Posted on 06/20/2019 10:59:25 AM PDT by RArtfulogerDodger
Vaccines are not traffic lights: new explosive CA lawsuit By popular request, I am re-sending this important email to my subscribers. At the very top of this email you will now see "Here's the link to share this email... Click here." That is the web version of this email. You can use that link to share with others to get the word out. As I work with an IT team to get my NoMoreFakeNews blog back up and running on a new hosting provider (as a result of WordPress de-platforming me without specific reason and without forewarning), please spread the above link far and wide. And, be sure to check out Lawyer Richard Jaffe's blog; it is a must follow.
Also, if you are reading the web version of this article and would like to subscribe to my email list, then go to NoMoreFakeNews.com and sign up in the upper left corner. You'll get articles in your inbox. Thank you for your support.
Let me boil this down.
ONE: California MD writes exemptions from vaccines for children who are his patients.
TWO: The city attorney for San Francisco issues an illegal subpoena to the MD, demanding to see all the medical records (including genetic information) of these patients. Obviously, the city attorney plans to use this medical information as a way to punish the MD for writing "unnecessary exemptions."
THREE: The MD obtains a lawyer and sues the city attorney of San Francisco.
Attorney Richard Jaffe is representing Kenneth Stoller, MD, who is under the gun from the San Francisco City Attorney, Dennis Herrera. Here are explosive quotes from Mr. Jaffe's press release:
"June 4, 2019: Today, Dr. Kenneth Stoller filed a lawsuit against the San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera for abuse of power and abuse of process due to the City Attorney's illegal attempt to obtain the medical records and genetic information of Dr. Stoller's vaccine exemption patients."
"The City Attorney's subpoena is illegal under state and federal law and represents an attempt to circumvent federal and state constitutional privacy and other protective laws that prevent 'government snooping' regarding protected genetic information. There are currently no protections in place that would prevent the city attorney from sharing patient records with other state agencies or departments or to allow for the triangulation of medical and genetic data."
"'The City Attorney and other state officials are essentially suggesting politicians should practice medicine without a license,' said Dr. Stoller's attorney Richard Jaffe...."
"The law suit links the City Attorney's subpoena for medical records to a politically-motivated action designed to support proposed legislation SB 276, authored by State Senator Richard Pan. SB 276 would remove medical vaccine exemption decision making from physicians and place it in the hands of state or local public health officials. Under this bill, an important medical decision would be made by state or local government employees who have never met or spoken to the patient or family."
"The Stoller lawsuit alleges that City Attorney's attempt to get the medical records of Dr. Stoller's patients is arbitrary, given that recent measles outbreaks did not originate in bulk from unvaccinated school age children. Of the 38 reported measles cases reported in the San Francisco Bay area so far in 2019, 28 were in adults who contracted the disease while traveling abroad. Of the 10 children, it is likely that a significant percentage may have contracted measles symptoms from the vaccine, or got it despite being vaccinated..."
Note: Every time I write an article like this, people ask what they can do to help. For starters, send this piece out all over the world and get people to contact San Francisco city government and demand justice in the lawsuit.
Understand that vaccination is not comparable to traffic lights, which are posted at intersections to prevent crashes. Vaccination is a practice that has many detractors who have presented, over the years, evidence that vaccines can and do cause great harm. During the past several years, governments and media companies have stepped up their efforts (including overt censorship) to stop rational discussion of vaccination, as if the issue is not only settled, but the persons who question vaccines are "dangers to the community."
This is always the strategy of fascists.
Their attitude is: "We want X. We demand X. To get X, the public will have to comply. So let's put out wave after wave of propaganda and silence people who oppose X. Let's say no argument against our position is possible. Let's use our subpoena power and other powers to get our way. Let's say that X is wonderful and helps people. Let's say we're kind and good. Let's say whatever we need to say, and do whatever we need to do, to SHUT OUR OPPONENTS UP."
That last part is the key. If you think censoring free and rational discussion on a vital issue is kind and good, I have condos for sale on the dark side of the moon.
If you think issuing illegal subpoenas to obtain private information of innocent persons is right and good, I have no idea why you've read this far.
Addendum: In the quotes from defense attorney Jaffe above, you saw mention of a bill pending in the California State legislature, SB 276. It would establish politicians/bureaucrats as the arbiters in deciding whether to grant children exemptions from vaccines. The implication? At the whim and fancy of these pols, the private medical records of every such child could be demanded, pored over, exposed, and then "disappeared" into the state bureaucracy of agencies. How do you like THAT?
The science is settled. Vaccines are good. They ought to be mandated by government. This is a question of personal freedom ... the right to be free of disease.
I look forward to seeing your scientific credentials related to vaccine efficacy and safety. Are they as impressive as those who claim that anthropogenic global warming is settled science?
It’s not a right if you’re forced to drink the kool-aid at gunpoint.
This entire vax propaganda is for two purposes -
1. To cover up the sheer number of diseases that are being carried in by illegal immigrants and representing a clear and present threat to our communities.
2. To increase totalitarian government power.
The science is settled - most times vaccines are good but there is a small percentage (aka risk) that the vaccine can cause harm to the patient.
Where there is risk, there needs to be choice.
All medical procedures carry two risks. The risk to get the procedure and the risk of avoiding the procedure. Since the bureaucrat is NOT the one who has to bear the consequences of the risk (either way), then the bureaucrat should NOT be the one making the decision.
California has disallowed medical exemptions in all but a few cases, which I disagree with.
I’ve been vaccinated as a child, but will likely need some vaccines again because I’m immune suppressed, and some of the people around me don’t agree with vaccination (general public). If I catch the measles, it’s far more serious for me than if an otherwise healthy child catches it. God forbid Ebola winds up spreading.. Then I’m screwed.
“The science is settled.“
Science is never settled.
L
“Vaccination is a practice that has many detractors who have presented, over the years, evidence that vaccines can and do cause great harm.”
The main detractor being Andrew Wakefield, the former British physician who published a fraudulent study in the Lancet that sparked anti-vax hysteria with claims that vaccination was responsible for autism.
The ‘study’ has been discredited, Wakefield’s license revoked, and his two co-authors have renounced the study as well.
But one should never underestimate the love of conspiracy nonsense so Wakefield’s fake claims live on.
If its settled it isn’t science its dogma!
Forget it. The crazy anti vaxxers are as delusional as the qult.
You have as much chance of changing these minds as convincing the qult that there are no unicorns.
Vaccines and inoculations have worked as far back as the Middle Ages. But these folks are too ignorant of history to understand. They hate anything that the govt mandates, whether it makes sense or not.
I think that there are many people who believe that some vaccines are beneficial. The real issue is individual liberty. Mandatory vaccine laws without exemptions are indicative of a latent totalitarian spirit. We might well consider the word of William Pitt the Younger: Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
Hmmmmmm, and where is that 'right' clearly stated within the constitution?????
I think for most it’s a question of HOW MANY vax at a time for a baby/small child...and whether ALL of them are necessary before puberty ie HPV?
Some vaccines do a lot of good. Some are totally unnecessary.
I’m not messing with tetanus or rabies, but there are other things, like the flu, that I’ll take my chances, thankyouverymuch.
I thought it was obvious my remarks were bitingly sarcastic.
It’s okay though to bring illegal immigrants with every kind of horrific diseases. Up is down in CA.
I was looking for the customary /s sarcasm tag and did not see one. My mistake.
Sarcasm is no good if you have to tag it.
“I thought it was obvious my remarks were bitingly sarcastic.”
Nope...they sounded EXACTLY like what someone in SF would say. You fooled us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.