Posted on 01/08/2019 2:11:36 PM PST by RArtfulogerDodger
[PHOTO]
America has been brainwashed by a mass-media gone insane.
Virtually hypnotized by favorite “news anchors,” Americans no longer believe in facts or truth, but are captives of lies, drama, clever backdrops and sets, TV tricks, and those whom they trust.
Americans are in the grasp of network executives who clandestinely inject them with marketing ploys, sales ploys, and a Leftist political agenda designed to increase viewership, a chosen Elite, and money profits.
Americans have been manipulated into trusting so-called, news anchors. These performers are little more than self-aggrandizing, multi-millionaire news readers. Like their film-celebrity and entertainer counterparts, they are actors who somehow steal the confidence and love of viewers.
For instance, Rachel Maddow has a net worth of some $20 MILLION USD.
“One of the most popular faces in TV News reporting, Rachel Anne Maddow is a TV and radio personality. Her popularity has been on the rise since the debut of her eponymous night show in 2008.She is a self made lady and her quirky style makes her different from the crowd. Her ability to hold sway in the minds of millions of viewers everyday lies in her opinionated views. She is the only gay television anchor...”
—SalaryAndNetWorth.Com
It is said that Rachel Maddow is not a reporter in the mold of an Edward R. Murrow, Jack Anderson, or Walter Winchell. She has no real background in news, sources, informants, or information.
Then, What does Rachel have?
Rachel—we are told—has “a popular” face; she is “quirky;” she has a strange “ability to hold sway in the minds of millions of viewers;” and, she is “gay.”
Rachel Maddow, in my opinion, is an apparent, self-aggrandizing, Twenty-millionaire. She gets paid a reported $7 MILLION USD per year to say the things she says; and, the way she says them. Many are held in thrall by this liberal, “gay” woman and a set of liberal network Masters.
The real Power here is between those with the power, and those doing the bidding of power. Networks are at the beck and call of Power—political and civil. And Power needs the networks.
Each has a theme or meme it wants to purvey or push. The American viewer is caught in the middle. S/he is a plaything, a toy, to be programmed and pointed—pointed at the enemies or resources of Power.
Resources can be money or influence. Enemies can be ANYthing in the way.
The American viewer is just a pawn in this global game.
Everyone pushing this unreasoning, liberal agenda has an interest in the outcome. They either stand to acquire wealth or influence. Each of these translates to Power. The stepping stone—s/he with the wealth and ability to grant such influence—is the ordinary American Viewer.
In order to reap a dreamed-of, One-World Success, with themselves as undisputed Rulers, the agendized, organized sowers of dissension must harvest You.
You are the source of their drive, frustration, and little victories. So, pay attention:
“In 1927, Carl Jung wrote: ‘…the dream is the theater where the dreamer is at once scene, actor, prompter, stage manager, author, audience, and critic.’
“But in the case of the news, the dream must come from an external place. It must come from The Anchor.
“There must be His Voice and it must narrate (invent, fabricate) the hallucination.
“In Paddy Chayefsky’s 1976 film, Network, the unhinged news anchor Howard Beale tells his audience: ‘We deal in illusions, man. None of it is true! But you people sit there day after day, night after night, all ages, colors, creeds. We’re all you know. You’re beginning to believe the illusions we’re spinning here. You’re beginning to think that the tube is reality and that your own lives are unreal. You do whatever the tube tells you….You even think like the tube. This is mass madness. You maniacs. In God’s name, you people are the real thing. We are the illusion…’
“The news is a fabricated continuum.”
—Jon Rappoport
America’s love affair with mass communications began around 1926 with NBC Radio. What is now a massive world-wide network started small, as “a web” of telephone lines that crisscrossed northeastern America.
[PHOTO]
This made possible clear, instantaneous, National radio communications and programming. This helped create some of the first global cartels in radio, telephone, and advertising.
Power.
These entities began to recognize their power to create a national mood, conversation, and character. The power of radio, advertising, and the molding of American thought took a giant step forward.
Gone were the the days of scratchy, experimental radio crystal sets. As the network widened, a red carpet got rolled out for national news, views, and entertainment.
As a sole-source, competitive radio networks and hired entertainers soon learned to focus on the “magic” of their exclusivity and dramatic abilities. They used their powers to entrance and influence people.
American news changed from radio to TV. A stone-serious, John Cameron Swayze and radio executives agonized over what real news to deliver.
When Swayze’s masters discovered he could actually sell cigarettes with dancing Old Gold boxes featuring female legs, the power of TV, the molding of American Thought, and fake “news” of today were finally born.
[PHOTO]
We ultimately shifted, to the high drama and uncaring acting of today's so-called, TV, “news anchor.” The “anchor” is all about make-believe, self-aggrandizement, and advertising. The “Rachels” of today and tomorrow.
This was something destined to happen, given a “natural evolution” of mass communications. There’s just too much money involved. Political power, influence, and stardom are the ravenous triplets of mass communications.
The newly-found magic of brain-conditioning and mass-hypnosis fostered explosive growth of radio and TV programming.
This had all been presaged by movies. There is ample evidence deep in the miasma of American movies and studios.
The first studios were run by Jewish men whose families had fled the murdering pogroms and oppression of Europe. They had come to America for what they saw as a better life. They mostly got into film by accident, as distributors and displayers.
When these newly freed Jews moved into actual film production, they helped create an American Vision, of how they saw the world. This was innocent. They believed it.
They created “The American Dream.” How we are thought to have been; and how we think of ourselves today. They inserted their dream into the minds of people all over the world. It was innocently done.
But, Envious forces—unfeeling, intellectual, and tremendously wealthy—they took slow notice.
With the advent of world wars, national politics on a world stage, and other grandiose schemes, the powers of film, radio, and (later) TV were co-opted by these forces, and became global tools of elite power-brokers.
There’s no other way to influence an entire planet.
It has to be done by mass-communications.
That—and a ravenous 24 hour news cycle—in my opinion, gave us our “Rachel,” Chuck, Jim, Don, Jake, and other wildly Leftist “news” pimps.
Don’t get taken in. Don’t get played. Don’t be a victim.
Don’t get “harvested.”
Think for yourself. Read what you research for yourself.
Tell everybody.
[PHOTO]
She's not a news anchor. She's some kind of commentator who has her own show.
Didn't she peak a few years back? I don't recall anybody getting enthusiastic about her show lately.
I would fight Laz to be first in line, though.
I’ll take one for the team, here.
Only the dumb ones are.
” She is the only gay television anchor...”
—
What’s Shep, then, chopped liver? (don’t answer that).
Watching has many subliminal, emotional messages.
Reading is more about facts and logic.
What? Where?
[PHOTO]
Which photo? I didn't see one.
[PHOTO]
Are you trying to drive traffic to your blog to see images you had nothing to do with?
What's with this [photo] business?
Is it your opinion that since you aren't bright enough to figure out HTML then you deserve blog traffic?
[PHOTO]
[PHOTO]
[PITHY INSULT]
Back when I used to do Fakebook, I got a friend request from a guy I knew in college decades ago. I looked at his profile, and he listed “Rachel Maddow” as his favorite TV show. I ignored his request (and eventually closed out of Fakebook).
Anderson (I like it in the pooper) Cooper is not pleased at being ignored.
I disregarded friend requests with likes of liberal news people as a rule.
Dumped FB years ago and I still don’t miss it.
Rachel Madcow. It fits.
What about Anderson Cooper
>>>Didn’t she peak a few years back? I don’t recall anybody getting enthusiastic about her show lately.
MSNBC had a network-best year in 2018. Maddow is the second most watched news show behind Hannity. In December, Maddow had better numbers than Hannity.
Just preaching to the choir.........Madcow has her audience and they won't be swayed.
This country is screwed, the MSM has successfully been taken over by the left wing media and all such news is nothing but left wing propaganda.............
How do you overcome that?
Does NBC’s profits from mostly News or entertainment?
I’m guessing Entertainment.
They sell a lot of products..dvds of TV shows and so on?
Someone coined the phrase “the cult of personality”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.