You said, “when the poorest are the most likely to be obese and are the most entertained poor people ever.”
i do not understand why these two factors enter in. Being obese would not cause them any hesitation. Might make them easier to defeat if our side were not also obese. Being entertained would not give them pause either. Can I hear what is your thinking here?
The thinking is that there has never been a civil war when the poorest are the most likely to be the obese and generally have smart phones to entertain themselves.
When has there ever been any sort of sustained civil unrest when at least one faction involved wasn’t really concerned about starving?
Freegards