Posted on 01/11/2019 11:06:47 PM PST by Olog-hai
Feminist activists have only one goal this year: to make sure abortions in all forms stay legal.
As the Supreme Court decides whether or not to hear a case that could end legislation requiring aborted fetuses to be buried as human beings, feminists are panicking. This could be the first abortion-related case to be heard by a conservative-leaning court, and the first abortion case to be heard by Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Creator of the Daily Show and pro-abortion activist Lizz Winstead tweeted on Jan. 11, “Today SCOTUS decides whether it will hear an Indiana case requiring mandatory cremation/ burial for abortions AND miscarriages based on ‘dignity of personhood’ If they take it, & decide medical waste is a person, ROE IS DEAD. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION.”
Winstead callously calls unborn children “medical waste.” […]
… CNN columnist Danielle Campoamor tweeted, “Dear Scotus, Fetal tissue is not a person. Fetal tissue is not a person. Fetal tissue is not a person. Fetal tissue is not a person. Fetal tissue is not a person. But I am. And I matter more than fetal tissue. Signed, people who have miscarriages and abortions.”
People who have miscarriages don’t choose the death of their babies, Danielle. There’s a difference. …
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
I enhanced your post a bit. I also find it interesting that they've rediscovered the word "sex" instead of the more PC term "gender", and used it in the title of this movie. Almost like they had to put that into the title to make the subject of the film, and the topic, more sexy than it is (or ever could be).
I am absolutely sickened ...
Oh, sorry, you are right!
She is medical waste.
They desperately need to believe they aren’t killing a human. They delude themselves myriad ways to cover over their guilt.
All leftest should be sterilized. No choice in the matter. That will end their arguments for abortion.
I have been praying that God would remove them both from the bench while Trump is president.
Then Trump will appoint four Justices in three years.
Then Thomas retires.
Five Justices in one term. What an awesome Presidential legacy
btt
Dear Ms Campoamor:
DO NOT EVER EQUATE MISCARRIAGE WITH ABORTION!!
My cousin had a miscarriage. She mourned the death of her child greatly.
Pro-abortion people are demonspawn.
Prove it.
No problem, makes sense to me.
From the point of view of saving innocent lives, this is irrelevant.
The minute Roe is overruled, all 35 State Legislatures which have not yet passed laws or constitutional amendments guaranteeing the “right to an abortion” will convene in emergency session and legalize abortion.
From the point of view of the Constitution, however, it would be very good if the ruling says the USSC has never had and does not now have the authority to issue a decision like that.
How did so many women go so so wrong in our culture.....
That right there has destroyed western civilization more than any other degradation
And it’s getting worse
Young educated white women now barely want kids if at all
Much like boobs rolling around like kittens fighting bra burning 20 somethings from the 70s this group too will panic at 35 about having a baby
Feminism
An excuse to be stupid and loud
If the decision means that state laws permitting abortion are also unconstitutional, then it would not be altogether in vain.
The Guarantee Clause of Article IV Section 4 insists on “a republican form of government” at state level, and since a socialistic form of government is enmity to that, the states do not have the right per the Constitution to go socialist (permitting abortion is socialistic, and anti-republic).
… [Y]ou Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.This is at the heart of the so-called “feminist” movement. A deliberate attack on the family, and whether Marx was consciously aware of it or not (not that he really cared), on women themselves.
The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.
He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.
For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.
Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other’s wives.
Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private. …
“Fetal tissue is not a person.”
That is why, when talking to a pregnant woman, you ask, “How’s your fetal tissue developing?”
“Oh look, she’s having a fetal tissue!”
And when Lucy got pregnant, Ricky sang, “We’re Having Some Fetal Tissue”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQtjSm9p-hA
When women show off their ultrasounds, should we exclaim, “what a lovely clump of cells”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.