To: PJ-Comix
The first thing any competent Google lawyer would do is demand that Delrahim be completely recused from the case.
As their former attorney, he knows privileged information about Google.
2 posted on
07/06/2019 9:53:04 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
To: PapaBear3625
Second step is to see if he gets deferred payments from his Google employment, and if so the gov't should insist he stays out of it.
Sometimes big money corporations don't mind facing a friendly ex-employee. Often (see Goldmund Sachs) helping them find a gov't job. So, friendly or not, he should recuse.
4 posted on
07/06/2019 10:04:24 AM PDT by
slowhandluke
(It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
To: PapaBear3625
He is an attorney and lobbyist — doesn’t say he had ever been retained by and represented Google.
6 posted on
07/06/2019 10:06:11 AM PDT by
FoxInSocks
("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
To: PapaBear3625
The first thing any competent Google lawyer would do is demand that Delrahim be completely recused from the case. As Justice Kagan taught us in the Obamacare case, it is not necessary to recuse oneself, despite any obvious conflicts. She has set a precedent.
7 posted on
07/06/2019 10:10:58 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
("Other People's Money" = The life blood of Liberalism)
To: PapaBear3625
Attorney Client privilege seems to have taken a hit in the Age of Trump. The Democrats seem to not value such protection anymore. But I suppose it depends on whose ox is getting gored.
8 posted on
07/06/2019 10:11:46 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: PapaBear3625
I’m thinking just the opposite.
He has and will see plenty of $$ from google.
Hes in their pocket
12 posted on
07/06/2019 11:33:28 AM PDT by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson