response to the Donald Trump “Trade War” with China. It is a (sort of) friendly warning (China to President Trump) that is playing in all the movie theaters in China this Summer.

Bet you all weren’t aware of that!

I wonder why? Where’s all those “Chinese experts” and “China policy planners”, aren’t they aware of this? What about all those “talking heads” on the mainstream news, and the conservative political commentators?

No where to be found.

That is simply because they are all actors playing a role. Which, of course, is to manipulate. They tell you what YOU WANT TO HEAR, or arouse a fear to manipulate you to take some kind of action.

Nah. They have about as much awareness about China, as you the reader does about the block buster Pop hit 芒种. Which is absolutely zilch.

News reporting in America is dead. It only took about twenty years for the people to start realizing it. Today, it’s all just actors and actresses reading scripted lines. Those rare few that remain genuine to their beliefs, such as Rush Limbaugh, are only as good as their experiences. Without personal first-hand experiences, they are just fellow strangers espousing opinions.

Anyways…

This micro video runs for 1.47 minutes. It’s short but sweet and is a message straight from Beijing to Washington. I do think that it is worth a watch, even if you don’t like China, Chinese people, or Chinese food.

Watch it for the reasons why other Americans have watched it… to either gloat and feel superior, or to sit back and ponder the enormity of the situation.

I think it is well worth the watch, and so here it is…

Please kindly note that this post has multiple embedded videos. It is important to view them. If they fail to load, all you need to do is to reload your browser.

—– Video Start


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; bot; china; chinabot; fiftycentarmy; pimpmyblog; prochinabot; prochinesebot; redchinatroll; rmb; rubbish; rushlimbaugh; tariff; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: arthurus

[I always thought that Mao was a radical break with the past. Then I started reading a lot of Chinese history. Some emperors were nice guys, some were monsters but all controlled their societies minutely beheading mandarins, generals and common people for minute infractions or because they were believed about to commit infractions.]


Richard Pipes once pointed out that the problem with the Soviet Union wasn’t that they were Communists, but that they were Russian. The issue with being Russian wasn’t the bullshit Democratic issue of “election meddling”, but a world-conquering mindset - a thirst to add provinces/oblasts until the world stands united under Russian rule. The same issue applies to the Chinese, whether they were ruled by emperors, Nationalists or Communists.

I used to think of Chinese Communism as a bane to the world. Now I think of it as an excellent obstacle to Chinese ambitions. The Communists have found a way to perpetuate the reigns of the emperors under their own banner. Fortunately for the rest of the world, that style of governance incorporates the very weaknesses that allowed nations from the other side of the world, whose forebears were savages when the Chinese were civilized, to kick the Chinese sovereign’s teeth in. So long as China is ruled by emperors like Xi Jinping, it will never rule the world. And not for lack of trying.


21 posted on 08/28/2019 3:16:46 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I had awn acquaintance recommend that book to me. The Chinese playing the long game is what the book details. A great read. It gives insight to how they are willing to wait until the timing is right. They are in no hurry, for they truthfully have all the time in the world.


22 posted on 08/28/2019 11:34:54 PM PDT by Oil Object Insp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Such a method of rule works all too well. Since America’s founding, we have been the essential embodiment and defender of the democratic and humane ideals of Western civilization. The US and China now seem to be at odds over a set of trade issues, but in truth, we are in a civilizational struggle as momentous as WW II and the Cold War.


23 posted on 08/29/2019 1:18:24 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oil Object Insp
They are in no hurry, for they truthfully have all the time in the world.

That is not quite correct.

Their strategy requires the U.S. to be complacent enough for them to win.

24 posted on 08/29/2019 4:33:42 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

So you’re saying the Chinese are national socialists.


25 posted on 09/01/2019 7:55:07 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Really? Seems like it’s not holding back their ambitions one bit.


26 posted on 09/01/2019 7:56:35 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
So you’re saying the Chinese are national socialists.

The people who run the government are communists. But that label does not by itself define what each individual in the party believes.

I think the majority of the Chinese people are proud of their country and will form a somewhat united front in the face of external opposition, whether they are in the communist party or not. (I say "somewhat" because there is seldom a case where everyone in a large group is in agreement with the leadership on any matter.)

As for calling them national socialists, that seems confusing to me. The Nazi party did not claim to adhere to Marx.

27 posted on 09/01/2019 8:31:11 PM PDT by Rocky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

It’s irrelevant what the national socialist party claimed to adhere to, but what they did in practice. Josef Goebbels openly described the NSDAP as “the German Left … we despise bourgeois nationalism”; and this gives a good insight into the CPC’s strategy, where they openly tout “socialism with Chinese characteristics”, an open declaration of national socialism if there ever was one. Adolf himself in an interview expounded on point number 13 of the party’s 25-point program as “the nationalization of all public companies—in other words socialization, or what is known here as socialism”.

National socialism also migrated to the Islamic sphere of the Middle East and north Africa; the Ba’ath Party particularly openly declares itself both nationalist and socialist, and Nasser did also with his own Nasserism.

(BTW, I was just looking at Sky News’ live feed as I was typing this, and one scene showed Hong Kong’s airport with the word “Chinazi” scrawled on a display.)


28 posted on 09/01/2019 9:10:36 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson