Posted on 04/15/2019 1:02:55 PM PDT by Kaslin
RUSH: There is fire at the Notre Dame cathedral in Paris, and it looks huge. The wooden roof appears to be on the way to becoming fully engulfed. There was originally just a small plume of smoke that came out of it from a distant photographer, but now they’ve got news cameras in there, and it is massive, this fire at Notre Dame.
It has preempted coverage of the imminent release of the Mueller report on all of cable news.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Notre Dame Cathedral continues to burn. The main spire there has collapsed. That’s one of the identifying architectural aspects of the cathedral. All the pictures that I have seen — and I haven’t had a chance to gaze for a long time at any of it — I don’t see any firefighting. I don’t see any water being sprayed on this — ah. There’s some. There’s some. But not on the main blaze. I guess they’re trying to save other parts of the roof. Looks like it’s a wood roof that’s just going up like balsa.
“Is Paris burning?”
If "Notre Dame" expects to rebuild they are going to have to use a gender neutral name; Notre Dym? Neuter Dem?
And sharpen up Durandel for the coming fight...
Charles Martel, please pick up the white courtesy phone...
CC
If it weren’t for the second plane, they would probably have called the WTC an accident.
That said, hardly worth getting too deep into on a thread about the disaster of Notre Dame.
Thank you for the courtesy of your detailed reply.
I had not read any collective such details in my histories of the Crusades.
Specific attacks (such as Haifa?) Certainly.
Attacks (however stupid or selfish such as Constantinople, etc.) against should-be allies or others? Certainly.
All through Germany, Austria and particularly the Rhineland. On the way. There’s plenty out there on it. Much of it about the defense of Jews, somewhat successful, by local clergy and Christians. And communities rebuilt. But it wasn’t the objective, so might not get much mention in many histories.
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-crusades
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2617029/jewish/The-Bloody-Crusades.htm
“Although compared to later tragedies the loss of Jewish life was relatively small, with the main devastation occurring in but four Rhineland towns, the First Crusade has generally been regarded by Jews as a disaster of epic proportions. The period of counting the Omer, between Pesach and Shavuos, when the massacres occurred, became fixed in Jewish law as a time for mourning. A prayer commemorating the martyrs, Av HaRachamim, was added to the Sabbath morning services and is recited weekly, except on joyous occasions. Several Kinnos were composed remembering these events and became part of the Tisha B’Av service. There are several reasons why the First Crusade has been given such prominence, while other, seemingly far greater tragedies have not:
The four towns destroyed were major Torah centers of Ashkenazic Jewry. Although Jews resettled and rebuilt these communities, and Ashkenazic Torah centers flourished, the greatness of these cities’ martyred scholars was lost forever – a theme that appears prominently in the Kinnos.
The Crusades set a dangerous precedent — the rise of organized, popular, anti-Jewish uprisings. Although both the Pope and the local authorities were generally opposed to the Crusaders’ excesses in Germany, these leaders’ hostility to Jews caused them to remain apathetic to Jewish suffering, thus they generally did not intervene. After the First Crusade, instances of mob persecution occurred regularly. Therefore, the Crusades can be seen as the source for much of subsequent Christian persecution. In keeping with the traditional Jewish viewpoint, that the beginning of a tragedy is noted, the events of the Crusades are commemorated.”
The Crusader massacres of Jews (and Christians and Muslim civilians) was unjustified.
This also was strategically a sapping of resources.
However you bringing it up indicates that you may see it only from the victim mentality and not looking at what happened prior.
In the first Crusade Jews aided the Muslims against the Christians. Haifa was Jewish controlled and fought off the Christians.
This anti-Jewry also had its roots in the fact that Jews aided Muslims in taking over Jerusalem, Syria, North Africa and Spain. This is because the Jews saw the monotheistic Muslims (and Islam had not yet been clearly defined in the first 150 years of Arab empire) as ideologically closer to them. Note also that the Copts and some Syriacs also did support the Muslims as they were Semitic speakers. But that was in Egypt.
In the first Crusade - During this time, a full thousand years after the fall of the Jewish state, there were Jewish communities all over the country. Fifty of them are known and include Jerusalem, Tiberias, Ramleh, Ashkelon, Caesarea.
Jews fought side-by-side with Muslim soldiers to defend Jerusalem against the Crusaders.
AND, you forget Christians stood up and attempted to protect the neighboring Jews. In the German city of Trier, the local bishop attempted to protect the Jews —> reference Jonathan M. Elukin, Living Together, Living Apart: Rethinking Jewish-Christian Relations in the Middle Ages (Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 2007),
Other German cities had similar experiences, with some towns such as Mainz having the local burghers fight against the incoming crusaders.
Another German town, Cologne, hid all the local Jews among their Christian neighbors during the Jewish holiday of Shavuot, spending the remainder of the holiday with the Christian acquaintances.
Shrug off the victim mentality when looking at history - warts and all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.