Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Over 1,000 Scientists Openly Dissent From Evolution Theory
The New American ^ | 11 March 2019 | Alex Newman

Posted on 03/11/2019 2:51:56 PM PDT by Sopater

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2019 2:51:56 PM PDT by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sopater
It's kind of funny how people used to say to evolution unbelievers, "No, no, there cannot be a consensus of scientists who would ignore real evidence and promulgate fake evidence in huge numbers! It's impossible!"

Then came Global Warming.
2 posted on 03/11/2019 2:56:42 PM PDT by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Bkmrk.


3 posted on 03/11/2019 2:58:15 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

“...Darwinists have never faced those questions,” he explained. “They’ve never asked scientifically, can random mutation and natural selection generate the information content in living things.”


The fact is that a lot of scientists seem to have a difficulty knowing when to just say “We don’t know.” They have put too much faith in materialism to provide answers, and when it cannot, they simply latch on to whatever seems like the least ludicrous possible solution, even if it can’t be scientifically established.


4 posted on 03/11/2019 2:58:22 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

So what? It’s a theory, lots of people agree and disagree with every theory. Nature of the beast.


5 posted on 03/11/2019 3:00:24 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

“Theory” of Evolution? ... It’s only a barely plausible Hypothesis. Within a species there has been some observed adaptation but never has one species been observed to transform into a new species.


6 posted on 03/11/2019 3:01:08 PM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

BookMark


7 posted on 03/11/2019 3:06:26 PM PDT by Verbosus (/* No Comment */)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
So what? It’s a theory...

To many, it's much much more than that.
8 posted on 03/11/2019 3:08:24 PM PDT by Sopater (Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Verbosus

There is a popular misunderstanding about what a scientific theory represents. For scientists a theory is an hypothesis that can be falsified by experimental observation and induction and has not been so falsified. Until the scientists who have expressed their dissent with the process of natural selection have published evidence of some biological complexification that can only be sufficiently explained by supernatural forces then their dissent is merely their biased opinion. Natural selection and complexification is routinely demonstrated in molecular biology labs every day and is not really very controversial anymore. They are entitled to believe whatever they want but they can’t pretend its scientific without a falsifiable hypothesis and peer reviewed data that validates that belief.


9 posted on 03/11/2019 3:24:02 PM PDT by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: captain_dave; bigbob
No, sorry. Disproven hypotheses should no longer be called a theory by anyone.

What we're seeing behind this particular curtain that's being pulled back is how credentialed academics have been able to promulgate falsehoods throughout the system and get their wrong-headed "theories" taught for decades if not centuries in schools of all levels, long after contrary evidence gets purposely subverted by these same academicians.

There are many such fiefdoms that are amazingly and successfully resistant to the assimilation of new, factual information.

What we think we know is in large part wrong and a big reason is that so-called scientists (and others, e.g., archaeologists, art historians, etc.) are able to hold sway to marginalize very credible reports, often by well-trained observers.

A very good book on topics that elucidate such problems is, "Everything You Know is Still Wrong," by Lloyd Pye.

10 posted on 03/11/2019 3:25:27 PM PDT by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

..Only 1000 people disagree with flat-earthers...

therefore, anyone who still believes it’s round is crazy!

...idiot logic


11 posted on 03/11/2019 3:31:15 PM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Faith is the key word. It is a religion to some.


12 posted on 03/11/2019 3:38:02 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
So what? It’s a theory, lots of people agree and disagree with every theory. Nature of the beast.

Do you really think "lots" of people disagree with atomic theory? Get a grip. Darwinian Evolution is a crock. This doesn't mean that Genesis is correct but only that Darwinian Evolution is not.

ML/NJ

13 posted on 03/11/2019 3:38:45 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Nice to read. Thanks.

Evolution is a hoax based on biased “science” just like Global Warming is a hoax based on biased “science”.....

But what destruction these hoaxes have wrought.....


14 posted on 03/11/2019 3:47:02 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Stop. Global warming IS fake. Evolution is a fact. No theory. A fact. (Various permutations Of evolution may be considered theoretical)

You can still keep your faith and understand how the world works. You wouldn’t give up fire or the wheel. Just another science.


15 posted on 03/11/2019 3:47:58 PM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

There is just one problem with the missing link...

It’s missing.


16 posted on 03/11/2019 3:55:25 PM PDT by seawolf101 (Member LES DEPLORABLES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave Wright
I think what you're calling "natural selection" should come under the heading of micro-evolution or persistent phenotypical expression.

No primates, apes, simians, hominoids, or neanderthals have ever been shown to have been an ancestor to homo sapiens sapiens.

Perhaps you have a unique explanation how prokaryotes made the jump to eukaryotes.

17 posted on 03/11/2019 3:56:21 PM PDT by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Since there is no experiment that can disprove, let alone prove, it is not a theory. It was observational opinion. Even a theory requires more


18 posted on 03/11/2019 4:13:36 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dave Wright

There is no way to test one species or organism turning into another


19 posted on 03/11/2019 4:15:18 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

That which is known as being true and fact can be placed on one single sheet of paper. That which is unknown and theory fills infinite volumes in infinite libraries


20 posted on 03/11/2019 4:30:39 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Liberals, Rinos, moslems, illegals, lamestream media. All want America to fail and die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson