There is a popular misunderstanding about what a scientific theory represents. For scientists a theory is an hypothesis that can be falsified by experimental observation and induction and has not been so falsified. Until the scientists who have expressed their dissent with the process of natural selection have published evidence of some biological complexification that can only be sufficiently explained by supernatural forces then their dissent is merely their biased opinion. Natural selection and complexification is routinely demonstrated in molecular biology labs every day and is not really very controversial anymore. They are entitled to believe whatever they want but they can’t pretend its scientific without a falsifiable hypothesis and peer reviewed data that validates that belief.
No primates, apes, simians, hominoids, or neanderthals have ever been shown to have been an ancestor to homo sapiens sapiens.
Perhaps you have a unique explanation how prokaryotes made the jump to eukaryotes.
There is no way to test one species or organism turning into another
Bingo. Well put.
Your post is an excellent summary and defense of science.
A good place to start any discussion of evolution theory.