Medical consequences of homosexual sexual behaviors

I never did find out

Clicked in the article
Saw it was a repost of something from 2013
Saw a link to some articles same sex marriage rulings

Scroll past ad

Same lead in again

And then a popup of Burt Reynolds covered my phone browser

Done

Clickbait

We aren’t allowed to talk about this subject are we? As homosexuality is special and in an honored position in the politically correct grievance groups?

"...here we go..."

Not so sure one should click that link. I am sure not taking that chance.

I used to run the Homosexual Agenda ping list, which was started by another freeper.

This info has been out there for decades, I guess what with the success of the homo agenda, the knowledge has been carefully sequestered away, as it ruins the fake sheen of “homos are just like everyone else” lie.

Just confirms that the anus is not a sex organ. It's being called that in the schools, however.

Sleeper posting bot.

Interesting posting history you got there, Rip Spam Winkle.

Are you the sodomy experty, Spam Boy?

Hey, you woke up right during a FReepathon! Click here, click-bait boy! You know you want to!

https://freerepublic.com/donate/

William Bennett, Gays, and the Truth 231
Mr. Virtue dabbles in phony statistics.
By Walter Olson

“This is tough news. It’s not pleasant to hear,” said former Education Secretary William Bennett on ABC’s This Week Nov. 9. “But it’s very important, and it’s part of telling the truth.” The occasion for tough-but-needed truth telling: Bill Clinton’s first-ever presidential speech to an organized gay-rights group, the Human Rights Campaign. Clinton had conferred respectability—wrongly—on the gay quest for approval when in fact, said Bennett, he “should tell the truth on this one”: Homosexuality “takes 30 years off your life.” The average life expectancy for gay men, Bennett declared, was just 43.

Many a mother’s heart around the country must have sunk at that moment amid premonitions that she would outlive her son. A well-known public figure would think twice before delivering tidings that grim, right? And Bennett’s statistic was no slip. Only days later, in the Nov. 24 Weekly Standard, he repeated the assertion phrased for maximum emphasis:

“The best available research suggests that the average life span of male homosexuals is around 43 years of age. Forty-three.” (Italics his.)

ADVERTISING
Yes, it’s a sensational, arresting number, which may soon pass into general circulation. Already, for example, the National Review has repeated it unskeptically in an editorial. Where did the figure come from, and how plausible is it?

Bennett got the number from Paul Cameron, a researcher well known to followers of gay controversies. Cameron, a former assistant professor at the University of Nebraska who has consulted for such gay-rights opponents as former Rep. William Dannemeyer, R-Calif., heads a group called the Family Research Institute. Cameron resigned under fire from the American Psychological Association and was later formally terminated from membership following complaints about his research methods.

He has had run-ins with other professional groups, including the Nebraska Psychological Association and the American Sociological Association. According to Mark Pietrzyk’s exposé in the Oct. 3, 1994, New Republic, the state of Colorado initially hired Cameron as an expert witness to defend its statute restricting gay-rights ordinances, then elected not to use his testimony after it got a closer look. His life-span figures have circulated for years in religious-right circles, but Bennett’s comments appear to represent their first real breakout into wider public discussion.

Cameron’s method had the virtue of simplicity, at least. He and two co-authors read through back numbers of various urban gay community papers, mostly of the giveaway sort that are laden with bar ads and personals. They counted up obituaries and news stories about deaths, noted the ages of the deceased, computed the average, and published the resulting numbers as estimates of gay life expectancy.
What do vital-statistics buffs think of this technique? Nick Eberstadt at the American Enterprise Institute sums up the reactions of several of his fellow demographers: “The method as you describe it is just ridiculous.”

But you don’t have to be a trained statistician to spot the fallacy at its heart, which is, to quote Centers for Disease Control and Prevention statistician John Karon, that “you’re only getting the ages of those who die.” Gay men of the same generation destined to live to old age, even if more numerous, won’t turn up in the sample.

Other critics rattle off further objections. The deaths reported in these papers, mostly AIDS deaths, will tend to represent the community defined by such papers or directly known to their editors. It will include relatively more subjects who live in town and are overtly gay and relatively few who blend into the suburbs and seldom set foot in bars. It will overrepresent those whose passing strikes others as newsworthy and underrepresent those who end their days in retired obscurity in some sunny clime.
Bennett is a busy man, but even he has access to the back of an envelope. A moment’s thought might have suggested a few simple test calculations. Suppose he assumes—wildly pessimistically, given current incidence data—that half the gay male population is destined to catch the AIDS virus and die of it.

The actual average age of AIDS patients at death has been about 40. (Presumably protease inhibitors will extend average longevity, but that will only increase Bennett’s difficulty.) For the number 43 to be the true average death age for the entire population of gay males, HIV-negative gay men would, on average, have to keel into their graves at 46. Looked at another way, if even half the gay male population stays HIV-negative and lives to an average age of 75, an average overall life span of 43 implies that gay males with AIDS die at an implausibly early average age (11, actually).

Against this, Cameron and his supporters argue that, according to their survey of obits, even if they don’t have AIDS, homosexual males tend to die by their mid-40s (and lesbians by their late 40s). Some downright peculiar results followed from this inference. One is that—contrary to the opinion of virtually everyone else in the world—AIDS in fact hasn’t reduced gay males’ life expectancy by that much—a few years, at most. Moreover, the obits also recorded lots of violent and accidental deaths.

From this Cameron and company concluded not that newsworthy deaths tend to get into newspapers, but that gays must experience shockingly high rates of violent death. With a perfectly straight face they report, for example, that lesbians are at least 300 times more likely to die in car crashes than females of similar ages in general.

Unfortunately, there really is no satisfactory measure of actual life expectancy among gay men. However, Harry Rosenberg, the mortality-statistics chief at the National Center for Health Statistics, says he’s unaware of evidence that HIV-negative gays have a lower life expectancy than other males. Rosenberg also points to one reason to think the HIV-negative gay male may actually live longer on average than the straight male: Gays may have higher incomes and more education on average than straights—two factors powerfully correlated with longer life spans. (Bennett himself appears to share this view, terming gays, “as a group, wealthy and well educated.”)

Challenged by the Human Rights Campaign’s Elizabeth Birch in the letters column of the Dec. 8 Standard, Bennett, remarkably, dug in to defend the Cameron numbers, which he said coincided with the views of other authorities such as psychiatrist. Satinover’s 1996 book, Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, does discuss gay life spans, but cites as its authority ... Cameron’s study. In other words, Bennett is not adducing a second authority for his assertions but merely falling back on the first via its recycling by another writer.

Throughout the controversy, Bennett has made much of the cause of “truth” with a capital T. His Standard article, portentously titled “Clinton, Gays, and the Truth,” accused the Clintonites of scanting that important commodity. Bennett is right to the extent that there’s no excuse for telling falsehoods in the course of raising otherwise legitimate issues. He should mind his own lesson.

I have, by sheer unfortunate accident, encountered some online descriptions of ‘gender reassignment surgery.’

To call it butchery, depravity and bizarre is being too kind. These doctors should be struck off for merely attempting it.

Is this an excerpt from your own blog again? Just wondering.

Hi, lj! Don’t see you around that much. Hope all is well with you.

It took me a few minutes to find the original article on Fellowship of the Minds, here is the link. I will copy it in its entirety despite lack of formatting, read on Fellowship of The Minds to access links.

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/?s=medical+consequences+of+homosexual+behavior

Medical consequences of homosexual sexual behaviors
Posted on July 3, 2013 by Dr. Eowyn

Most of this post was first published two years ago as “What They’ll Never Tell You in ‘Homosexual Education’.” I’m re-publishing it, given:

Last week’s momentous Supreme Court decision against the federal DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act) law, which opens the floodgates to homosexual marriage across the United States. (See “Supreme Court rules for homosexual marriage,” June 26, 2013.)
The myth we’re being told that “gay” marriage is all about “love.” In fact, as lesbian activist Masha Gessen openly admitted what supporters of traditional marriage have long suspected, the push for gay marriage is about diminishing and eventually destroying the institution of marriage and redefining the traditional family. (See her on video, here.)

A word of warning:
When I first found out the information I’m about to relay to you, I was shocked and sick to my stomach. I kept the post in draft form for months, unable to bring myself to complete it. The great Scottish philosopher David Hume defined “evil” without resorting to theology: Evil is what causes harm or injury to oneself or to another. By that definition, the homosexual behaviors described below are evil.

Are you ready?

Take a deep breath. Here we go….

In his article, “The Health Risks of Gay Sex,” medical doctor John R. Diggs, Jr. writes that “The current media portrayal of gay and lesbian relationships is that they are as healthy, stable and loving as heterosexual marriages — or even more so. Medical associations are promoting somewhat similar messages.” But that portrayal is not consistent with facts.

Dr. Diggs warns that the consequences of homosexual sexual activity are distinct from the consequences of heterosexual activity. Just as it is his duty as a physician to recommend behaviors that are beneficial to our health and wellbeing, likewise it is his duty to inform patients of the health risks of gay sex — “Sexual relationships between members of the same sex expose gays, lesbians and bisexuals to extreme risks of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs), physical injuries, mental disorders and even a shortened life span.”

There are at least 5 major areas of differences between gay and heterosexual relationships, each with specific medical consequences. Those differences include:

Levels of promiscuity
Physical health
Mental health
Life span
Definition of “monogamy”
1. PROMISCUITY
The “extreme” health risks of homosexual sex are a direct consequence of sexual promiscuity. Simply put, homosexuals are more promiscuous than heterosexuals. Prior to the AIDS epidemic, a 1978 study found that:

75% of white gay males (3 of every 4) claimed to have had more than 100 lifetime male sex partners;
15% claimed 100-249 sex partners;
17% claimed 250-499;
15% claimed 500- 999;
28% (that’s more than 1 of every 5 white gay men!) claimed more than 1,000 lifetime male sex partners.
Levels of promiscuity subsequently declined but, with the advent of AIDS drugs, they are again approaching those of the 1970s. From 1994 to 1997, the percentage of homosexual men reporting multiple partners and unprotected anal sex rose from 23.6% to 33.3%, with the largest increase among men under 25. The medical consequence of this promiscuity is that gays have a greatly increased likelihood of contracting HIV/AIDS, syphilis and other STDs.

While similarly high rates of promiscuity have not been documented among lesbians, an Australian study did find lesbians to be more promiscuous than straight women:

93% of lesbians reported having had sex with men. Other studies similarly show that 75-90% of women who have sex with women have also had sex with men.
Lesbians were 4.5 times more likely than heterosexual women (9% of lesbians vs. 2% of heterosexual women) to have had more than 50 lifetime male sex partners.
In addition to diseases that may be transmitted during lesbian sex, a study at an Australian STD clinic found that lesbians were 3 to 4 times more likely than heterosexual women to have sex with men who were high-risk for HIV.
It goes without saying that any degree of sexual promiscuity carries the risk of contracting STDs.

2. PHYSICAL HEALTH
Excessive sexual promiscuity and certain common sexual practices among gay men result in epidemics like AIDS and serious medical consequences, some of which are virtually unknown among heterosexuals. A British researcher summarizes the danger as follows:

“penile-anal, mouth-penile, and hand-anal sexual contact is usual for both [male homosexual] partners, and mouth-anal contact is not infrequent…. Mouth-anal contact is the reason for the relatively high incidence of diseases caused by bowel pathogens in male homosexuals. Trauma may encourage the entry of micro-organisms and thus lead to primary syphilitic lesions occurring in the anogenital area…. In addition to sodomy, trauma may be caused by foreign bodies, including stimulators of various kinds, penile adornments, and prostheses.”

a. Anal intercourse:

Beginning in the “gay” culture, anal sex has now been “popularized” among heterosexuals via systematic propaganda of pornography.

But the simple truth is this: The human body was not designed to accommodate anal intercourse.

The rectum is significantly different from the vagina with regard to suitability for penetration by a penis. The vagina has natural lubricants and is composed of a mucus membrane with a multi-layer stratified squamous epithelium that allows it to endure friction without damage and to resist the immunological actions caused by semen and sperm. In contrast, the anus is a delicate mechanism of small muscles that comprise an “exit-only” passage. With repeated trauma, friction and stretching, the sphincter loses its tone and its ability to maintain a tight seal. Consequently, anal intercourse leads to leakage of fecal material that can easily become chronic. Moreover, the intestine has only a single layer of cells separating it from blood. Therefore, any organisms that are introduced into the rectum have a much easier time establishing a foothold for infection than they would in a vagina. The single layer tissue cannot withstand the friction associated with penile penetration, resulting in traumas that expose both participants to blood, organisms in feces, and a mixing of bodily fluids.

Furthermore, ejaculate has components that are immunosuppressive, designed to allow the sperm to evade the immune defenses of the female. The fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, make anal-genital intercourse a most efficient manner of transmitting HIV and other infections. Below is a list of diseases found with extraordinary frequency among male homosexual practitioners as a result of anal intercourse. Sexual transmission of some of these diseases is so rare in the exclusively heterosexual population as to be virtually unknown. Lesbians are also at higher risk for these STDs:

Anal cancer
Chlamydia trachomatis
Cryptosporidium
Giardia lamblia
Herpes simplex virus
Human immunodeficiency virus
Human papilloma virus
Isospora belli
Microsporidia
Gonorrhea
Viral hepatitis types B & C
Syphilis: gay men contracted syphilis at 3 to 4 times the rate of heterosexuals.
HIV/AIDS: A study based upon statistics from 1986 through 1990 estimated that 20-year-old gay men had a 50% chance of becoming HIV positive by age 55. As of June 2001, nearly 64% of men with AIDS were men who have had sex with men.
b. Oral-anal contact (aka “rimming”):

It is because of “rimming” that intestinal parasites ordinarily found in the tropics are encountered in the bodies of American gay men. An extremely high rate of parasitic and other intestinal infections is documented among male homosexual practitioners because of oral-anal contact. There are so many infections that a syndrome called “the Gay Bowel” is described in the medical literature. Gay bowel syndrome includes such diseases as Hepatitis A, Giardia lamblia, Entamoeba histolytica,Epstein-Barr virus,Neisseria meningitides,Shigellosis, Salmonellosis, Pediculosis, scabies, Campylobacter, and typhoid.

c. Human Waste

Some gay men engage in coprophilia, which means sexual contact with (including ingesting) highly infectious fecal wastes. This practice exposes the participants to all of the risks of anal-oral contact and many of the risks of analgenital contact.

d. Fisting

“Fisting” refers to the insertion of a hand or forearm into the rectum, and is far more damaging than anal intercourse. Tears can occur, along with incompetence of the anal sphincter. The result can include infections, inflammation and, consequently, enhanced susceptibility to future STDs. 22% of homosexuals (nearly 1 of every 4) in one survey admitted to having participated in this practice.

Al Pacino and director William Friedkin got a lot of flak from “gay rights” activists for showing the truth in the 1980 movie Cruising, about an undercover cop investigating a serial killer who targets gay men, especially those involved in the S&M “culture.” One of the scenes in the movie was of a man in a gay bar smearing talcum powder on his right fist and wrist, followed by another man being fisted. If this isn’t evil, I truly don’t know what is.

e. Sadism

Sadism is the sexualization of pain and cruelty, named for the 18th Century novelist, the Marquis de Sade. The medical consequences of such activities range from mild to fatal, depending upon the nature of the injuries inflicted. As many as 37% of homosexuals (more than 1 of every 3) have practiced some form of sadism.

3. MENTAL HEALTH
Multiple studies have identified high rates of psychiatric illness, including depression, drug abuse and suicide attempts, among selfprofessed gays and lesbians. Gay activists argue that mental illness is induced by other people’s homophobia and intolerance.

But that argument is undermined by an extensive study in the Netherlands — a country of legalized same-sex marriages where GLBTs are widely accepted.The Dutch study, published in the Archives of General Psychiatry, found a high rate of psychiatric disease associated with same-sex sex. Gay men were much more likely to experience major depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia and obsessive compulsive disorder. Lesbians were more often diagnosed with major depression, social phobia or alcohol dependence. The researchers found “that homosexuality is not only associated with mental health problems during adolescence and early adulthood…but also in later life.”

Depression and drug abuse, in turn, can lead to reckless sexual behavior, even among those who understand the deadly risks, such as older professional gay men.

4. LIFE SPAN
The only epidemiological study (from Vancouver, Canada) to date on the life span of gay men concluded that gay and bisexual men lose up to 20 years of life expectancy. Compare that to cigarette smokers, who lose on average about 13.5 years of life expectancy. The Canadian study concluded that the probability of a 20-year-old gay or bisexual man living to 65 years was only 32%, compared to 78% for men in general.

5. MONOGAMY
Monogamy means long-term sexual fidelity. The most extensive survey of sex in America found that a vast majority of heterosexual committed couples are faithful: 94% of married people and 75% of cohabiting people had only one partner in the prior year.But long-term sexual fidelity is rare among GLB (gay, lesbian, bisexual) couples, particularly among gay males. Even during the coupling period, many gay men do not expect monogamy. One study reported that 66% of gay couples reported sex outside the relationship within the first year, and nearly 90% if the relationship lasted 5 years.

The average gay or lesbian relationship is also short lived. In one study, only 15% of gay men and 17.3% of lesbians had relationships that lasted more than 3 years. In other words, whatever data we have show very little long-term monogamy in GLB relationships, which then raises the question of why homosexuals are so insistent on their “unions” being legalized as marriages.

To read Dr. Diggs’ article in detail, go here. Another good article is Dr. Paul Cameron’s “Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do.”

http://www.biblebelievers.com/Cameron2.html

“Interesting posting history you got there, Rip Spam Winkle.”

—

Yes,and it is VERY annoying.

I can never figure out why it is allowed,especially on a site that is supported by donations as this one is.

.

Source for that?

Source for that?

William Bennett, Gays, and the Truth https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1997/12/william-bennett-gays-and-the-truth.html

Incredible that this filthy, life-shortening way of life is held in such high regard. Smokers can live well into their 70s or 80s, and this homosexual behavior is such a dangerous way of life. And keep in mind, they used their own obituaries over a long time to come up with these figures. Naturally, the homo magazines stopped listing the ages shortly after this article.

And of course, the retarded plagiarizing site you’re forced to redirect to is infested with more spam and popups and text-blocking crawly things.

When you note this, others here inevitably chime in proudly with “I have Super-Cyber-Condom and I didn’t have any popups!”

To which I reply that’s nice but I’d still avoid sticking my mouse in the two-dollar-whore blog.

Aha, thank you very much.

They also keep the “homos have always been after the young boys” out of the picture.