Posted on 02/01/2019 6:55:11 AM PST by NOBO2012
Someday, although I doubt Ill be alive long enough to see it, history will note all the lies that have been made up, told and perpetrated against Donald J. Trump and his family. By then all of the intended damage will have been inflicted and few will be left to care. And that is why we take great pleasure when somebody, like The Telegraph, is held accountable in the here-and-now for their libelous spreading of flagrant lies. So Ive chosen to print The Telegraphs retraction and apology to Americas First Lady, Melania Trump, in full:
Following last Saturdays (Jan 19) Telegraph magazine cover story The mystery of Melania, we have been asked to make clear that the article contained a number of false statements which we accept should not have been published. Mrs Trumps father was not a fearsome presence and did not control the family. Mrs Trump did not leave her Design and Architecture course at University relating to the completion of an exam, as alleged in the article, but rather because she wanted to pursue a successful career as a professional model. Mrs Trump was not struggling in her modelling career before she met Mr Trump, and she did not advance in her career due to the assistance of Mr Trump.
We accept that Mrs Trump was a successful professional model in her own right before she met her husband and obtained her own modelling work without his assistance. Mrs Trump met Mr Trump in 1998, not in 1996 as stated in the article. The article also wrongly claimed that Mrs Trumps mother, father and sister relocated to New York in 2005 to live in buildings owned by Mr Trump. They did not. The claim that Mrs Trump cried on election night is also false.
We apologise unreservedly to The First Lady and her family for any embarrassment caused by our publication of these allegations. As a mark of our regret we have agreed to pay Mrs Trump substantial damages as well as her legal costs.
Most of the embarrassment caused by The Telegraphs publication of false allegations is their own. Why anyone would print an article based on the work of an acknowledged liar like Nina Burleigh who writes for Newsweek as a National Politics Correspondent specializing in Trump bashing is beyond me. Especially when Burleigh acknowledged that she never actually spoke with the First Lady for the book she based the article on. She claims Melania Trumps people wouldnt grant her an interview a fact that in retrospect is not so surprising.
But Nina isnt going to let truth lay in the way of her journalistic deception and dishonesty. No indeed, shes fighting back: They defamed me by calling my work false, Burleigh complained. I presume she subscribes to the belief that such behavior is only inappropriate when directed at a journalist not a public figure.
In a letter to the Telegraph Ninas lawyer threatened a defamation lawsuit over the apology it issued to Melania Trump:
Your Apology traduces [ed. when youve got nothing else use 2-bit words] Ms Burleighs reputation as a competent journalist by asserting that many of the statements in the Article and by extension in the Book from which the Article was derived, both authored by her, are false.
Im going to predict that Ninas threat will never see the light of a courtroom on either side of the Atlantic. The letter is a lame attempt to salvage what little reputation the journalist - who once infamously offered Bill Clinton BJs for his role in in keeping abortion legal - had left.
Indeed, Ms. Burleighs defense seems to consist mostly of her own flawed work
Burleigh also told the Washington Post her book has been widely excerpted and reported on in American publications. [ed. repeat a lie frequently enough and it will be true]
and the work of others who libeled Melania first:
Furthermore, the points they objected to include facts that have been previously reported by other writers."
Apparently the new rigorous standard for journalist facts is I read it somewhere.
Outside the insular world of partisan journalism circular reasoning is considered a logic fallacy and excluded from serious deliberation. But in the very dense world of modern journalism, where the prime objective is advancing the narrative, a thing is not false if its your truth whether its false or not.
Your Honor, my client pleads not guilty by reason of cultural relativism.
Posted from: MOTUS A.D.
Spot on. I hope Melania uses the money she gets from this settlement to sue Nina Burleigh directly.
We lost the House in 2018 due to belief of the lies that the propaganda press spews forth every hour as well as voter fraud.
I enjoy your posts. I just wish you’d stick around to comment on your own damned threads. It’s like hearing amplified chatter on CB radio, but not having the boost to talk back to them. CB radio? Hmmm. I’m showing my age again.
Why is she still in the employ of anyone, is beyond my comprehension.
He should wear more makeup...
I would suggest that she has a level of competence in the same act that certain White House interns had 20 years ago. The same act which she said every woman in the nation should perform on BJ Clinton for what he did to preserve their sacred right to offer up their babies to Moloch...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.