Posted on 01/01/2019 2:35:30 PM PST by grundle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pzJZlbIGWhU
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
What is the case?
No inclination to watch it. If it helps you get laid... So why do women need them? I prefer smokers.
If someone wants to get tattoos, I am all for it.
But getting tattoos, especially certain kinds, and in certain places, does not immunize a person from criticism.
If an employer doesn’t wish to hire someone with tattoos up their neck and face, it is their right not to.
It is discriminatory to prejudge or deny people based on their body type, appearance, of skin color, things over which they have no control.
It is another thing when someone chooses to alter their appearance via tattoos.
Is it just me or what? I hate tatoo’s!
Excellent video, by the way. All young people should watch it and decide if they want tattoos.
They are ugly. If not when you first get them, they will become ugly later on. They cost money. They hurt. And the goof that writes on your body is not an artist. He’s a guy who gets paid to write on your body.
I am tolerant, Maybe even supportive, of
Military Tattoos and perhaps single small, pretty tattoos on women
Butterfly, rose, tinkerbell, etc
Anything more is just mutilation
“Tattoos are disrespecting the body God gave you.”
So is wearing clothes
A tattoo is nothing more than a permanent reminder of a passing fad, gotten by those who want to express their individuality by doing the same thing as everyone else.
You can take the clothes off whenever you want.
Can you take off the tattoos whenever you want?
When someone has very noticeable tattoos on and above the neck that often means they have decided to stay within a particular kind of character. This is who they now are, all the time, and with everybody. Some consider it a just matter of full expression, while others see head & neck tattoos as a warning.
Tats do NOT AGE WELL!!! You are getting a permanent marking and the removal of the same is a VERY EXPENSIVE AND PAINFUL option later! A couple of DECADES ago, I read about somebody selling a tattoo ink that, while permanent, would erase easily under certain laser light frequencies. Seems like that would be a winner if it is still around.
I am still of the opinion that if it was illegal to tattoo someone who was drunk or drugged, the ‘industry’ would be a lot smaller.
It's like taking a nice looking car and then slapping some cheesy bumper stickers all over it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.