Skip to comments.
The New 007 - The Arts and Social Engineering: the Importance of Gender Bending and Race
MOTUS A.D. ^
| 7-20-19
| MOTUS
Posted on 07/20/2019 7:12:10 AM PDT by NOBO2012
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Mastador1; All
Yeah, that creature is as scary as Mike Obama.
41
posted on
07/20/2019 8:45:31 AM PDT
by
Cobra64
(Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
To: pepsi_junkie
It’s time to retire the whole Bond thing! Read Fleming’s novels Bond was a WWII vet, he’s in his 90s now at least.
The “entertainment-powers-that-be” need to come up with another SIS superspy. They then can make him as SJW as the want and see how that flies. Hollyweird & Tinsel World need to show some creativity! Here’s their chance!
42
posted on
07/20/2019 8:45:54 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: Reily
The entire Harvey Weistein / #metoo thing has been utterly corrosive to popular entertainment. Hollywood people are horrible people for the most part. They have used the casting couch for a century and that's not about to change. But they feel a need to virtue signal as a means of inoculating themselves from being called out on their behavior. So for the past couple of years Hollywood has been determined to show that they are super supportive of women by giving them the lead in everything with some sort of super wonderful all powerful flawless character that's just soooo perfect.
I seriously object to a bunch of sexist deviants lecturing me on the patriarchy with a bland, boring Mary Sue protagonist but they keep on doing it and I keep on not going.
43
posted on
07/20/2019 8:55:36 AM PDT
by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: NOBO2012
Liberals say cultural appropriation is wrong when some white person makes a breakfast burrito or a young woman wears a Chinese-style dress to the prom, but then they fully support Hamilton as a black man or James Bond as a woman or making up new genders out of random strings of letters. They can’t even be consistent in their hypocrisy.
44
posted on
07/20/2019 9:03:21 AM PDT
by
Kirkwood
(Zombie Hunter)
To: pepsi_junkie
45
posted on
07/20/2019 9:04:27 AM PDT
by
Reily
To: AnotherUnixGeek
Thank you for that non sequitur in regards to Sean Connery. The 007 designation, to the many fans of Ian Fleming and his Bond stories
IS James Bond, that is who the stories have always been about, not some unknown that has had that particular license to kill assigned to after James Bond retires, er, quits, er, is killed, er some other bullshit.
Screwing with the premise in this manner is worse that the joke a minute Roger Moore incarnation of James Bond.......they and all their social engineering idiots are welcome to it.
46
posted on
07/20/2019 9:29:35 AM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Mastador1
... Roger Moore ...
Ahem, that's "The Saintly Roger Moore..."
To: Mastador1
Thank you for that non sequitur in regards to Sean Connery.
It isn't a non sequitur - it's entirely relevant. Fleming sold the rights to his creation to Hollywood. After that, any changes to the characters, story line or the James Bond universe are pretty much up to any scriptwriter hired by the owner of those rights. That was the case when Fleming was alive to express an opinion and it's certainly the case now. And quite frankly, having some other character get the 007 designation for one movie while the Bond character is taking a vacation in the story or whatever is a pretty minor change - they could do far more.
To: Dilbert San Diego
Im confused. Are James Bond and 007 not one and the same?
"007" is just Bond's code name in the stories, assigned to him by British intelligence. Bond has reflected on other "00" agents who're no longer active in the novels. And that's apparently what's going to happen in this next movie. Maybe Bond is on sabbatical or something, and some other agent gets the code name in the meantime. I think it's funny that this has so much meaning to people on both sides of the political divide.
To: NOBO2012
Why not keep the all male ‘007’ franchise and start a new one for the females? It could be called...
...oh, I dunno...
...the ‘Double “D” 7’ franchise? :)
Just think of the new logos! The “007” logo where the 7 is shaped like a gun could have the 0s replaced with...
...but perhaps I go too far...
50
posted on
07/20/2019 11:25:19 AM PDT
by
compuguru
(De Oppresso Liber)
To: compuguru
If memory serves, the franchise tried floating Halle Berry as the female counterpart to James Bond back around twenty years ago when she co-starred in a Bond flick. (Never saw it though.)
Saw her TV Guide promo interview, and quite frankly, she came off as "the lights may be on, but nobody's home" as we used to say in HS.
To: Chickensoup
52
posted on
07/20/2019 12:14:08 PM PDT
by
ro_dreaming
(Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
To: CodeToad
Not all blacks, just those the Left has successfully conditioned. Just like its only the whites that the Left has succesfully conditioned who feel guilty about having white privilage. The esca2oe from this conditioning is to just treat people as people, and only take color into account when it makes sense, just like any other characteristic. Somebody with a light comolextion may need sun block. Somebody who is black may need to be checked for cycle cell problems by thier doctor. Somebody playing Shakesperes Othello should be black. And so forth. Just like somebody in a horse race should be small but a sumo wrestler should be big.
To: the OlLine Rebel
You mean the founding fathers in blackface.
I thought it was a demeaning and embarrasing concept for the actors.
54
posted on
07/20/2019 12:31:02 PM PDT
by
Chickensoup
(Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
And again what has Fleming not caring for Sean Connery got to do with the bastardization of his creation, at least while Connery was playing Bond they stayed fairly close to the stoires, then they went full clown act with Moore(I bet Fleming would have loved Moore’s smarmy idiocy). I don’t give a hoot in hell about who has the rights and how it’s their ‘right’ to screw up the franchise and kill it. Because that’s the bottom line they are killing the franchise with this crap, if you want to spend your money for PC bullshit that’s up to you
55
posted on
07/20/2019 1:33:28 PM PDT
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Mastador1
It is this simple.
They are not doing it to make a better show. They are doing it to push a leftist social agenda.
It is sort of disappointing that many people have been brainwashed (and that is the correct term) to think they should love this garbage.
56
posted on
07/20/2019 1:48:03 PM PDT
by
yarddog
To: AndyTheBear
“Not all blacks”
True. There is that 3% that didn’t support Obama.
57
posted on
07/20/2019 2:14:49 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
( Hating on Trump is hating on me and Americans!)
To: NOBO2012
Ian Fleming, and the real-life sources for the composite character of James Bond, were all white males, as far as I know.
58
posted on
07/20/2019 2:21:03 PM PDT
by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
To: NOBO2012
Quite correct—not “stunning”.
To: NOBO2012
You could add Patrick McGoohan to the picture gallery:
Danger Man / Secret Agent Man / Number Six was the first choice to play James Bond, both before and after Sean Connery.
He was a devout Catholic, and refused to portray a womanizer. He turned down enormous fame and wealth for his scruples. He actually recommended Connery to the studio.
60
posted on
07/20/2019 2:26:27 PM PDT
by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson